Tank Nation: Who's In?

Cor

I am a bot
Jun 24, 2012
69,648
35,246
AEF
So, for those who have been paying attention to the youngin's, what kind of player are we potentially looking at in the first round this year?

At our range, it is all about the skilled forwards, something we need in our prospect pool desperately.

Other then Haydn Fleury, there is virtually no D worth taking in our range. Honka is solid, but I have him 15-19 range.

Nick Ritchie is a kid I have fallen in love with, and should be available at 8-10. He is a big right winger, and put up 74 points in 61 games with the Petes' this season. For his size he is a good skater, and has a fantastic shot. Honestly, I REALLY want this kid, and would take him as high as 6.

Brendan Perlini is the linemate of Leaf draft pick Carter Verhaghe. Likely won't be available past the 8th pick, he is another good sized kid. He got 71 points in 58 games this season. He has very strong hockey IQ, and has tons of skill with the puck, to go along with strong speed.

William Nylander is the third on my list of hopeful draftees. He is a tad small at 5'11, but that allows him to fly around defenders, in a Kessel like fashion. He is an extremely skilled, highly dynamic player with great vision. This kid has all the tools to be a top end offensive player. He needs to improve his defensive game though. Posted 34 points in 57 games between the SHL and the Allsvenskan league.
 

MVP of West Hollywd

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
3,618
1,018
I don't think we can improve our draft stock much (considering passing NJD is irrelevant) but tankforfirings sounds good to me
 

Ash35

Registered User
Jan 29, 2010
1,234
33
Can't wait till we draft another player who's too young to help us within the next 5 years.
 

Tonka

OFFSIDE
Apr 8, 2007
9,776
245
This is one of the reasons this team annoys the heck out of me...we were supposed to tank five years ago but nope, we chose not to...now 5-6 years later we have thread like this calling for a tank, which now is too late.

If this team can promise me that they will lose all their games, then I will be part of tank nation, but knowing this team, it will be stuck at 14th spot.
 

Macman

Registered User
May 15, 2004
3,479
509
This is one of the reasons this team annoys the heck out of me...we were supposed to tank five years ago but nope, we chose not to...now 5-6 years later we have thread like this calling for a tank, which now is too late.

If this team can promise me that they will lose all their games, then I will be part of tank nation, but knowing this team, it will be stuck at 14th spot.

Yup. They'll win their last five straight when the pressure is off, still miss the playoffs, and screw themselves out of a better pick.
 

Ratboy

I made a funny!
Jul 15, 2009
16,855
3,344
Yup. They'll win their last five straight when the pressure is off, still miss the playoffs, and screw themselves out of a better pick.

The players don't care about drafting position. If we draft a stud, it means one of them is out of a job.

They have nothing to lose now, and will be playing for pride alone - if they have any left. This season is over, and I'd only care to keep not even a handful of our players.

We need a massive overhaul, is Nonis the guy to do it? I have my doubts.
 

Cool Hand Luke

Registered User
May 27, 2008
1,675
0
If we look at it mathematically, what is best possible scenario (for draft pick) looks like this:

Leafs lose remaining six games. Finish with 80 points. 27 ROW.

To Pass Us:
Vancouver needs to win 1 game in 6.
Nashville needs to win 3 games in 7.
Winnipeg needs to win 3 games in 7.
Ottawa needs to win 3 games in 9.
Carolina needs to win 3 games in 8.
Calgary needs to win 6 games in 8.
Islanders need to win 6 games in 8.
Florida, Edmonton and Buffalo cannot catch us.

Therefore, the lowest we could finish mathematically is 27th overall.

If you look at the reality of the above and the schedules of each team, I would predict the following:

Leafs lose 5 of last 6 games (W in Florida). Finish with 82 points. 28 ROW.

To Pass Us:
Vancouver wins 1 game in 6 (Edm). Finish with 82 points. 30 ROW.
Nashville wins 2 games in 7 (PHX and MIN). Finish with 79 points. 33 ROW.
Winnipeg wins 3 games in 7 (PHX, TOR, MIN). Finish with 81 points. 30 ROW.
Ottawa wins 4 games in 9 (CAR, NYI, NJ, TOR). Finish with 82 points. 30 ROW.
Carolina wins 2 games in 8 (NJ, WASH). Finish with 78 points. 33 ROW.
Calgary wins 6 games in 8 (OTT, TOR, FLA, NJ, WIN, NJ). Finish with 81 points. 31 ROW.
Islanders win 3 games in 8 (FLA, NJ, BUF). Finish with 74 points. 25 ROW.

