Why are people assuming Jost has hit his ceiling?
He's improved every year so far.
He's not a #3C on a contending team with a low-end #2C like Kadri/Danault on the team. However, he'd be perfectly acceptable #3C if we had Hertl/Couts/etc. as our #2C. So it depends on what route we take, but I don't see the Avs getting enough center depth where Jost is our #4C without significantly sacrificing other areas of the team. IMO our biggest needs moving forward are:
1. #1G - Mainly because we don't have anyone if Gru walks. Need to figure out who his replacement is, because we can't head into next season with Francouz/JoJo tandem.
2A. 2nd pairing D - Two issues here -
- figuring out if keeping G is the right move or trading him to shore up the #2C position, or a #2/3 (Jones) that can perform in the playoffs. There may be an internal replacement in Byram/Timmins here as well, but our transition was one of our biggest issues against Vegas because Girard wilted, once again.
- if we are keeping G, it's a priority to find him a suitable partner.
2B. #2C - Are we keeping Kadri in hope he rebounds and isn't an idiot in the playoffs, or do we salvage what value we can get from him and sign Danault/trade for a higher end #2C like Hertl?
3. #1/2 LW - Landy/Bura aren't cutting it, and I think it would be a failure if we went into next season with both of them on the team again. If Landy is re-signed, they'll be taking up at least ~$13 mil in cap space, they simply don't bring enough.
4. Depth forwards - Donskoi, Compher are overpaid for what they bring to the playoffs. Nuke and Jost try hard, but can't product. Very few of our bottom 6 play a simply, heavy game. We have a bunch of internal replacements in Newhook, Ranta, Kaut, etc. but they are question marks.
5. Bottom pairing defenseman - Do we need a grittier defenseman at the expense of transition?