Orr????He also played against a lot of shit! He was one of the leagues best players ever in a league full of alot less talent.
Orr????He also played against a lot of shit! He was one of the leagues best players ever in a league full of alot less talent.
Because getting your achilles tendon chopped off is about your intelligence? What?Makar is lagging behind in the career altering injuries category. I don't think he'll ever be stupid enough to reach the same numbers as Karlsson
Again, how does a team get to within a goal of the finals if their best option on defence playing 30min a night is an 'adventure in his own end'? Seeing as they were not a high scoring team, it makes little sense.Makar is a much better player than Karlsson (Mr. Adventure in his own end).
The most impressive thing a player can do is be really good on a mediocre team.
as a defenceman that's actually true.
there are almost no norris winners or candidates that come from mediocre teams or non playoff teams.
they are almost all from contenders.
while any legit #1 who plays on a bad team people start asking if they actually suck. (hedman, chara, karlsson, doughty, keith etc happens to all)
a lot harder to stand out on a bad team as a top pair defenceman vs top pair on a contender playing with 4 ppg talents and a d-partner who himself was almost ppg.
Josi almost won this year and won 2 years ago on mediocre teams,
Same for Fox last year
Basement dwellers hardly seem like they'd qualify as mediocre. But if you added Makar (or another Norris level defenseman) to Arizona or Montreal, they wouldn't be basement dwellers anymore anyway.those teams aren't really that mediocre.
Predators have made the playoffs 8 straight seasons.
Fox had 4 players hit higher production than him and they were one of the best teams in the league this year.
I'm talking about teams that are basement dwellers.
at best they go from basement dwellers to mediocre and since there's no success no one really cares about Makar or that other Norris level defenceman because even if they perform at Norris level other defenceman playing on contenders will have more impressive stats, +/-, team success, and hype.Basement dwellers hardly seem like they'd qualify as mediocre. But if you added Makar (or another Norris level defenseman) to Arizona or Montreal, they wouldn't be basement dwellers anymore anyway.
I think to call Karlsson defensively average is a gross exaggeration. He was terrible at defense.Last thing I'll say is that I just completely reject the premise that we're forced to accept: that "prime Karlsson" was the guy that occured for a 19 game sample size in 2017 and that we can extrapolate that to his game the rest of the time. and we're just supposed to dismiss all the other evidence to the contrary.
That 2017 playoff model was actually him playing defensively over his head and that 'prime Karlsson' from 2013ish to 2018ish was not that guy. And that we're comparing Makar, who has a couple of years of this behind him already, to that quarter-season-sized sample?
The biggest issue in Karlsson's game was always defensive consistency. He showed he had the ability in 2017; but the other hundreds of games of his career he was the same flawed dude, excellent offensively, average-at-best defensively. Makar has already surpassed him on both fronts. And the incoming Conn Smythe will solidify that.
those teams aren't really that mediocre.
Predators have made the playoffs 8 straight seasons.
Fox had 4 players hit higher production than him and they were one of the best teams in the league this year.
I'm talking about teams that are basement dwellers.
Well... Players from mediocre teams have won Norris trophies pretty regularly? Karlsson did it in 2015, unless you want to argue that the 2015 Senators wouldn't be a basement team without EK.at best they go from basement dwellers to mediocre and since there's no success no one really cares about Makar or that other Norris level defenceman because even if they perform at Norris level other defenceman playing on contenders will have more impressive stats, +/-, team success, and hype.
All these 3 teams were 16th in the league points wise. So mediocre for me.
What about Larry Robinson and Lidstrom?Through four years I'd probably only put Orr and Potvin ahead of Makar. Bourque and Coffey are debatable. Karlsson and Leetch just behind.
I watched a lot of Senators hockey and over his career I don't think he was terribly good in his own end.Again, how does a team get to within a goal of the finals if their best option on defence playing 30min a night is an 'adventure in his own end'? Seeing as they were not a high scoring team, it makes little sense.
Makars resume is extremely impressive already. No doubt he will go down as the better player all time.
Why? He's already ahead of Karlsson in career achievementsPut Karlsson on this Avs team and he'd be a monster.
Let the kid finish his career first.