WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 34,639
- 12,817
Industrial experience is nearly seamlessly transferable in almost all cases; I took what I learned working for Toyota, and directly extrapolated out a lot of those practices into working for an office furniture manufacturer, vastly different in scope but key elements remain the same.
People can, over time, overtake another person with more experience through the law of declining of returns, but one thing that cannot happen unless you trip and fall into an absolute genius/prodigy/outlier is have someone exceed that person without the same experience.
I do think, though, that we've bifurcated the discussion - one about Wickenheiser deserving her own promotion aside from the rest, and the other being her qualifications as an AGM and if the group has been promoted on the same basis/merit.
As to the first, I submit that even through base history, Wickenheiser has done more than any of the others, and it's not even close particular to her role.
As to the second, I think Wickenheiser is deserving of an AGM role, but I debate the others - as a result, using the old adage, "if everyone is something, no one is something". Having 5 AGM's doesn't make them AGM's, it makes them Directors with prettier titles and bigger paycheques and fancier resumes, which will help them move on to bigger and better things (which I think is by design; if Dubas gets the boot, they'll likely get the boot as well, but will have AGM on their CV).
To use another company I worked for, on the Sales side, they wanted to promote 5 Regional Managers of Sales to Vice Presidents of Sales, despite the fact that they already had two VP's of Sales.
The Plan?
To have them each become Regional Vice Presidents, which was no different than Regional Managers - same responsibilities, no one below them got a corresponding promotion and no corresponding backfill to the RM position, and the existing Vice Presidents became Senior Vice Presidents so (you guessed it) bigger titles, and paycheques, but the same job.
Why did they do it? Simply put, they wanted to pay their people more and give them fancier titles. In reality, it was gross - they give already higher-ups just more money and clout, but the people who work beneath them lose opportunities at legitimate promotions and abilities to move their own careers forward.
I guarantee there is no plan to promote any new "Directors" to these portfolios. This is all glad-handing and resumé padding, while the people who report to them see little, if any, benefit... outside of potentially keeping their job under a new regime.
I agree on this and your other posts. Wickenheiser was actually the most deserving and she has a ton of actual hockey experience.