geo25
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2017
- 820
- 760
Include Keefe in the dealJust call Dubas and say Murray looks great, he seems poised for a big bounce back. Kyle has an eye for goalies.
Include Keefe in the dealJust call Dubas and say Murray looks great, he seems poised for a big bounce back. Kyle has an eye for goalies.
Honestly, both should be gone. We'll never get to the grail with these 2 ....nor with AM. They've proven multiple times they're unable/unwilling to do what it takes to win in the PO....why do we ( and more importantly mgmt kid ourselves)???Marner disappeared when we needed him. Nylander was embarrassing at times, needed to be sheltered and didn’t resemble anything you win a cup with.
Had to read up a bit. I can't find it explicitly stated in the CBA, but CapFriendly has this, and no reason to think they are wrong:The good old days, Pal.
My question/concern is 2 or 3 fold.
In the offseason there is a 10% overage slush fund for teams to exceed the hard cap ceiling so that means + $8.35 mil of which the Leafs are currently at. However I can't recall if offseason LTIR (Muzzin) is in addition to that, or was designed for exactly issues like that to be used in the 10%?,
1) Does that make the Leafs vulnerable to an Offersheet for Samsonov with no cap room to match?
2) If Sammy does take the Leafs to arbitration and the award is too high like say $6 mil would the Leafs walk away, ,making him a UFA and instead of buying out Murray he is the Leafs backup this year?
3) If Sammy does not choose Arb. then Leafs can't buyout Murray and must find a taker in trade or they will not have room to resign him.
Any on these valid issues or concerns?
Can LTIR be used in the off-season? LTIR FAQ - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Yes, LTIR can be used in the off-season while the 10% off-season cushion is active. LTIR in the off-season is calculated using the basic equation outlined above, which permits a team to exceed the off-season salary cap. To use off-season LTIR the team must provide doctors proof that the player in question will continue to be injured at the beginning of the regular season for 10 NHL games and 24 calendar days.
At the start of the season the teams LTIR relief & ACSL is recalculated when the 10% cushion is removed.
2020 MoU changed the hard and fast rule on the 35+'s, stumbled over it myself this week. Gio could retire and it would be gone. Rule was modified to more specifically target the long term back diving contracts it was meant to guard against in the first place. Gio on 2 years not front loaded is fine.Isn't Gio a +35 contract? even if he retires his cap hit will count. or do I have this wrong?
Had to read up a bit. I can't find it explicitly stated in the CBA, but CapFriendly has this, and no reason to think they are wrong:
So, given that, it doesn't seem like we are in an offseason cap crunch (yet), we should be eligible to go Cap+10%+Muzzin contract.. another $5 million or so I think... So I think 1 & 3 are covered by that. I can't imagine Sammy won't elect for arbitration though, surely the QO from the Leafs was the minimum $1.8 offer, he's not taking that.
#2 is a possibility though, right?
Is it 120%? Wasn’t sure, had settled on 100 as his base salary was over 1 million. What am I missing?Ilya Samsonov's QO offer is 2.160M. Leafs have tendered that. He has elected for arbitration.
That’s disappearing the whole Murray contract though, that’s the hard part right?Based on this roster, capfriendly says that the Leafs have just over 3M ($3,052,717) in cap space to sign Samsonov.
View attachment 726309
If oft-injured Mrazek only cost 13 spots dropped in the draft for 2 full years, it shouldn't cost as much for a goalie who can actually play top-notch for the 20-25 games he's healthy.That’s disappearing the whole Murray contract though, that’s the hard part right?
Here's hoping.If oft-injured Mrazek only cost 13 spots dropped in the draft for 2 full years, it shouldn't cost as much for a goalie who can actually play top-notch for the 20-25 games he's healthy.
I think the Leafs have made plans to either buy out or trade the contract.That’s disappearing the whole Murray contract though, that’s the hard part right?
Ilya Samsonov's QO offer is 2.160M. Leafs have tendered that. He has elected for arbitration.
I agree. Although Brodie has served the Leafs well, he faded badly as the season went on. He is going into the final year of his contract and I cannot envision the Leafs re-signing him.Brodie was horrible in the playoffs and the 2nd half of the season. Looks like his wheels fell off.
