MarkusKetterer
Shoulda got one game in
So Vegas having a hard time with the finances of this trade. Huh, who would have thought?
It’s almost like the Sabres aren’t gonna trade Eichel for an even more reduced price than they originally are.
So Vegas having a hard time with the finances of this trade. Huh, who would have thought?
There's risk with neck surgery period. Stop acting like a morally superior jilted lover.
In this case I don't think that's the issue, it's more making the money work. The more Vegas players keep getting injured the less likely this trade becomes.It’s almost like the Sabres aren’t gonna trade Eichel for an even more reduced price than they originally are.
The longer this goes, the lesser the return is going to be.
There’s no way Vegas, Calgary, or Anaheim didn’t offer the package that eventually gets accepted back in August, when Eichel could’ve had his surgery and been ready in time for Christmas.
Every day that goes by decreases the chance that he’s even able to come back and help for the playoffs.
So if the ask is multiple impact roster players, + blue chip prospects, + 1st round picks, for a player that may not even be able to help you this season, that deal isn’t getting done.
It matters to buffalo as well though. They have to get back around ~$5 million in salary to remain cap compliant.The ask is prospects and 1sts. The addition of a roster player is more of a “cap dump” than a part of the return that Buffalo wants.
The ask is prospects and 1sts. The addition of a roster player is more of a “cap dump” than a part of the return that Buffalo wants.
The longer this goes, the lesser the return is going to be.
I agree on McTavish -- I'd take him over Krebs in a heartbeat. Same with Newhook and Eklund obviously. Zary, meh, maybe.I’ve seen idiots say krebs is a better prospect than mctavish. I would rather have zary as well, I just don’t see krebs being anything more than a 2nd line center
Guessing Dadanov and a 1st from Vegas goes to Zona and then a bunch of assets to BuffaloJust comes down to which bad contracts Arizona is taking and what they get for it.
I feel the opposite. The more guys get injured the less Vegas can afford to move multiple pieces for another injured player.with the amount of cap Vegas can out on LTIR it could help this out.
I'm increasingly of the same mind too as this drags on. I've seen some Sabres fans say it's ridiculous to saddle yourself to a couple million for 5 years for a player who won't be on the team...and I get that perspective. But at the same time, teams do exactly that all the time with buyouts? Even ignoring the recent Suter and Parise examples...last season Nashville bought out Turris. His buyout has a cap of of $2 million per year until 2028 (8 years total). Martin Jones' buyout lasts for 6 years at between 1.6 to 2.9 million cap hit until 2027. Considering the Sabres are trading Jack freaking Eichel, a guy who was supposed to be their superstar and whose return should matter very much for the future of the team, I'm kinda surprised they won't accept a couple million on the books in order to bring in more suitors + correspondingly increase the return. Because other teams do it pretty frequently with buyouts just to get a crappy player off the club.I still think the Sabres are being dumb by not being willing to retain.
You can very likely get another 1st round pick or an equivalent prospect if you retain like $2 million on Eichel's deal. If your cap structure gets messed up because of a $2 million cap penalty as the cap is skyrocketing towards $100 million, you shouldn't be a GM of a team to begin with.
It matters to buffalo as well though. They have to get back around ~$5 million in salary to remain cap compliant.
If that’s the case, why isn’t it done?
I’ve heard they want everything from Lindholm, Hanifin, Mangiapane, Dube, Theodore, Tuch, a bunch of stuff they shouldn’t remotely be concerned with.
1st, Pelletier/Zary, Coronato, cap dump (Zadorov, say) - what else do you need?
How good does Buffalo really think Peyton Krebs is? He was a 17th overall pick.
It’s almost like the Sabres aren’t gonna trade Eichel for an even more reduced price than they originally are.
This seems like an end result where he doesn’t end up in Vegas and Vegas says “we tried”, it didn’t work.” Idk if Calgary shakes things up now with the way they’re playing as it probably takes someone off the active roster. Anaheim has and still does make the most sense to me
Not a lot of teams sitting around with 10mil in cap on top of the fact that he's injured, currently in limbo and has a NMC kicking in next year.
If anything, it's almost like the Sabres waited too long and overplayed their hand
O don't think the Sabres will suspend Jack. What would be the grounds? Hopefully the Sabres and Vegas can come to an agreement, and Jack gets his preferred surgery and we see him playing like the great player he next year.Well yes. Hence why Eichel hasn’t been suspended yet. And despite what some HFSabres posters think, he won’t be suspended. Or at least not until you see the Sabres start picking up LTIR guys. The closest thing the Sabres did this off-season to that was acquire Butcher and a pick for nothing (yes I know he’s playing but he was a cap dump for the Devils). That and the hope they can flip him for an additional pick and/or prospect at the TDL.
My guess is those are players they see playing for the Sabres in the future. But my guess is that A: no blue chip guy was on the table to begin with to entice the Sabres to share medicals, and B: the Sabres do not want to trade Eichel to the Rangers, Boston or Montreal.
And if teams are saying “we’ll trade you our top prospect only if you retain XX” then Buffalo rightfully says no. Why should they? The price went from 4-6 pieces where the return was a top prospect and 1sts, to 4 pieces with a top prospect or 1sts being not involved, to now 4 pieces but the Sabres only get the top prospect or 1sts if they eat up to 50%, but they also have to take cap dumps? Why should the Sabres do that? If a team is acquiring Eichel they feel confident he’ll return close to 100%, so no point to giving even more of a discount.