Over the volcano
Registered User
No idea how he calculates that stuff but the defensive #'s are off the charts. Exactly the kind of thing you like to see from a 3rd liner
That's the thing. My critique on Freddy isn't specific to him. It's specific to the role he plays. I generally dislike the idea of overpaying for bottom of the roster types. That's how you get yourself into cap jail. Which we saw when they had to dump Hall for cap relief because Sweeney overpaid Forbort, Reilly, etc the year before. Seeing useful players like Bertuzzi leave and take a short term low dollar deal elsewhere was another example of why you don't pay those end of the roster players more than they're worth.That’s a pretty harsh assessment. I like freddy
And that's just more proof why advance stats are silly. Because if you watched him play, there's no shot in hell you'd say he's a defensive savant like the stats they're using do. It's like a few years back when advanced stats said Loui Eriksson was one of the best players in the entire league, when in reality he was nowhere close to even being one of the best players on the Bruins roster let alone the league.No idea how he calculates that stuff but the defensive #'s are off the charts. Exactly the kind of thing you like to see from a 3rd liner
I get the idea of discrediting stats that don't fit an argument.And that's just more proof why advance stats are silly. Because if you watched him play, there's no shot in hell you'd say he's a defensive savant like the stats they're using do. It's like a few years back when advanced stats said Loui Eriksson was one of the best players in the entire league, when in reality he was nowhere close to even being one of the best players on the Bruins roster let alone the league.
Nah, you think this is personal and it's not. I discredit advanced stats for any player because I think most folks use them incorrectly, simply to justify a position they've taken, and disregard the context. Nothing specific to Freddy and everything to do with the poster.I get the idea of discrediting stats that don't fit an argument.
I do think his defensive game is ++ and see him missing some offense because of it when watching him live. I've been looking for an even strength goal against/60 stat to measure him by and can't find one out there.
SureNah, you think this is personal and it's not. I discredit advanced stats for any player because I think most folks use them incorrectly, simply to justify a position they've taken, and disregard the context. Nothing specific to Freddy and everything to do with the poster.
Do you honestly think that 2.3 mil for 2 years is going to cause cap issues for them? even if you replace him at league min, 1.5 mil isnt enough to retain a guy like Bert or Hall.That's the thing. My critique on Freddy isn't specific to him. It's specific to the role he plays. I generally dislike the idea of overpaying for bottom of the roster types. That's how you get yourself into cap jail. Which we saw when they had to dump Hall for cap relief because Sweeney overpaid Forbort, Reilly, etc the year before. Seeing useful players like Bertuzzi leave and take a short term low dollar deal elsewhere was another example of why you don't pay those end of the roster players more than they're worth.
And that's just more proof why advance stats are silly. Because if you watched him play, there's no shot in hell you'd say he's a defensive savant like the stats they're using do. It's like a few years back when advanced stats said Loui Eriksson was one of the best players in the entire league, when in reality he was nowhere close to even being one of the best players on the Bruins roster let alone the league.
I 100% agree with you on this, and unfortunately Sweeney has at times spent too much on bottom 6/bottom pairing guys. No need to re-hash the list. That said, I think Frederic is different at this stage of things. He's 24 and has some potential upside. He's improved as an overall player each year. Nothing earth-shattering, but steady. Two years at this rate is good investment in my view, because they can bury nearly half should it come to that, and are off the hook relatively quickly if he doesn't show any more growth. If he does become a solid, established 3rd line/second line tweener like Coyle (I think he stands a chance), they can pay him accordingly in term and dollars. If not, it's not an issue to cut bait at the end of two years.I generally dislike the idea of overpaying for bottom of the roster types. That's how you get yourself into cap jail. Which we saw when they had to dump Hall for cap relief because Sweeney overpaid Forbort, Reilly, etc the year before. Seeing useful players like Bertuzzi leave and take a short term low dollar deal elsewhere was another example of why you don't pay those end of the roster players more than they're worth.
His GA/60 was 5th best on the team behind Bergeron, Marchand, Nosek and Foligno. Natural Stat Trick .comI get the idea of discrediting stats that don't fit an argument.
I do think his defensive game is ++. It's in his DNA and development going all the way back to his role in the NTDP teams. In Boston I've seen him hesitating on jumping some offensive chances because of it IMO.