According to above, 2 teams pass us (Ottawa and Vancouver), and NJ does not count. We finish with the 9th pick overall.

Of course, I didn't count loser points, but I'm not going to go that deep. Considering possible loser points Winnipeg and Calgary could pass us. Which would put us at 7th overall.

So that is my predicted range. 7th - 9th overall.
 

Teeder9

Free rent for Mo?
Oct 14, 2011
7,537
3
Ontario
I'm pro-tank and disagree with your anti-tank views, but you're right about this.

The Leafs are extremely incompetent when it comes to drafting.

This is a team that would have likely skipped over Crosby and Ovechkin in their respective draft years.

There is no limit to the incompetence of this stupid, horrible, disgusting, greedy, heartless organization.

While I know you don't believe this, it brings up a funny thing my Brother-in-law said about the OV draft. Paraphrasing a Bruin fan: You should be glad you don't pick first. Your team would trade the #1, 2nd round, 3rd round, 4th round, 5th round, 6th round, 7th round picks trading down to #2 just to send it out west for a vet.

I wouldn't take anyone outside of the top 8th this year over guys in the 20-25 range from last years draft.

You didn't take Gauthier

The players don't care about drafting position. If we draft a stud, it means one of them is out of a job.

They have nothing to lose now, and will be playing for pride alone - if they have any left. This season is over, and I'd only care to keep not even a handful of our players.

We need a massive overhaul, is Nonis the guy to do it? I have my doubts.

While I have thought this the years we won to finish 9th, it's the first time I've actually seen anyone say it. I wonder if this goes through their heads?
 

Teeder9

Free rent for Mo?
Oct 14, 2011
7,537
3
Ontario
If we look at it mathematically, what is best possible scenario (for draft pick) looks like this:

Leafs lose remaining six games. Finish with 80 points. 27 ROW.

To Pass Us:
Vancouver needs to win 1 game in 6.
Nashville needs to win 3 games in 7.
Winnipeg needs to win 3 games in 7.
Ottawa needs to win 3 games in 9.
Carolina needs to win 3 games in 8.
Calgary needs to win 6 games in 8.
Islanders need to win 6 games in 8.
Florida, Edmonton and Buffalo cannot catch us.

Therefore, the lowest we could finish mathematically is 27th overall.

If you look at the reality of the above and the schedules of each team, I would predict the following:

Leafs lose 5 of last 6 games (W in Florida). Finish with 82 points. 28 ROW.

To Pass Us:
Vancouver wins 1 game in 6 (Edm). Finish with 82 points. 30 ROW.
Nashville wins 2 games in 7 (PHX and MIN). Finish with 79 points. 33 ROW.
Winnipeg wins 3 games in 7 (PHX, TOR, MIN). Finish with 81 points. 30 ROW.
Ottawa wins 4 games in 9 (CAR, NYI, NJ, TOR). Finish with 82 points. 30 ROW.
Carolina wins 2 games in 8 (NJ, WASH). Finish with 78 points. 33 ROW.
Calgary wins 6 games in 8 (OTT, TOR, FLA, NJ, WIN, NJ). Finish with 81 points. 31 ROW.
Islanders win 3 games in 8 (FLA, NJ, BUF). Finish with 74 points. 25 ROW.

According to above, 2 teams pass us (Ottawa and Vancouver), and NJ does not count. We finish with the 9th pick overall.

Of course, I didn't count loser points, but I'm not going to go that deep. Considering possible loser points Winnipeg and Calgary could pass us. Which would put us at 7th overall.

So that is my predicted range. 7th - 9th overall.

Canucks and NJ will pass us but that's it. One spot more than now
 
Mar 14, 2011
3,828
889
Leafs schedule looks pretty weak, wouldn't be surprise if they end up putting a string of victories near the end of the season. This happens way to often after a team gets a win to break their slump.
 

