PowerMac
Registered User
- Dec 20, 2019
- 629
- 370
Need to replace Graves, Bura, and G (don’t care about his contract l, he isn’t make for playoffs).
If this playoffs has prove anything is that we have a top 4 D in Timmy if he’s able to stay healthy. He going up against the Blues and Knights and didn’t even flinch under pressure.
The Avs just need to make little fixes, get a few people who play a physical game and with better hockey IQ.
And the amount of opportunities that were tailor made for him he should have scored 59.And plummeted to 29 his first year here.
And the less you spend on a new 2C leaves more for Seth Jones, Matthew Danault and Lawson Crouse.
I don't understand the Girard hate. He did not have a good series against Vegas. But he was also playing on his off side, and playing with Graves, which was a poor match. But imagine if he was paired, on his preferred Left Side, with a healthy EJ. Just an entirely different situation. Girard also got shifted with Nemeth who, aside from Satan himself, was the worst pairing for Girard.
I’d easily protect him even if he only ends up a very good 4th liner. He adds a dimension the Avs just don’t have enough of, while not detracting from anything that defines them as a team. The ONLY forwards I would protect ahead of him for sure are the top line guys, Kadri, and Nichushkin.
he was so largely out muscled it was almost hard to witness. He was also playing like he was scared to get hit. Last 4 games -9 and some of them were absolute stinker plays. We have enough puck moving dmen, I love girard but he would return a valuable piece that is more of a need.
LOC is going to be a good 4th liner but I wouldn't protect him over Jost. He's not more valuable than a serviceable 3C.
LOC is going to be a good 4th liner but I wouldn't protect him over Jost. He's not more valuable than a serviceable 3C.
He's not a serviceable 3CLOC is going to be a good 4th liner but I wouldn't protect him over Jost. He's not more valuable than a serviceable 3C.
He's not a serviceable 3C
The opportunity cost of getting rid of a worse player making more would be a huge loss.Yeah he is, especially in the postseason.
If the Avs lose Jost in the XD that’s no huge loss.
Hmmm, a little more serviceable than Compher as a 2C.
The opportunity cost of getting rid of a worse player making more would be a huge loss.
Same reason you protect LOC.That I agree with.
If G is put in a position to succeed he will do it. Put him in, say, Montreal and he's not seeing any PK, plays PP1, gets mostly ozone starts and is well protected physically as their only small dman and their only pmd on the team.
Here he's asked to play like he's 6'2 man and he isn't one. Never will be.
I used Montreal as an example but there's at least a dozen teams in the league that could use Girard in a good way without getting most of the bad side.
I really dont like the idea of Jost as a 3C. Keep him around as a 4C sure, and maybe he plays his way up the lineup next year. But IMO going into next season with him as the 3C again is a big failure. His defensive game is fine, he works like a dog every shift(Thanks to Nichushkin for getting him like that IMO)... But the offensive ability just isn't good enough to produce at an acceptable level for a 3C.
It's why I like the idea of getting a legit 2C, and instead of trading Kadri, slot him in as the 3C instead. Kadri's 4.5M cap hit is still fine money for a 3C, and it also takes a lot of pressure off Kadri to produce(His production was low for a 2C this year as well)... And if/when Kadri goes idiot mode in the playoffs again next year we're much better equipped to handle it.