67 others
Registered User
So human he could have scored 0 goals in his career and still be the all time points leader lolGretzky's legacy on the other hand will take a hit too, as he will seem much more human after his record is broken.
So human he could have scored 0 goals in his career and still be the all time points leader lolGretzky's legacy on the other hand will take a hit too, as he will seem much more human after his record is broken.
Ya and Ovy has a Cup. If he gets the goal record he will have a better legacy than Crosby.The whole point is to win cups. The WHOLE point. You queer for individual records? Follow tennis or golf.
If you had a choice--Caps win one more Cup before O retires, or he breaks the goal record--which do you choose?
I love the absolute certitude re something so subjective. People are funny.Ya and Ovy has a Cup. If he gets the goal record he will have a better legacy than Crosby.
Crosby is a great player but, outside of pens fans remembering his cups, what is so memorable about his career? Any significant records? Not really. 2 rosses which has been done by many players including his own team mate. 2 rockets is nothing memorable. 2 harts equalled/surpassed by many players including OV in his own era. There have been many "legacies" like Crosby: great captain, won individual trophies, won cups, best player in the game for a few years, etc. Happened many times before, will happen again. OV on the other hand will have the most goals ever, most rockets ever, most 50/45/40/30 goal seasons ever, most PPG goals ever, etc. That's a way bigger and more memorable legacy than whatever it is Crosby did.
This is not how statistical analysis is done. This is cherrypicking stats. In Gretzkys days, scoring was way easier due to, amongst other things, much smaller goalies, hence there were less shots required for scoring a goal. If you want to call this analysis you need to include a "shots neeeded per game" and "goals per game per team" criteria. Otherwise, you're willfully omitting statistics that will change the picture you are trying to present which would get you an F in statistics class
Yet more history revision.
NHL & WHA Single Season Leaders and Records for Adjusted Goals | Hockey-Reference.com
1. Brett Hull (78), 2. Alex Ovechkin (72), 3. Mario Lemieux (71), 4. Cooney Weiland (70), Phil Esposito (70), 6. Wayne Gretzky (69), 7. Babe Dye (68), Wayne Gretzky (68), Steven Stamkos (68), Auston Matthews (68)www.hockey-reference.com
Will Ovi breaking Gretzky's goal scoring record change or influence his legacy?
Let's say if:
1) Ovi retires immediately & finish his goals total with 780
2) Ovi plays his remaining 4 seasons scoring at least 115 goals breaking Gretzky's record. And retires with 900+ goals.
Will breaking goal scoring record & finishing with 900 goals will change his legacy?
With context Matthews' last season doesn't really rival Ovies 07-08 campaign. If you extrapolate Matthews' goalscoring to full season he would have had 67. Percentage lead over second in goals (Draisaitl) would've been 21.8 and percentage lead over 10th in goals 59.5.Matthews just had a season that rival any season Ovi ever had, Stamkos best season goalwise is not far off(if at all) from Ovechkins.
Adjusted stats residentsleeper.
Of course context is needed that's why there is even a discussion to be had, but how about the context that Gretzky scored 80+ goals while also scoring 200+ points, almost doubling Ovis total for most years? Imagine if he didn't pass as much and just launched shots at the net ala Ovechkin.
Now how much of that was depending on era? Hard to say but Gretzky stood out even more than Ovechkin compared to the others in terms of goalscoring. Matthews just had a season that rival any season Ovi ever had, Stamkos best season goalwise is not far off(if at all) from Ovechkins.
With context Matthews' last season doesn't really rival Ovies 07-08 campaign. If you extrapolate Matthews' goalscoring to full season..
When I look at those stats, it certainly shows that Matthews' season did rival Ovie's best.....maybe not better, but certainly comparable. Not really the point though. Ovie probably is the best goal scorer of all time. I don't think he's the most dominant scorer on a yearly basis...Gretzky certainly dominated the competition like no other. I always wonder what may have been had he not been hit from behind into the boards by Suter in 1991 (was 30 years old at the time)....never the same player after that.With context Matthews' last season doesn't really rival Ovies 07-08 campaign. If you extrapolate Matthews' goalscoring to full season he would have had 67. Percentage lead over second in goals (Draisaitl) would've been 21.8 and percentage lead over 10th in goals 59.5.
Compare that to Ovechkin in 07-08, he scored 25 percent more goals than second in goals (Kovalchuk), and 62.5 percent more than 10th.
In other words, Matthews managed to score two more goals when league-wide scoring was significantly higher. This is context.
So yeah, I would say Ovechkins 07-08 campaign (compared to his peers) is still more impressive than Matthews' last year, though it's very close to being equal. Matthews had an incredible year (definitely one of the best goalscoring seasons all time), don't get me wrong, this just goes to show how how otherworldly Ovechkins 07-08 season actually was.
Yeah but not for long. McDavid will surpass 2000 career points when it's all said and done.So human he could have scored 0 goals in his career and still be the all time points leader lol
I'll wait a few years before looking at how realistic that is. At first glance, doesn't look crazy to consider (but there is only 1 player to ever score that much)....will take many, many years to get there and a lot can happen in many years. McDavid is at about the same pace Crosby was at the same time in their careers (though Crosby had already gone through the major concussions).Yeah but not for long. McDavid will surpass 2000 career points when it's all said and done.
McDavid is amazing. But his game relies heavily on his speed combined with his hockey sense. Wheels are usually one of the first things to fall off with age historically.Yeah but not for long. McDavid will surpass 2000 career points when it's all said and done.
I'd still consider Ovy and Crosby basically dead even personally. Everything besides goal scoring Crosby is better, and he's not a slouch goal wise either. Plus playing centre. I find it hard to argue Crosby vs Ovechkin personally. They're such different players, two of the best ever, and influence and impact the game in such drastically different ways. I'd take Crosby over him personally any day, as I'd always take the elite centre above anything else, but they're apples and oranges to me.It will greatly improve ovechkin's legacy if he breaks the record and ends his career with 900+ goals. ovechkin is automatically a top 5 player all time and there's no chance of anybody trying to argue crosby over Ovechkin after that!
Gretzky's legacy on the other hand will take a hit too, as he will seem much more human after his record is broken.
900 goals was easily a foregone conclusion then, well close but nope.I'm just thinking time factor here, but it is interesting Gretzky broke Howe's record at age 33 in 1994 and put up another 90 odd goals over the next 5 years.
With context Matthews' last season doesn't really rival Ovies 07-08 campaign. If you extrapolate Matthews' goalscoring to full season he would have had 67. Percentage lead over second in goals (Draisaitl) would've been 21.8 and percentage lead over 10th in goals 59.5.
Compare that to Ovechkin in 07-08, he scored 25 percent more goals than second in goals (Kovalchuk), and 62.5 percent more than 10th.
In other words, Matthews managed to score two more goals when league-wide scoring was significantly higher. This is context.
So yeah, I would say Ovechkins 07-08 campaign (compared to his peers) is still more impressive than Matthews' last year, though it's very close to being equal. Matthews had an incredible year (definitely one of the best goalscoring seasons all time), don't get me wrong, this just goes to show how how otherworldly Ovechkins 07-08 season actually was.
Welp 2 tonight. Back on track I guess.I always smile when this argument comes up because it's not actually based on what any said player did in a season but how others did which is bass akwards right?
Adjusted stats is probably a better metric to compare seasons by really.