We just saw two teams firmly in a playoff picture, trade away one of the best wingers in the league when they knew he wouldn't, or they couldn't get him signed. That would be the Avs first and then the Hurricanes trading away Mikko Rantanen.
How is that not the same situation the Canucks were facing with Brock Boeser? Management has literally stated they're not going to lose players for nothing, and yet here we are. I don't understand the continual pattern of hamstringing your team that seems to happen with this organization.
Trading Boeser isn't "burning it down", it's a pragmatic approach to improving your team, and there's ample evidence that trading underperforming players actually improves your team., while keeping a guy who's checked out makes the team cohesion worse.
While there's no real argument to be made comparing Benning to Ruthervin, this one habit seems built into this organization and it's incredibly stupid. If Boeser had have been traded today, I doubt anyone would have complained about it and everyone would have supported managements decision. Why anyone is on board with decisions that actively make succeeding more difficult is beyond me.
We are 8th in the West in points %.
Your position in your first post was that you were upset that bad ownership prevented us from selling.
Calgary could have traded Vladar. Utah had Cole and Bjugstad as pending UFAs and re-signed Cole.
And it isn’t just this year. Teams don’t sell when they’re sitting in the playoffs.
No they didn'tAside from a few bright spots, Rutherford and Allvin completely fumbled this entire season from beginning to end. Completely inexcusable.
Right shot + 2.8m instead of 3.2m on the books for next season.
Yes, someone will still pay himDoes anyone actually think Brock can get 7 year term in the open market?
Is this so?Rumour is that the Canucks are for sale in which case ownership probably wants to show the best financials (i.e., playoffs) as possible to any would be purchaser.
if we got MP3 today instead of a month ago, you people would be hooting and hollering
Does anyone actually think Brock can get 7 year term in the open market?
Not all situations are built equally. This is Utah HC's first year in Utah, they have a reason to want to make the playoffs to build excitement in the fanbase.
Our 3 franchise pillars are all hurt (Hughes, Pettersson, Demko) to varying degrees, with the most important cog being Quinn who the coach has said is going to have to battle it throughout the year. The game vs the Ducks was huge, considering they've been gaining ground in the stands + the embarrassing way we lost to them last week, and he wasn't healthy enough to go for that. That speaks volumes about his health. This year was a punt worthy season.
You don't see the point because you'd prefer the team to compete each year they reasonably can, and that's fine, I am not critical of your preference. But again, there is nothing wrong with a fan preferring their team take a longer term view especially when you consider that longer term view is more likely to yield better results. There is nothing surprising or unreasonable about a group of people being upset when their interests are not being catered to by another group that is catering to their own self interest. Like, its pretty fair and reasonable.
And sure, there are overreactions. But this is a an internet forum, so hardly surprising.
Rumour is that the Canucks are for sale in which case ownership probably wants to show the best financials (i.e., playoffs) as possible to any would be purchaser.
if we got MP3 today instead of a month ago, you people would be hooting and hollering
It’s not even about what I ‘prefer’.
Even if I rated picks/prospects much higher than I do and really felt that the best thing for the franchise in a vacuum was to trade Boeser … I wouldn’t be upset that they didn’t because I understand that there is basically zero chance that they were going to send a message to their SP holders (who they are going to be in a massive fight to retain after last year’s price increases) that they were quitting on the season with 18 games left while they were sitting in the playoffs.
the teams we're fighting with for a WC spot also did nothing. guess i'll check their boards to see if their fans are also up in arms about thisBut we didn't. We did get him a month ago, we know Quinn Hughes is hurt, we're tumbling down the standings to the point that what was looking like a safe lead over the rest of the West has now turned into an actual race.
With the knowledge we have today, today's lack of moves is a disaster.
The only problem with that is there is no real set of moves that could upgrade this team massively. Unless Lekkerimaki comes into next season looking like a 30 goal scorer and Willander is a very good #3, we're in for a very dark future when Quinn inevitably informs management he has 0 intentions of signing an extension - the groundwork is already being laid out with Rutherford saying that they might have to strip the team down if this core can't figure it out (He said that after saying they want to figure out a way to keep Quinn around for his entire career), and Quinn's agent saying he wants to win.
We are .001% better than Calgary but still have to win that game in hand otherwise Calgary beats us out in a tiebreaker. This isn’t a “playoff” team, it’s a bubble team fighting with 3 others and apparently already made their best offer for Brock and are almost certainly going to be priced out on Suter. Considering the prices that were paid for considerably lesser assets I think there’s a very good chance we look at today as a mistake.We are 8th in the West in points %.
honestly doubt he will get max term, unless it's like one of those drastically lower the AAV type of dealYes, someone will still pay him
But we didn't. We did get him a month ago, we know Quinn Hughes is hurt, we're tumbling down the standings to the point that what was looking like a safe lead over the rest of the West has now turned into an actual race.
With the knowledge we have today, today's lack of moves is a disaster.