flyfysher
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2012
- 6,693
- 5,389
Bingo.
Never mind that I inserted Kopitar as the C next to Hall and not Kadri.
Bingo.
I mean adding both of them would be next to impossible cap wise.Never mind that I inserted Kopitar as the C next to Hall and not Kadri.
Who knows what they'll do but Dallas might decide to rebuild. Pavelski is 36 and one year left on his deal, they might want futures and it opens up a protection slot the stars need. He's making over his cap hit in real dollars this year, so I don't think Dallas will retain. He's also been durable.I’d take pavelski in a heart beat for sure.
Who knows what they'll do but Dallas might decide to rebuild. Pavelski is 36 and one year left on his deal, they might want futures and it opens up a protection slot the stars need. He's making over his cap hit in real dollars this year, so I don't think Dallas will retain. He's also been durable. Being under contract for a year doesn't interfere with MacKinnon's raise and doesn't clog up the spot for Newhook long term.
An additional scenario is if the Stars expose him to Seattle as expected, you trade them enough to forget about Khudobin and flip Pavelski.
He's missed 23 games this decade and doesn't blow up the cap in two years. I don't see why everyone is writing off Newhook.Joe Pavelski? No thanks. Guy turns 37 this summer and doesn't fit this team's identity at all.
Joe Pavelski? No thanks. Guy turns 37 this summer and doesn't fit this team's identity at all.
We still want to play fast and keep this team's identity while adding to it, not adding Jarome Iginla types.
Scored 25 goals last year.Thank God Sakic learned from those. Stuart, Iginla, Beuch.
He really is invisable.It's weird how none of these mock lineups have Stastny listed.
Hell, I thought we were desperate to change that.If it didn’t take a big-ticket prospect or player and they made the cap work, I’d take Joey Pavs in a heartbeat. Elite defensively and in the faceoff dot. Also quite possibly the best net-front guy on the power play you could ever hope for. There would be NO stopping the Avs on the man advantage with him either in the Landeskog or bumper slot.
And I think he’d fit the team identity just fine.
Jarome Iginla scored 30 goals the year before we signed him.Scored 25 goals last year.
And plummeted to 29 his first year here.Jarome Iginla scored 30 goals the year before we signed him..
I think Seattle 100% takes a player from our active roster. No doubt they're going to pick random scrubs from teams they don't feel like picking a player from, but I don't think that'll be us.
The question is, do the Avs protect Logan O'Connor or expose him and risk losing what surely looks like a phenomenal 4th liner that fits this team's identity to a tee? Because if he's exposed, I think Seattle looks at him and only him.
You Make Him Available!Is Crouse available?
LOC had to play 29 games to be eligible to be exposed. So I think he is safely an Av player through the draft. However, that might have been merely to fulfill the mandate of exposing legit NHL players. I would protect LOC over many of the players on the various lists in this forum
You Make Him Available!
He puts it in the net almost as much as Girard! You keep adding until Zzona caves!
No Danault?Add Crouse, Zadorov and Renouf and we should be good!