Apotheosis

Registered User
Mar 27, 2014
11,618
5,178
Toronto, Ontario
As long as we're bad enough to be in contention for Mcdavid next year, I could care less. If we don't even try for him, I'm done with this team for good.
 

Mehar

Registered User
Apr 28, 2012
1,311
266
Toronto, Ontario
This thread is better served for next year. No point in the Leafs tanking now with the season almost over and a Playoff Spot is still up for grabs (LOL).
 

pooleboy

Registered User
Dec 23, 2009
6,579
16
Ontario
What is wrong with the Leafs (long text beware) tank thread

The Leafs are a flawed team. There is no example in the NHL where you core was built through trades, why? Because no successful franchise has built their team this way. Boston had Kessel, since they have been the best team in the East winning a Stanley cup and are currently in 1st place. If he was a core player, one you NEEDED to win Boston woudn’t have traded him, and since they have they have won. Phaneuf was also acquired in trade, Lupul, Gardiner, JVR(but to some extent it was a core for core players, he had injury problem ect) and Bernier who is a #1 behind a very good goalie in Quick. If any of these players were players you win with the teams that drafted them wouldn’t have traded them.

The class of the NHL is jonathan Toews, Sydney Crosby. Why are these players so successful as well as winners? Because they care, they backcheck, they hit fight get into arguments get angry ect. Kessel (our star player) doesn’t back check he doesn’t hit, when we need a big play he shy’s away from contact. Phaneuf he is one of our core players as well, when Backes challenged him (St. Louis #1 Center not some bum on the 4th line) he shied away. When Simmonds challenged him he shied away, and then took on Voracheck? (sp?) What does that mean to your younger players or depth players who you are expected to fight, to backcheck? It is a trickle down effect from your best players to your worst. It will wear off on them when they see these star players getting paid 5,7, 8 million who don’t do anything it takes to actually win a game? No, this goes to my 1st point, don’t sign players to long-term deals unless they have actually won something. I have said it for a long time, I would trade Kessel and Phaneuf before giving them those deals, those players aren’t winners, they havn’t won anything and have just successfully collapsed for a 3rd straight year.

This comes to my 2nd point, how to build a successful team. Thinking back to Brian Burke yesterday his philosophy is to build a winning culture. We saw this wasn’t a good game plan in Vancouver (idc about playoffs, I care about actually winning the cup) but we saw this was a good game plan in Anaheim (after a core was built with Getz, Perry ect). Toronto doesn’t have that core, they have a bunch of has-beens. They had it even worse when Burke got here. The normal Toronto fan hears Toews is amazing blah blah blah, but I hear Bennet is amazing and the only way to acquire a Toews calibre player is to draft them. Toews will never be traded because he is a star player, that can win and we cannot get a player like that unless we draft them. Building through the draft is the only way to build a successful team. Yes it doesn’t work everytime, but its based on the players you draft. You have a much more likely chance to draft a star player with more picks (simple math) and higher picks (getting to pick the player you want more likely). You need that one player who will do everything to win and will push every player to get better. For example Kobe calls out his players all the time when they suck, I have yet to hear kessel or phaneuf call anyone out on their play. Need a franchise player who isn’t someone’s hamie downs, someone another team didn’t want. No teams have built there team to be a successful one without drafting core pieces. Toronto is the only team in the league who built their core primarily through trades. Drafting and Developing leads to long-term success rather than trading and hoping cause people want it to be a speedy process but it isn’t. It isn’t like soccer where u can buy a player, or the MLB where you can just pay players, to be successful in the NHL you need to draft and develop your own talent.

