If people really believe that anything and everything is hopeless because Tomlin/Sullivan will ruin it and/or mismanage it, why do you follow these teams at all? Why spend hours on message boards discussing it? This utter nihilism that excuses every player for Steelers/Penguins based on the head coach is simply absurd. YES, I WANT TOMLIN GONE. However, the idea that you should just throw up your hands and keep running a trash QB out there because he's coach and he'll screw up whomever the QB is quite the take. If you really believe it, I'd suggest finding a public library and spend the next several years finding other means of recreation.
And that's fine, but why bother watching until they fire them if absolutely nothing you do matters until they are gone? It'll be made public when Tomlin is gone. You can pick back up then.BC at some point you hope the time investment will pay off when they eventually can these clowns masquerading as professional head coaches.
Yep was about to say the exact same thing.This just makes the Wilson deal look even more insane in terms of value.
I think the only team that could be interested in Fields at this point is probably the Vikings, but would the Bears trade him within the division? I'm really skeptical of that.
I could also see the Broncos.
Maybe LVR or the Broncos trade up for McCarthy in the draft.I think the only team that could be interested in Fields at this point is probably the Vikings, but would the Bears trade him within the division? I'm really skeptical of that.
I could also see the Broncos.
I hope not. He's washed and the last thing this defense needs is another slow LB.With Wilson coming to Pittsburgh, do you think they will sign Wagner as well as they are good friends and the Steelers had ties to Wagner before. . . .
Wagner is not washed.I hope not. He's washed and the last thing this defense needs is another slow LB.
He was a 2nd team all pro last year, and 10th straight.I hope not. He's washed and the last thing this defense needs is another slow LB.
Fields is only going to bring back like a 5th if the only teams trading for him are doing it as a backup.
I think the Seahawks could have some sneaky interest in Fields
They’re really awesome. I would love to promote Khan to a POFO type role and keep Wiedl, but even if not, letting talent matriculate isn’t a bad thing.The speed and efficiency of which Wiedl and Khan operate is refreshing. They recognize when shit isn't working and cut ties with it the moment they can.
And the onus is on the coach to help him swim.
Which he didn't.
At no point did Tomlin give the green light for a non-conservative scheme designed to give a QB the best chance of developing. Tomlin's public stance was always "as long as we're winning I'm happy". To take it back to Jiggyfly's original post that prompted this discussion, at no point did Tomlin's actions with Pickett disprove the following:
Tomlin was not willing to put developing a young QB over winning games.
And here's the thing.
That's not a defence of Pickett. I mean, it can form part of one if you want it to, but Pickett's fate and what Pickett deserves can be wholly independent of criticising Mike Tomlin's attitude to recruiting and developing the QB position.
Pickett is whatever, man. Pickett is effectively history barring a big twist.
But Mike Tomlin will be continuing to make QB decisions for the foreseeable. That should scare Steelers' fans. Everyone will have their own opinion as to where the flaw with Pickett lies, but I don't get how anyone can look at how this two years went and feel comfortable with the idea that Tomlin is part of getting the next one. He is too conservative, too short-termist, and seemingly too lousy an evaluator of talent at the position as well.
I think the only team that could be interested in Fields at this point is probably the Vikings, but would the Bears trade him within the division? I'm really skeptical of that.
I could also see the Broncos.
Some draft news while we wait for the Steelers to do something in FA