I've been looking for an even strength goal against/60 stat to measure him by and can't find one out there. Let me know if that exists somewhere
It’s like no matter what moves they made they should be considered master tacticians because they managed to get under the cap.Yup. Signing Patrick Brown, trading away Taylor Hall for Ian Mitchell, and re-signing his own RFA at a price more than 58% of fans in this poll predicted totally equals crushing it!
2022-23 Regular Season Champs
2023- Offseason Champs
Name | Age | Position | Games | Goals | Assists | Points | TOI | Cap Hit | |
Mark Stone |
| RW | 43 | 17 | 21 | 38 | 19:22 | $9,500,000 | |
Valeri Nichushkin | 28 | RW, LW | 53 | 17 | 30 | 47 | 20:16 | $6,125,000 | |
Nick Bjugstad | 30 | C, RW | 78 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 16:12 | $2,100,000 | |
Jordan Staal | 34 | C, LW | 81 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 16:16 | $2,900,000 | |
Nicholas Paul | 28 | C, LW | 80 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 16:09 | $3,150,000 | |
J.T. Compher | 28 | C, RW | 82 | 17 | 35 | 52 | 20:32 | $5,100,000 | |
Trent Frederic | 25 | LW, RW | 79 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 11:55 | $2,300,000 | |
Conor Garland | 27 | RW, LW | 81 | 17 | 29 | 46 | 15:06 | $4,950,000 | |
Andrew Mangiapane | 27 | RW, LW | 82 | 17 | 26 | 43 | 16:49 | $5,800,000 | |
Pierre Engvall | 27 | RW, LW | 76 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 13:37 | $3,000,000 | |
Eetu Luostarinen | 24 | LW, C | 82 | 17 | 26 | 43 | 15:59 | $1,500,000 | |
Lucas Raymond | 21 | RW, LW | 74 | 17 | 28 | 45 | 17:22 | $925,000 | |
Mason McTavish | 20 | C, LW | 80 | 17 | 26 | 43 | 15:22 | $894,167 | |
Kyle Palmieri | 32 | RW, LW | 55 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 17:05 | $5,000,000 | |
Blake Wheeler | 36 | RW, C | 72 | 16 | 39 | 55 | 17:02 | $800,000 | |
Taylor Hall | 31 | LW | 61 | 16 | 20 | 36 | 15:55 | $6,000,000 | |
Sam Bennett | 27 | C | 63 | 16 | 24 | 40 | 17:24 | $4,425,000 | |
Ryan O'Reilly | 32 | C | 53 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 17:56 | $4,500,000 | |
Chandler Stephenson | 29 | C, LW | 81 | 16 | 49 | 65 | 19:01 | $2,750,000 | |
William Carrier | 28 | LW | 56 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 12:35 | $1,400,000 | |
Evander Kane | 31 | LW, RW | 41 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 18:42 | $5,125,000 | |
Charlie Coyle | 31 | C, RW | 82 | 16 | 29 | 45 | 16:59 | $5,250,000 | |
Ivan Barbashev | 27 | LW, C | 82 | 16 | 29 | 45 | 16:45 | $5,000,000 | |
Evan Rodrigues | 29 | C, LW | 69 | 16 | 23 | 39 | 17:51 | $3,000,000 | |
Michael Amadio | 27 | W, C, | 67 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 12:12 | $762,500 | |
Brandon Tanev | 31 | LW, RW | 82 | 16 | 19 | 35 | 14:13 | $3,500,000 | |
Ross Colton | 26 | LW, C | 81 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 12:21 | $4,000,000 |
Definitely his biggest room for improvement next season - if they make it to the playoffs he needs to do something more than he has thus far.
In a one off scenario, no. In a scenario where they consistently overpay the bottom of the roster types, yes. As we've already seen this past off season. It's exactly why good players left and were moved for poor returns and replaced with lesser players.Do you honestly think that 2.3 mil for 2 years is going to cause cap issues for them? even if you replace him at league min, 1.5 mil isnt enough to retain a guy like Bert or Hall.
Agreed.In a one off scenario, no. In a scenario where they consistently overpay the bottom of the roster types, yes. As we've already seen this past off season. It's exactly why good players left and were moved for poor returns and replaced with lesser players.
