wetcoast
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2018
- 24,825
- 11,666
Welp 2 tonight. Back on track I guess.
My Canucks are off to a very bad start, no idea on the direction of this team to be honest.
Welp 2 tonight. Back on track I guess.
Yeah but mcDavid is so fast that even if he looses some of his speed he's still going to be one of the faster players in the league. Just look at Selanne, super fast when he was young, but even if he lost some speed he was still able to be 8th in scoring at 40 and still lead his team in points at 41. So that's like 15 more years of McDavid being the best player on his team and maybe a few more if he hangs in there trying to win his first cup. The only thing that can derail McDavid is multiple serious injuries at this point.McDavid is amazing. But his game relies heavily on his speed combined with his hockey sense. Wheels are usually one of the first things to fall off with age historically.
It's not impossible he will hit 2000 points, but that will mean he is having 100+ point seasons well into his 30s
No, he not better at being durable and delivering huge hits or playing physical! If you lock Ovechkin and Crosby in a cage and make them fight, Crosby would be in serious trouble!Everything besides goal scoring Crosby is better
2000 points though is a huge hill as McDavid had 697 point in hid first 7 seasons he needs a run of 120-130 point season to build a cushion as unless the rules change he isn't scoring 100 point a season in his late 30s.Yeah but mcDavid is so fast that even if he looses some of his speed he's still going to be one of the faster players in the league. Just look at Selanne, super fast when he was young, but even if he lost some speed he was still able to be 8th in scoring at 40 and still lead his team in points at 41. So that's like 15 more years of McDavid being the best player on his team and maybe a few more if he hangs in there trying to win his first cup. The only thing that can derail McDavid is multiple serious injuries at this point.
No, he not better at being durable and delivering huge hits or playing physical! If you lock Ovechkin and Crosby in a cage and make them fight, Crosby would be in serious trouble!
Backstrom is done, he'll never come back from the injury/surgery he's having and even if he does it will be entirely short lived. That aside, he has been on the downslide for awhile and last year basically gave them sub top 6 production in the half season he was there. Ovechkin meanwhile had his best season in a decade and was the first half MVP of last season. He's breaking that record man and the players around him don't have a ton to do with it.This thread topic comes up every couple of months on here, for about the past 5 years.
I'll repeat something I've said a few times before: I think Ovechkin's likelihood of scoring 895 RS goals depends on how good the Caps are.
That is, if the Caps are a strong team for the next few years, still making the playoffs handily and in competition, then I think Ovechkin keeps playing for five more seasons or whatever, even if he gets relegated to 2nd-line, 2nd-unit PP duty the final few. In that situation, the chances of his reaching 895 obviously increase.
On the other hand, if the Caps crash and burn this season and management decides to go into 'rebuild' mode -- or even if they don't, but Ovechkin's peers like Backstrom and Oshie retire or sign elsewhere and Ovi's teammates are all 15-20 years younger -- then I think Ovechkin's motivation drops hugely and he probably doesn't stick around long enough to reach the record.
A lot of long-term record chasing is contextual, and has little to do with the player's ability.
Sure bud.Gretzky's legacy on the other hand will take a hit too, as he will seem much more human after his record is broken.
I think you sorta missed my point.Backstrom is done, he'll never come back from the injury/surgery he's having and even if he does it will be entirely short lived. That aside, he has been on the downslide for awhile and last year basically gave them sub top 6 production in the half season he was there. Ovechkin meanwhile had his best season in a decade and was the first half MVP of last season. He's breaking that record man and the players around him don't have a ton to do with it.
He's going to hit 50 again this year and be right close to it and everyone is going to be saying the same stuff next season.
And Gretz will still be known to be number one.I think this is true of everyone who watched Ovechkin play.
But a few generations from now, when there's nobody alive who watched him play, there will be greater weight placed on the numbers and records.
Ovechkin is the best goal scorer that has ever played in NHL. Period.
Despite the 4 point game, if this year is any indication so far, he's not gonna get there.
Lemieux is one of the best and most dominant players ever, but if you compare the D Ovechkin had to face to what Lemieux faced. It is not close. In goal scoring department. It is too bad Mario had all those injuries. Could've been the best forward in history in numbers. Ovechkin has given much more. Mario was a big guy with good hands(Do not flame if I say that Mikko Rantanen looks much like him), but never gave the physicality that Ovechkin does.He is the greatest, by virtue of being among the best goal scorers ever, but the one who is having the best goalscoring career.
Best goal scorer though? He's in argument of maybe, but for my money Lemieux is #1
And Gretz will still be known to be number one.
He's already the best goal scorer ever. He's shooting pucks against goalies with .910 to .920 save percentages, which is more than likely in excess of what Gretzky faced. Getting "the number" is just gravy at this point.Will Ovi breaking Gretzky's goal scoring record change or influence his legacy?
Let's say if:
1) Ovi retires immediately & finish his goals total with 780
2) Ovi plays his remaining 4 seasons scoring at least 115 goals breaking Gretzky's record. And retires with 900+ goals.
Will breaking goal scoring record & finishing with 900 goals will change his legacy?
Or they will marvel at and ask themselves how the hell this Gretzky kid was able to be so far ahead of everyone else ......... and still is ?yes because context will be forgotten
Yup. Scoring may have been easier then but there are far more rules now to protect the players from injury. Equipment better now. Nutrition. Etc.Or they will marvel at and ask themselves how the hell this Gretzky kid was able to be so far ahead of everyone else ......... and still is ?
He is on pace for 30 goals which is respectable for a 37 year old.
2 PPG and 1 ESG. I think this is the year you start to see a shift of him being more of a power play specialist.
Will be interesting to see, probably not this year, if he ever gets moved from the 1st line. Don’t think it happens in the near future because the Capitals don’t have anyone near good enough to replace him coming up or in Washington already.
Despite the 4 point game, if this year is any indication so far, he's not gonna get there.
Lemieux is one of the best and most dominant players ever, but if you compare the D Ovechkin had to face to what Lemieux faced. It is not close. In goal scoring department. It is too bad Mario had all those injuries. Could've been the best forward in history in numbers. Ovechkin has given much more. Mario was a big guy with good hands(Do not flame if I say that Mikko Rantanen looks much like him), but never gave the physicality that Ovechkin does.
You talk about versatility, then go on to use breakaways (which aren't nearly as common in today's NHL) as your argument for who's a better goalscorer?Mario had a versatility to his goal scoring Ovechkin's not even remotely close to. Ask any given hockey fan who they would rather have on a game-deciding breakaway, Mario or Ovi, and not even the most delusional Caps fan would pick Ovechkin while still maintaining a straight face.
You talk about versatility, then go on to use breakaways (which aren't nearly as common in today's NHL) as your argument for who's a better goalscorer?
Odd.