I think this trade may require additional moves to stay cap compliant, I would propose the following:
To VGK: Eichel
To BUF: Tuch, Stephenson, Smith*, 2022 1st, 2023 1st
*VGK reacquire Smith after a series of trades......
To NSH: Smith (50% retained)
To BUF: NSH 3rd
Then.....
To VGK: Smith (25% of original contract after NSH retention)
To NSH: VGK 2nd, CHI 5th
Vegas top 6 of:
Patches-Eichel-Stone
Marchessault-Karlsson-Smith
WillThey would potentially run into the "tagging" rule where you can't go over the cap in future seasons by more than 10%, but I'm unsure how that works when players are on LTIR etc. Think that VGK simply has to dump a bunch of cap still to make this work.
All I do is trade, trade, trade no matter what (What)
Got ticket sales on my mind, I can never get enough ('Nough)
And every time I call up other GMs
Insider tweets go up
And they say where? (There), and they say where? (Yeah)
Where you gettin the cap there?? Up, down, up, down, up, down
'Cause all I do is trade (Trade), trade (Trade), trade
And if you not buying tickets, then we don't really care
VGK derps for biggest, shiniest toy it can get yet again. SMH. They should have just developed the centers they drafted instead of losing additional resources due to hastiness
Eichel is on IR not LTIR. So there are some cap issues. Flames would have to move out about 8.7mil for example. Im not sure you can technically trade someone on LTIR without them coming off it for administration purposes first. Thats definitely a question for the CBA gurus.Does right now.
Yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean they need to do it in an eichel trade. I'm sure they could find a team willing to pay them a mid round pick to take on a bad contractWill
Buffalo need to take salary back to stay above the cap floor?
Your energy, plus Eichel looking like Beavis, I am getting major Great Cornholio vibes here.Damn it I’m hyped on coffee guys!!!! I need his ass now!!!!!
They would potentially run into the "tagging" rule where you can't go over the cap in future seasons by more than 10%, but I'm unsure how that works when players are on LTIR etc. Think that VGK simply has to dump a bunch of cap still to make this work.
They said that when they got stone, and when they got Petro… they’re making the same mistake the sharks did and trying to go top heavy. It reeks of desperation for a fanbase losing interest and pieces on LtIR. This is a blatant distraction to keep the fans interested.
Will
Buffalo need to take salary back to stay above the cap floor?
Right, I agree, which why is said Vegas is in no position to give up a roster player in a trade, unless they are signalling they are giving up on this year.There's absolutely no way Vegas can stay cap compliant adding Eichel without sending major salary back to Buffalo. There most certainly is a roster player or two heading to Buffalo if Eichel is going to Vegas. Dadonov, maybe?
They would potentially run into the "tagging" rule where you can't go over the cap in future seasons by more than 10%, but I'm unsure how that works when players are on LTIR etc. Think that VGK simply has to dump a bunch of cap still to make this work.
With Pacioretty and Tuch on the IR, Vegas has nearly 6 million in cap space, so now would be a good time to make it happen...
Krebs would almost certainly be involved, likely a 1st rd pick as well...
To Vegas: Eichel
To Buffalo: L.V.'s 2022 1st, L.V.'2 2023 1st, Krebs, Dadonov
Have they won anything yet? Have they even made a cup since?Yeah what terrible moves those have turned out to be
They only have around 73m committed to next season so far.
I read that last sentence as '..due to tastiness'VGK derps for biggest, shiniest toy it can get yet again. SMH. They should have just developed the centers they drafted instead of losing additional resources due to hastiness
Eichel seems like a cool ranch kind of guyI bet Eichel himself is on the couch right now with a bag of doritos furiously refreshing twitter every 30 seconds waiting for the trade to be official.