Izzy Goodenough
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2020
- 2,816
- 2,687
Star production?
Questions time, how much would Flames be willing to retain, would three teams being involved make a difference, what would the Flames be looking for in return?Star production?
dont see any team jumping in to be 3rd party broker of 8 years, thats an insane timeframe to be saddled with a cap hit and retention slot for guy never played for you. I cant see a 1st being enough sweetner for 3rd team.This is only the first year of a 8 year contract at 10.5M per year and he will be 38 when his current contract ends.
The going rate for top line offensive players is around $1M per 10 points.
Last year Huberdeau was putting up points at a 5.5M per year clip.
This year he his putting up points at approximately a 4.0 M per year clip.
Based on the metrics of this ratio, the Flames would have to be able to retain around 65% of his contract to make it have a positive value.
This isn't possible, 50% is the maximum they could retain. If they laundered his contract through a 3rd party, say a team that need to make the cap floor, they could reach a positive value.
Would any intermediary team retain 2.6M for 8 years and what recipient team would keep him on their roster at 2.6M for 8 years?
But at what cost to the Flames in other assets?
Maybe he is the next occupant of Robadas Island:
So Where Exactly Is the Maple Leafs’ Robidas Island?
I have been covering the Toronto Maple Leafs for six seasons now. However, every once in a while, something new pops up that I had not heard of. That happened this past week when it was repeatedly noted that goalie Matt Murray was shipped to “Robidas Island” as a result of his move to long-term...www.yardbarker.com
Bad teams are typically rebuilding teams. No rebuilding team is taking Huberdeau.A bad team might take a chance on him. But flames would have to pay to get rid of him. I would just keep him if I was Calgary. Maybe he can regain his game.
What if it comes with a first?Bad teams are typically rebuilding teams. No rebuilding team is taking Huberdeau.
A first for every year remaining on his contract? Then maybe.What if it comes with a first?
GMs need to stop signing 30yo to 8 year huge contractsThe NHL needs to get away from fully guaranteed contracts.
This is a Scientific fact.GMs need to stop signing 30yo to 8 year huge contracts
A bad team might take a chance on him. But flames would have to pay to get rid of him. I would just keep him if I was Calgary. Maybe he can regain his game.
a bad team today will be a totally different team in 6/7/8 years
johnny hockey signed there, if there is a good deal players will sign. how is a 30yo with 8 years left a reclaimation project, guys dont revert back to 27yo self at 35. not saying hube cant be productive in his 30s just not to warrant that deal, esp on a team he did nothing for. crosby or ovi get big deals late in their career from the team they played with ok, why would columbus or anyone not florida give hube anythingA team that has trouble signing FAs would do it. Columbus maybe would talk themselves into the reclaimation project for example. But yeah 7.5 years of term makes it a stay away for the vast majority of teams.
crappy thing and i feel for Calgary fans is GM who did that crazy deal bolts after ink is dryGMs need to stop signing 30yo to 8 year huge contracts
for a year or three not for 8like all of them would take huberdeau for 5m
Better keep adding more 1st because one isn't gonna come close to doing it.What if it comes with a first?
NHL contracts aren't fully guaranteed. The team can terminate the contract and buy out the remaining value for a fraction of the full cost.The NHL needs to get away from fully guaranteed contracts.
Got to have something to dream about as an Oilers fanImagine if Calgary paid the Panther's 2 1st round picks to take Huberdeu's contract with 1/2 retention.