Aho had Selke nominations. Nylander couldn't be further from the Selke and isn't a C. It's not comparable at all imo
Matthew Tkachuk just signed his 8 year X $9.5 mil and lead his team to the SCF.He is probably worth 9.5 easy. Everyone talking about huge cap raises made these guys take pause and ensure they get a fair contract. This guy just held out to recive one of the best team value contracts in the NHL. He won’t be making that mistake again and he is in zero rush to sign anything
Tkachuk signed for $9.5 million in FLORIDAMatthew Tkachuk just signed his 8 year X $9.5 mil and lead his team to the SCF.
I don't think there is a universe where paying Nylander = or more that Tkachuk would align with market value. IMO
Heck Marner shouldn't even be getting MT cap equivalency.
That is totally irrelevant as the Salary Hard Cap is the same in all 32 markets. there is no tax adjustment component in each market to impact the Cap differently,Tkachuk signed for $9.5 million in FLORIDA
Mess...can you tell us what Nylander would have to get paid in Toronto for their take-home pay to be equivalent?
We can and we will!That is totally irrelevant as the Salary Hard Cap is the same in all 32 markets. there is no tax adjustment component in each market to impact the Cap differently,
Leafs aren't forced to pay players more money that eat up more Cap space for less production simply to adjust for taxes in different States and different Provinces.
There are other ways like front loaded contracts and large signing bonuses that get the money up front to the player and through smart financial investing & interest earned and capital gains earnings to make up for Salary and income taxes adjustments.
The player comp is based on impact on the team and his performance not the bottom line on his take home pay after taxes.
He was an RFA wasn’t he? I can’t remember but if the cap goes up 4 million after this year and it’s 2 years after Matt signed.That is totally irrelevant as the Salary Hard Cap is the same in all 32 markets. there is no tax adjustment component in each market to impact the Cap differently,
Leafs aren't forced to pay players more money that eat up more Cap space for less production simply to adjust for taxes in different States and different Provinces.
There are other ways like front loaded contracts and large signing bonuses that get the money up front to the player and through smart financial investing & interest earned and capital gains earnings to make up for Salary and income taxes adjustments.
The player comp is based on impact on the team and his performance not the bottom line on his take home pay after taxes.
What I will give you is that of all the Leafs core 4 players the Nylander contract is and will be the closest to market comparables and age the best over time.He was an RFA wasn’t he? I can’t remember but if the cap goes up 4 million after this year and it’s 2 years after Matt signed.
It was also his first season over the 1 PPG so he took the safe contract and got payed well.
40 goal 80+ point players are landing big money these days
Matt didn’t produce at all in the playoffs before the contract was signed Stone was also close to Nylander production LA just signed a guy that has never hit 30g or 65 points for 8+
Meir has never hit PPG and just came off a 66 point season and he is getting almost 9.
9.5 for a young 40 goal UFA is a bargain in 3 years if cap projections are true.
Sorry is that the $9M Nylander contract or the $10M one? His actual market comparables are apparently not close to his asking price. I agree at 9ish he could show excellent value but above that you are getting into a group of Marner or better players making underv$10M.What I will give you is that of all the Leafs core 4 players the Nylander contract is and will be the closest to market comparables and age the best over time.![]()
Answer the question....are you capable of doing that? OR do you just exist to present the most elementary answers?That is totally irrelevant as the Salary Hard Cap is the same in all 32 markets. there is no tax adjustment component in each market to impact the Cap differently,
Leafs aren't forced to pay players more money that eat up more Cap space for less production simply to adjust for taxes in different States and different Provinces.
There are other ways like front loaded contracts and large signing bonuses that get the money up front to the player and through smart financial investing & interest earned and capital gains earnings to make up for Salary and income taxes adjustments.
The player comp is based on impact on the team and his performance not the bottom line on his take home pay after taxes.
Only by comparison to Matthews, Marner, and Tavares.11×8 for nylander seems fair
I think you need to have a line in the sand. I agree that ideally we don't trade 2+ of these guys, but we also can't just give them anything they want.
