stempniaksen
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2008
- 11,166
- 4,492
Please stop just looking up HockeyDB. Ask any Flames fan how impressive Markstrom was this season. In January there was talk of the Vezina if Calgary held onto the Wild Card.
Here are some stats:
For STARTING goalies: 1500mins+ this year.
Markstrom: #1 in HDSV%
Lowest shot average distance
Top 10 in rushed against
This guy was getting absolutely shelled with high danger chances against, and led the league in stopping them. Like, you pick up Markstrom, if you're in a competition window, you're adding a top 5-10 goalie in the NHL. If you're Calgary, and your defensive group has 4 guys most people have never heard of and you're entering a rebuild... yeah, this guys numbers aren't going to jump off the page.
Take out Mangiapane and 41OA.Markstrom + Mangiapane + #9OV + #41OV
for
Chychrun + Korpisalo + R.Jarventie + #7OV + #25OV
Keep dreaming.If Ottawa really wants Markstrom. Then Markstrom, Pelletier and Mangiapane for Tkachuk.
I really can't believe how many clueless fans there are out there
For two years with some retention? Not much.34 year old goalie coming off .892 and .905 seasons and making 6 mil per year. What can go wrong?
What's so solid about Markstrom who's been pretty up and down in his career with periods of good play and then periods of not so good play. Not so different from a guy like Samsonov except costlier and older and both probably aren't able to get you through 4 rounds of playoffs.
Honestly, that's why fans don't love paying out the wazoo for non elite goalies
We need defensemanToronto interested in Markstrom? Jesus Christ... Why not just re-ink Marner if the plan is to waste money and cap space?
No one said he’s an average goalie, he is an average starter. He’s definitely worth 23OA to the leafs with some retention.It's near impossible to gage how good or bad Markstrom is based on this thread.
CGY fans want everything from TOR's 1st to Tkachuck(OTT) for Markstrom.
So he's an average goalie who coincidentally would fetch a 1st or a star player?!
the bolded isnt enough for someone to take on the 4 years left on his contract even if you change the OR to an AND.Korpisalo + Boston's 1st or Ottawa's 2nd for Binnington?
Plenty of players do have children but the first is always the most stressful because you have no idea what you are doing and the best advise you can get is "you just have to experience it."Plenty of players have families that have children during the year and their play doesn't always flop. He's an older guy and some guys fall sooner than you expect.
If it was one down year you'd have more of a power not, but two is the start of a trend.
Teams may still have interest in the guy but the Flames are fighting an uphill battle. Trying to trade him I think
Pass. I think the Sens are aware that Korpisalo isn’t moving this year.In a theoretical trade between Ott & CGY, Korp will likely have to be swapped too.
That is an ugly contract though, so if this is to happen Ott would have to give something good up.
7th OA would be the only way this could happen IMO
I am expecting a late 1st but some Flames fans think he is worth the 10th overall in some kind of package, Markstrom at 50% + 28th for the 10th has been proposed a few times. Anyone expecting the 10th overall will be disappointed.It's near impossible to gage how good or bad Markstrom is based on this thread.
CGY fans want everything from TOR's 1st to Tkachuck(OTT) for Markstrom.
So he's an average goalie who coincidentally would fetch a 1st or a star player?!
the bolded isnt enough for someone to take on the 4 years left on his contract even if you change the OR to an AND.
also, forget about getting a player in return that will ever play a game in the nhl.
/edit
thinking about it more, I was harsh, your package could return at least 1 player
so, realistically, for you:
Korpisalo + Boston's 1st or Ottawa's 2nd for Mrazek ...shaves 2 years off and a cheaper cap hit for likely similar goaltending.
I mean if the math is there then sure. If Markstrom at 50% is worth about 23rd OA then Markstrom (50%) + #28 is pretty close to #10. Using PuckPedia #10 = 34.22, whereas #23 + #28 = 28.51 (a difference of about a 2nd. Using the Athletic's GSVA chart #10 has a GSVA of 6.0 and #28 has a GSVA of 3.1 so according to that all it would take to move up is #30.I am expecting a late 1st but some Flames fans think he is worth the 10th overall in some kind of package, Markstrom at 50% + 28th for the 10th has been proposed a few times. Anyone expecting the 10th overall will be disappointed.
I mean if the math is there then sure. If Markstrom at 50% is worth about 23rd OA then Markstrom (50%) + #28 is pretty close to #10. Using PuckPedia #10 = 34.22, whereas #23 + #28 = 28.51 (a difference of about a 2nd. Using the Athletic's GSVA chart #10 has a GSVA of 6.0 and #28 has a GSVA of 3.1 so according to that all it would take to move up is #30.