Jeff Skinners contract is an albatross. We should not be comparing potential marner deals to some of the worst ones on the market. It's only 8m for 2 years.
After two years hes gonna want 13-15 million. Hes gonna say he already gave a discount and wants overpayment on his next deal. I'd rather 8 years 11 million than 2 years 8 mill
Thats way too high for that term.If they somehow go for a short deal watch it being like 2 or 3 x9.95 or 10 or something.
If it takes him past the next lockout, I'd be okay with it. The last few lockouts have given teams the ability to make adjustments; it's possible the Leafs could figure their salary structure out under the new CBA easier. Especially if the new CBA starts with another penalty-less buyout period, or drops salary like the 2004 one did.Jeff Skinners contract is an albatross. We should not be comparing potential marner deals to some of the worst ones on the market. It's only 8m for 2 years.
After two years hes gonna want 13-15 million. Hes gonna say he already gave a discount and wants overpayment on his next deal. I'd rather 8 years 11 million than 2 years 8 mill
Yep, we're going to continue to pretend that Marner's 90 point season last year was entirely John Tavares, and without him Marner would have had the same point totals as Nylander...Had similar productoin to Nylander before last year.
Jeff Skinners contract is an albatross. We should not be comparing potential marner deals to some of the worst ones on the market. It's only 8m for 2 years.
After two years hes gonna want 13-15 million. Hes gonna say he already gave a discount and wants overpayment on his next deal. I'd rather 8 years 11 million than 2 years 8 mill
I saw Mitch Marner in a grocery store in Toronto yesterday. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a *****e and bother him and ask him for photos or anything.
He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?”
I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued with my shopping, and I heard him chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw Mitch trying to walk out the doors with like fifteen bags of skittles in his hands without paying.
The girl at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Sir, you need to pay for those first.” At first he kept pretending to be tired and not hear her, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter.
When she took one of the bags and started scanning it multiple times, he stopped her and told her to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me. I don’t even think that’s a word. After she scanned each bar and put them in a bag and started to say the price, he kept interrupting her by yawning really loudly.
Id be ok with a bridge so long as a NMC isn't involved
Matthews is leaving in 5 years anyways, not really concerned with term on anyone else anymore. It's blow up time in 4. With Reilly and Freddy next, we have 2 seasons to win the cup or bust
can you provide proof of this? or are you just making stuff up?Matthews is leaving in 5 years anyways, not really concerned with term on anyone else anymore. It's blow up time in 4. With Reilly and Freddy next, we have 2 seasons to win the cup or bust
Matthews is leaving in 5 years anyways, not really concerned with term on anyone else anymore. It's blow up time in 4. With Reilly and Freddy next, we have 2 seasons to win the cup or bust
can you provide proof of this? or are you just making stuff up?
If you are planning this out. The assumption is and has to be the asset is leaving in 5. We have no rights to him, only an opportunity to offer him a deal that the new CBA will allow. So, default is he is leaving.
Matthews is leaving in 5 years anyways, not really concerned with term on anyone else anymore. It's blow up time in 4. With Reilly and Freddy next, we have 2 seasons to win the cup or bust
Matthews is leaving in 5 years anyways, not really concerned with term on anyone else anymore. It's blow up time in 4. With Reilly and Freddy next, we have 2 seasons to win the cup or bust
If you are planning this out. The assumption is and has to be the asset is leaving in 5. We have no rights to him, only an opportunity to offer him a deal that the new CBA will allow. So, default is he is leaving.
Matthews is leaving in 5 years anyways, not really concerned with term on anyone else anymore. It's blow up time in 4. With Reilly and Freddy next, we have 2 seasons to win the cup or bust
The only franchise player to leave his team in the cal era has been JT..... who left for the Leafs.
Most big named RFAs have only signed 5-6 years post ELC only a handful ever signed 7-8 year ones. Matthew's contract shouldn't be seen as any indication of what his future may hold
can you provide proof of this? or are you just making stuff up?
I can't see this happening at all. We'll just have to buy more UFA years, which are more costly regardless of his production.Not necessarily.
If the other RFA's sign for $9M and outperform Marner then he'll be lucky to sign an 8 year deal for $8-9M.
If Marner signs a 2x8, the better his RFA classmates do in comparison to Marner could actually negatively affect his value. If Marner wants $13-$15M, he would have to really outperform all the current RFA's. If a Point, Tkachuk or Aho burst out of the gate, then Marner better get his ass in gear and outscore them.
Edit: Also if Matthews plays a full season and puts up huge numbers, Marner is going to have a hard time demanding anything over or near his contract.
I'd gamble the 2x$8M
Matthews is leaving in 5 years anyways, not really concerned with term on anyone else anymore. It's blow up time in 4. With Reilly and Freddy next, we have 2 seasons to win the cup or bust