- Dec 13, 2009
- 22,578
- 34,978
Ilya MikheyevIf Beauvillier cost a 2nd....who would you have liked to buy at those prices? I would have preferred to sell, or make a hockey trade but buying at these prices was not a good plan IMO.
Ilya MikheyevIf Beauvillier cost a 2nd....who would you have liked to buy at those prices? I would have preferred to sell, or make a hockey trade but buying at these prices was not a good plan IMO.
I don't think you understand what I'm arguing. The decision to maximize cap ahead of the deadline happened before we knew what playoff position we would be in.I don't really think that's the point, I don't think you can really say you're overly serious about the playoffs sitting in the position the Canucks are with ~$14M in cap space, Hughes injured for some indeterminate amount of time, and Demko not skating. I mean, you can say you're maximizing revenue on remaining ticket sales and don't really care if you make the playoffs, I suppose.
They didn't want to give him what he wanted before.Allvin and Co still “evaluating” Boeser I guess.
I don't think you understand what I'm arguing. The decision to maximize cap ahead of the deadline happened before we knew what playoff position we would be in.
Even if we don't look good now, coming off of a contending season it would be ludicrous to not try to maximize cap space to compete again.
If we were expecting to not make the playoffs in the first place this would be a moot point.
if we got MP3 today instead of a month ago, you people would be hooting and hollering
See.
This is what I mean.
You were broken by the Benning era and now scold fans who have higher aspirations than "sending a message to SP holders." Or sneaking in to the playoffs.
It is completely fine to have this view you hold. But for the love of god stop making fun of the rest of us.
It’s clear that this organization is not committed to winning a cup but rather more concerned with “just getting in”.They didn't want to give him what he wanted before.
The only reason they do now is because they have to save face.
Organization run by idiots.
at this rate, they will still be evaluating Boeser when he retires.Allvin and Co still “evaluating” Boeser I guess.
It’s clear that this organization is not committed to winning a cup but rather more concerned with “just getting in”.
Then that's an entirely different point from what I was arguing.Yes, and I'm saying that's not the point. Obviously, how they planned it earlier in the season is not currently applicable. I'm saying it's fairly hard to make the case to fans you are serious about the playoffs doing what they did today. So they are not accruing assets and are not looking to improve their odds at the playoffs. They have for all intents and purposes, given up on the rest of this season without accruing any assets. I'm not sure I understand why anyone would do that.
This gets deadly comical if they end up missing the playoffs and then all the UFAs walk for nothing.
Carolina thinks this is a video game, that is why they suck every year, have no prospects, and are never a contend . . . oh, waitAm I missing something?
Canucks are currently in 9th place and sitting out of a playoff spot (8th by Point Percentage I guess, but the games still have to be played). Moneypuck has them at 39% Playoff odds as of today. If they don't start stringing together some wins, their season will be over in a hurry. Also factor in that their best player is injured, their best goaltender is injured, and their best forward has been MIA for a calendar year and the odds start looking stacked against.
I am not overly disappointed from today as the Canucks are a very predictable franchise. Call it a misunderstanding of sports or business or whatever, but it's a recurring pattern that the franchise has been stuck in for over a decade. They are willing to sacrifice a long-term vision for short-term results, most of which have been questionable at best.
Carolina made probably the biggest move of the day contrary to this very argument. They traded their best forward during a playoff race for a collection of high-picks and a young center. Add this to their already impressive prospect group and they are looking very stable moving forward. Criticize their decision all you want, but the move was made with the future in mind and to ensure they remain competitive.
Now if the Canucks stumble and these players walk, I am not overly optimistic they can improve the roster for next season with their limited asset base. It is what it is at this point, but the vision for me is starting to crumble. They have a very limited window to improve enough to convince their Franchise player to sign a long-term contract and now they are likely to take a step back in trying to complete this goal. Regardless of your opinion, I don't think anyone here has more optimism than when the day started.
... as opposed to wondering why they traded the team's 1C a month ago when they were also still fighting for a playoff spot?If we got mp3 today I'd be wondering why they traded the team' 1C at the deadline and yet kept the Boeser and Suter. Wouldn't you?
This has nothing to do with Jim Benning. If we were in 8th in 2016 I would have defended to high heaven the decision not to trade Hamhuis.
Again : this is how sports works. Teams in playoff positions do not sell. Having tantrums because the universal truths of pro sports have continued to hold is … weird, and pointless.
Carolina thinks this is a video game, that is why they suck every year, have no prospects, and are never a contend . . . oh, wait
Nevermind
Carolina sold the biggest piece today, so I'm not sure why you keep stating this as fact. Colorado "sold" Rantanen when they are in WC1 spot.This has nothing to do with Jim Benning. If we were in 8th in 2016 I would have defended to high heaven the decision not to trade Hamhuis.
Again : this is how sports works. Teams in playoff positions do not sell. Having tantrums because the universal truths of pro sports have continued to hold is … weird, and pointless.