Let's say the contract demands are (Matthews/Marner wanting the shorter contracts due to age and that they're less likely to have just come off a career year):
- Matthews 4 years X 14M
- Nylander 8 years X 10M
- Marner 4 years X 13M
Can we win if we sign those? Can we win if we sign two of those and trade just one of them? Matthews and Marner after their 4 years would obviously be looking for big raises again.
So I think we just need to be willing to trade any of these guys, if the contract demands are too absurd. Maybe that triggers a heavy retool/rebuild, but the alternative isn't great either. You need to think about the overall team culture those types of contracts create too, and not just the cap headaches they create.
That is totally irrelevant as the Salary Hard Cap is the same in all 32 markets.
Answer the question....are you capable of doing that? OR do you just exist to present the most elementary answers?
Expecting players to take the same AAV as comparative players that play in tax-haven states is so ridiculous. Every time I come back to this site you're always talking crazy.
In 2017 I was excited.
Seeing MNM come into the league and do so well had me seeing visions of Stanley in the near future.
That all changed once Nylander held out for max money. Maybe that's where the disgust starts. That and the fact he made $12M to score 7 goals in 54 games on his return.
Now looking for even an even bigger payday.
Just once after another poor showing I'd really like to hear Keefe say something like this when asked what Nylander brings to the team each night: "Nothing! He brings nothing to the table! Ok? Truth is I wanted to get rid of this lazy turd years ago, but my idiot GM promised not to trade him".
Who does that anyway?
Who gives the longest holdout in modern day history a verbal promise not to be traded, and then actually keeps the promise?
Thank god Treliving is under no such obligation. Regardless if Nylander signs an extension or not. There is nothing preventing Treliving from signing Nylander and then trading him sometime this year afterwards.
If that happened, the only way I could be more excited is if they actually won the cup.
I wonder how many points Marner puts up on another team that doesn't have similar ilk of players like matthews and nylander taking some offensive pressure off of him in regular season.
I bet Marner's playoff performance would improve if he were on another team. Most other teams have more tenacity on their top lines, this would help Marner from disappearing when games get physical.
You have to factor in the cap hit though. How many teams are going to be able to surround Marner with "grit" in their top 6 with Marner's cap hit.
That would mean Marner will have to carry linemates offensively and not have another double digit AAV on his line to produce. Both Matthews and Marner are paid like they can carry someone on their line and don't require each other to produce like McDavid or Draisaitl. But the evidence seems to suggest that they cannot do that. Only Nylander had shades of it when he was centered by Kerfoot in the habs series and even then it fizzled out in latter games.
Marner's giveaways in the playoffs have hurt the Leafs tremendously too.
Ex: Game 7 against Habs score is 0-0 in 2nd period and Marner trying to make fancy crap turnsover the puck at the offensive blue line and the puck is back of our net. Forget about the 5 on 3 he gave the habs (forget which game) when he put the puck over the glass with no pressure on him.
Ex2: Game 6 OT against Tampa (first time) he makes a hail mary pass that gets intercepted and then proceeds to play like trash not defending well on the left wall followed by Holl sucking and Point scores
Ex3: Florida series Gm 2, tries to make fancy play, matthews doubles down on stupid and boom the puck is back of our net.
I mean eventually you have to question Marner's ability to make simple plays and not screw the team in tight situations too
Lol Matthew Tkachuk literally couldn't even lead his team to the playoffs, thankfully penguins lost and they made it by luck... marner lead his team to the playoffs and had a decent playoff..... Tkachuk also couldn't even do anything in playoffs in Calgary but a decent playoff this year and be is God lollll.Matthew Tkachuk just signed his 8 year X $9.5 mil and lead his team to the SCF.
I don't think there is a universe where paying Nylander = or more than Tkachuk would align with market value. IMO
Heck Marner shouldn't even be getting MT cap equivalency.