Seattle Totems
Registered User
- Apr 14, 2010
- 3,942
- 1,226
Not on this teamTrue, but most successful companies have an unwritten rule ' Any employee who has data to back up their position has the same voice as any executive"
Not on this teamTrue, but most successful companies have an unwritten rule ' Any employee who has data to back up their position has the same voice as any executive"
think how all the ahl 2 way contract guys feel who were squeezed out of big league daily paychecks to make all that cap room. it would be interesting to do the math on how much it cost a guy like sasson or ratu.Fitting that the year we have a sellers market and loads of cap space - no one needs it and doesn't want our players.
That's a fair point and definitely a factor of sympathy.People miss the timing here.
He looked good until his concussion.
Except they aren’t sitting in a playoff spot and are effectively competing with 3 other teams for 1 spot.
What position have you decided that I hold and are now debating?
Utah and Calgary have no UFA players like Suter to trade.
Have you gone mad?
I don’t really see the point in getting angry about our ownership/management behaving in the same way as every other management group does in every other sport in the same situation.
No team would be doing what you’re suggesting when you’re in our position and sitting in the playoffs. A lot would have tried to add, if anything.
And it’s not just that people are a bit disappointed. It’s *hysterics* here this morning. Mrs. Lovejoy shit, because a team sitting in a playoffs spot didn’t significantly weaken their roster before the playoffs.
As noted, this is completely different than Benning, who never knew a dollar of cap space he didn't need to immediately spend. And the way he spent those dollars was terribly incompetent.
But this is almost more disturbing because for any one who remembers, the last time the Canucks had mediocre teams that operated this far below the cap they almost left Vancouver.
All the recent reports indicate they're still far apart with Boeser, and contract talks are not going anywhere at the moment.
Agree.That's a fair point and definitely a factor of sympathy.
Unfortunately that doesn't change the equation of his performance making him a depressed asset. It would be less risky if he was just slumping or mentally overtaxed.
Right shot + 2.8m instead of 3.2m on the books for next season.How did Luke Schenn get a 2nd+4th but Soucy only a 3rd?
Rumour is that the Canucks are for sale in which case ownership probably wants to show the best financials (i.e., playoffs) as possible to any would be purchaser.
you think no other gms have any reason to completely undermine the credibility of a rival gm with agents and players?No other teams have any reason to expose him, he didn't call anyone out by name. I just refuse to believe with what this year's trade deadline prices have been, that no one offered a 1st. Just unbelievable outright.
My CEO is 38 and I started on the ground floor (started the company) with him in 2017 so he's very very very open minded. I am really lucky to work for him.You work at a good place. I’m similarly a director (also looking to move up) and have been in some shitshows with terrible CEOs. Though I’ve been in startups and have found it’s a lot more common
I think Carolina was sneaky smart with what they did. Stankoven is going to be cheap next year on his elc, nikishin will likely be playing for the on an elc as well and they have a TON of cap space to build with and 4 1st rounders and 4 3rds over the next couple years to fully load up and use as ammo to add players. Low key very smartBoston has sold off, and they were within sight of a playoff spot. It's wide open this year. Look at Carolina. They decided to look ahead (wrongly, I think, given how old some core players like Slavin are) and not put all their marbles into this year. It happens a lot more than you think and with more context involved than just loading up year after year if you're within sight of the playoffs.
Soucy has played like dogshit for most of the year. and the picks (WPG 2nd and SJ 3rd) are likely going to end up within a few of each otherHow did Luke Schenn get a 2nd+4th but Soucy only a 3rd?
Aside from a few bright spots, Rutherford and Allvin completely fumbled this entire season from beginning to end. Completely inexcusable.
I'm almost certain Allvin is lying out of his teeth. It sounds so crazy, but there is almost 0 chance there wasn't any teams willing to put a 1st out there for Boeser.
I'm almost certain Allvin is lying out of his teeth. It sounds so crazy, but there is almost 0 chance there wasn't any teams willing to put a 1st out there for Boeser.
Not sure why we care if Utah, Calgary and St. Louis are selling or not. Who cares.
To not get anything for Suter just feels confusing. I don’t think Boeser ages well either so can’t wait to be strapped to that contract moving forward. Find it hard to believe teams weren’t offering a 1st looking at other trades. Did nothing with all the cap space too.
Feels like we’re stuck in no man’s land again. This summer better be huge.
Its a constant with the team for the past 20 years.We are 8th in the West in points %.
Your position in your first post was that you were upset that bad ownership prevented us from selling.
What..? Why would anyone trade for Vladar?Calgary could have traded Vladar.
Bjugstad is on IR and... they resigned Cole.Utah had Cole and Bjugstad as pending UFAs and re-signed Cole.
What is this shit posting?And it isn’t just this year. Teams don’t sell when they’re sitting in the playoffs.
Rumour is that the Canucks are for sale in which case ownership probably wants to show the best financials (i.e., playoffs) as possible to any would be purchaser.
We just saw two teams firmly in a playoff picture, trade away one of the best wingers in the league when they knew he wouldn't, or they couldn't get him signed. That would be the Avs first and then the Hurricanes trading away Mikko Rantanen.
How is that not the same situation the Canucks were facing with Brock Boeser? Management has literally stated they're not going to lose players for nothing, and yet here we are. I don't understand the continual pattern of hamstringing your team that seems to happen with this organization.
Trading Boeser isn't "burning it down", it's a pragmatic approach to improving your team, and there's ample evidence that trading underperforming players actually improves your team., while keeping a guy who's checked out makes the team cohesion worse.
While there's no real argument to be made comparing Benning to Ruthervin, this one habit seems built into this organization and it's incredibly stupid. If Boeser had have been traded today, I doubt anyone would have complained about it and everyone would have supported managements decision. Why anyone is on board with decisions that actively make succeeding more difficult is beyond me.
I agree, he's full of it. Also what was the point of shuttling guys up and down? It wasn't for hockey reasons that's clear as day now. More likely to save Blueberries some dollars.I'm almost certain Allvin is lying out of his teeth. It sounds so crazy, but there is almost 0 chance there wasn't any teams willing to put a 1st out there for Boeser.
I don’t really see the point in getting angry about our ownership/management behaving in the same way as every other management group does in every other sport in the same situation.
No team would be doing what you’re suggesting when you’re in our position and sitting in the playoffs. A lot would have tried to add, if anything.
And it’s not just that people are a bit disappointed. It’s *hysterics* here this morning. Mrs. Lovejoy shit, because a team sitting in a playoffs spot didn’t significantly weaken their roster before the playoffs.