Age | Height | Weight | Birth Date | ||
Morgan Rielly44 | 29 | 6' 1" | 219 lbs | L | 03/09/1994 |
Mark Giordano55 | 39 | 6' 0" | 205 lbs | L | 10/03/1983 |
Jake McCabe22 | 29 | 6' 1" | 204 lbs | L | 10/12/1993 |
Conor Timmins25 | 24 | 6' 2" | 202 lbs | R | 09/18/98 |
Timothy Liljegren37 | 24 | 6' 0" | 198 lbs | R | 04/30/99 |
TJ Brodie78 | 33 | 6' 2" | 187 lbs | L | 06/07/1990 |
John Klingberg | 30 | 6' 2" | 180 lbs | R | 08/14/92 |
Age | Height | Weight | Birth Date | ||
Conor Timmins25 | 24 | 6' 2" | 202 lbs | R | 09/18/98 |
TJ Brodie78 | 33 | 6' 2" | 187 lbs | L | 06/07/1990 |
John Klingberg | 30 | 6' 2" | 180 lbs | R | 08/14/92 |
Morgan Rielly44 | 29 | 6' 1" | 219 lbs | L | 03/09/1994 |
Jake McCabe22 | 29 | 6' 1" | 204 lbs | L | 10/12/1993 |
Mark Giordano55 | 39 | 6' 0" | 205 lbs | L | 10/03/1983 |
Timothy Liljegren37 | 24 | 6' 0" | 198 lbs | R | 04/30/99 |
Age | Height | Weight | Birth Date | ||
Timothy Liljegren37 | 24 | 6' 0" | 198 lbs | R | 04/30/99 |
Conor Timmins25 | 24 | 6' 2" | 202 lbs | R | 09/18/98 |
Morgan Rielly44 | 29 | 6' 1" | 219 lbs | L | 03/09/1994 |
Jake McCabe22 | 29 | 6' 1" | 204 lbs | L | 10/12/1993 |
John Klingberg | 30 | 6' 2" | 180 lbs | R | 08/14/92 |
TJ Brodie78 | 33 | 6' 2" | 187 lbs | L | 06/07/1990 |
Mark Giordano55 | 39 | 6' 0" | 205 lbs | L | 10/03/1983 |
I think the Leafs are testing the waters to see if he would take his QO offer on a 1 yr deal to kick the can down the road. But now they have to wait to see what the arbitration award is to figure out the rest of of their cap situation.Some people believe Samsonov's # is going to come in around $3 mil this year.
If Sammy was going to take $3 mil wouldn't he already be signed, as it certainly wouldn't be Leafs side holding it up?
The player elected Arbitration decision seems to suggest both sides are not close in term or $$ this a 3rd party ruling on case.
I think the Leafs are testing the waters to see if he would take his QO offer on a 1 yr deal to kick the can down the road. But now they have to wait to see what the arbitration award is to figure out the rest of of their cap situation.
But I dont see the Leafs being able to pay Samsonov more than $3M.
I'd be okay with ending up with Lindholm. But he'd have to end up as our #2C, not third.I know there's been proposals for Hanifin and a couple other D-men for Nylander, but something different.
Brodie + Nylander for Zadorov + Lindholm as the base of the trade, maybe some picks involved. Saves us close to 3M in cap, also Lindholm is a right shot, could be tried on Tavares' wing if needed, or move Tavares to LW and have Lindholm as the C. I prefer the hypothetical lineup below, gives you a real checking line and great depth throughout the lineup. Looking at Vegas, they had 3 lethal lines capable of scoring and controlling the play.
Bertuzzi - Matthews - Marner
Knies - Tavares - X
Domi - Lindholm - Jarnkrok
Lafferty - Holmberg - Reaves
Rielly - X
McCabe - Liljegren
Zadorov - Timmins
Giordano
Brodie is still a decent D-man and pending UFA, played lots of years in Calgary. We likely won't be able to pay Nylander what he's asking for. We get Zadorov, a big physical D-man that plays with an edge. Lindholm also a pending UFA, but can fit under our cap. A good 2 way Center who also plays a tough game and we can actually have a realistic chance at re-signing him to something reasonable, in the 8M range.
It sucks so much how the NHL has come to this. Counting on injured players, buyouts, low-value trades, having to give away draft picks for Ufa mistakes, etc. It really is embarrassing.