I remember the day Mats Sundin wasn’t traded (who u think is amazing, but yet was traded to the leafs and surprise surprise didn’t win anything) and we were destined to be mediocure forever, Mccabe, Kaberle, ect didn’t want to move. We had no picks and went into the draft selecting 7th. We should have been in last, grabbing either Stamkos or Doughty but “we need playoffs†attitude is so wrong. Once you have a core (like Edmontons) then you can say “we need playoffs†but we don’t have a core, we had nothing and should have rebuilt the team. Since then we have traded for everyone’s hamie downs and players who can help your core, but are signed as our core. I have wanted a proper rebuild since the days of sundin, we could have picked Stamkos/Doughty, Tavares/Duchene, Seguin/Hall, RNH/Huberdeau/Couterier, but no, instead we got Kessel at a stupid cap hit, JVR, and Kadri. On what planet is Kessel, JVR (which was an amazing trade by management) and Kadri (who was properly developed) better than (at worst) Doughty, Duchene, Seguin and Couterier? I am tired of watching the Leafs team try and make quick fixes and try and make the playoffs faster, its about building through the draft, replenishing picks for dwindling assets and I have no idea how this idea how this theory just escaped the Toronto maple leafs for so long. I have no idea why management is so inept in making simple asset management decisions.


Last point, which teams are successful in hockey? I am not looking at anything, this is all from memory but here are my top teams:
St. Louis Blue (still haven’t won anything) drafted players: Pieterangelo, Backes, Oshie (traded for non core players Bouwemester, Steen, Miller)
Pitsburgh Penguins (won) drafted players: Sydney Crosby, Marc Andre Fluery, Malkin, Letang. And this doesn’t include all their good Dmen they have selected (traded for non core players Neal, Kunitz)
LA Kings drafted players include: Brown, Kopitar, Doughty (have failed a lot in the draft too, but they got Richards and Carter through trades with one of their top picks in Schenn and Johnson but top picks<<<< playoffs right?)
Chicago Blackhawks core players: Toews, Seabrook, Keith, Kane (non core players Hossa (UFA) Sharp)
Boston Bruins (PROLLY CLOSEST THING YOU WILL SEE TO ACTUALLY NOT USING THE DRAFT)  core players Bergeron, Lucic, Marchand, Kreicji (other core players Chara UFA, Rask trade, Seguin and Hamilton through a guy they took top 5)
San Jose Sharks (STILL HAVNâ€T WON ANYTHING) core players Marleau, Couture, Vlasic (other core players Thornton Trade, Boyle)
Anaheim Getz, Perry, Fowler, (other core pieces Hiller UFA, Selanne)


Winning the Stanley cup is the ultimate goal, not just making the playoffs and this core has proven 3 straight years they cant even make the playoffs rather than win, blow it up. As far as im concerned Rielly, JVR (mostly because of his contract is so nice) and Bernier are our only untouchables, build through the draft, bring in core pieces that want to win, that have heart and leadership. We have the toughest position set, we just need the 2-3 more core pieces aka Bennet/Ekblad and a McDavid type of player and we would finally be a legit contender every year for the next decade. I would prefer that and lose all of next season than try and make the playoffs, miss (or even make it), get beat out in the 1st round and draft 20’s. This team needs a star player, they aren’t available through trades, or UFA but the draft, you need to get lucky but I would rather takin my chances with the draft than constantly being mediocre and saying “were so close†with mediocre players.
 

blueberrie

Registered User
Mar 23, 2010
2,733
404
Can't wait till we draft another player who's too young to help us within the next 5 years.

That perfectly sums up why the Leafs are so terrible today.

They trade picks because they can't help them instantly then in 5 years when there's nothing in the pipeline they need to trade more picks to bring in a player to fill that open spot.

Draft picks aren't SUPPOSED to immediately help you within 5 years. It's a long term fix that if you draft and develop properly you'll have cheap young talent ready to contribute down the road. Sure there's some luck required, just as in any aspect of team building. But that luck can result in a franchise player that you get FOR FREE.

The Leafs are short term fix after short term fix. And now we're desperately looking for another short term fix just to even make the playoffs with a prime aged core. They're actually considering retooling the retool. It's mayhem.

That would actually really explain the short sightedness and lack of any direction if MLSE isn't looking more than 5 years in the future.
 

Leafidelity

Existentially Drifting
Apr 6, 2008
38,207
8,525
Downtown Canada
As long as we're bad enough to be in contention for Mcdavid next year, I could care less. If we don't even try for him, I'm done with this team for good.

Might want to prepare for the worst then, because there is next to no chance McDavid ends up in Toronto. There are some historically bad teams around the NHL lining up for that ticket.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad