nuck
Registered User
- Aug 18, 2005
- 11,751
- 2,759
I get where you are coming from but the cost to the club is the same no matter where they are. If the tax haven job is available a player can go for it, but if there isn't such an opening why does the club need to make themselves into the same kind of landing spot? What happens after you write the cheque isn't your problem.Answer the question....are you capable of doing that? OR do you just exist to present the most elementary answers?
Expecting players to take the same AAV as comparative players that play in tax-haven states is so ridiculous. Every time I come back to this site you're always talking crazy.
A player will obviously prefer it but the team doesn't have to offer that. If you lose that player over a few hundred K then you have lost them. You have to balance that against having millions less to fill out your lineup. If you do that once to steal away a teams best player who becomes your best player, you can certainly make a business case. To do that any time an expensive talent asks is just going to hurt the team because Willie isn't 14% more productive than someone making the same gross salary in Florida.
To do that for all your players which would be the fair way, leaves you down $10M in available cap. The Leafs can't afford to match with other tax jurisdictions for Willie. They already have to do that with Mitch and AM and those two aren't tradeable now.