Since you are so fed up with people misinterpreting what those JFresh player cards are saying, can you in your own words explain what information that Trent Frederic player card is trying to convey?Nah, you think this is personal and it's not. I discredit advanced stats for any player because I think most folks use them incorrectly, simply to justify a position they've taken, and disregard the context. Nothing specific to Freddy and everything to do with the poster.
Fair enough...I think (hope) Frederic is different than a Reilly or Forbort signing since he still has some upside, while those two were already developed into what they were at that point and a league min vet probably brings what they could have.In a one off scenario, no. In a scenario where they consistently overpay the bottom of the roster types, yes. As we've already seen this past off season. It's exactly why good players left and were moved for poor returns and replaced with lesser players.
You and me both.Agreed.
And if Frederic reverts back to his numbers pre-last season, this contract will be one that is frequently referenced as a roadblock.
I hope he is able to continue his progress and replicate his success from last season somewhat. It's going to be difficult, but he's grown a lot as player. Can he thrive as the best player on his line?
I'm a 'Freddy guy' for the most part but that it is the one stat that still frightens me, hopefully it was just a coincidence I guesss.PO production by far his biggest failing. Benched 3 straight years and has
0 goals in 16 AHL\NHL PO games.
This would only be useful if you had it normalized to people's salaries that had only one 17ish goal season. Including players like Stone or O'Reilly for example skews it because those guys consistently have scored over 20 goals for most of their careers so by default they naturally have larger salaries than a one time 17 goal scorer.Below is every forward who scored 17 or 16 goals last year and their cap hits for this year. I removed defensemen. Freddy looks like a pretty good value to me. Frederic also had the lowest time on ice.
Also according to advanced stats Frederic is a stellar defensive forward.
Name Age Position Games Goals Assists Points TOI Cap Hit Mark Stone
31 RW 43 17 21 38 19:22 $9,500,000 Valeri Nichushkin 28 RW, LW 53 17 30 47 20:16 $6,125,000 Nick Bjugstad 30 C, RW 78 17 12 29 16:12 $2,100,000 Jordan Staal 34 C, LW 81 17 17 34 16:16 $2,900,000 Nicholas Paul 28 C, LW 80 17 15 32 16:09 $3,150,000 J.T. Compher 28 C, RW 82 17 35 52 20:32 $5,100,000 Trent Frederic 25 LW, RW 79 17 14 31 11:55 $2,300,000 Conor Garland 27 RW, LW 81 17 29 46 15:06 $4,950,000 Andrew Mangiapane 27 RW, LW 82 17 26 43 16:49 $5,800,000 Pierre Engvall 27 RW, LW 76 17 13 30 13:37 $3,000,000 Eetu Luostarinen 24 LW, C 82 17 26 43 15:59 $1,500,000 Lucas Raymond 21 RW, LW 74 17 28 45 17:22 $925,000 Mason McTavish 20 C, LW 80 17 26 43 15:22 $894,167 Kyle Palmieri 32 RW, LW 55 16 17 33 17:05 $5,000,000 Blake Wheeler 36 RW, C 72 16 39 55 17:02 $800,000 Taylor Hall 31 LW 61 16 20 36 15:55 $6,000,000 Sam Bennett 27 C 63 16 24 40 17:24 $4,425,000 Ryan O'Reilly 32 C 53 16 14 30 17:56 $4,500,000 Chandler Stephenson 29 C, LW 81 16 49 65 19:01 $2,750,000 William Carrier 28 LW 56 16 9 25 12:35 $1,400,000 Evander Kane 31 LW, RW 41 16 12 28 18:42 $5,125,000 Charlie Coyle 31 C, RW 82 16 29 45 16:59 $5,250,000 Ivan Barbashev 27 LW, C 82 16 29 45 16:45 $5,000,000 Evan Rodrigues 29 C, LW 69 16 23 39 17:51 $3,000,000 Michael Amadio 27 W, C, 67 16 11 27 12:12 $762,500 Brandon Tanev 31 LW, RW 82 16 19 35 14:13 $3,500,000 Ross Colton 26 LW, C 81 16 16 32 12:21 $4,000,000
Did you find yourself watching Freddy's game last year and remarking how tremendous he was defensively? Honest question. Would love to hear your answer. It's a yes or a no though. Nuance and grasping at straws to justify it are nothing but extraneous attempts to make the card fit the narrative. So yes or no, were you thinking to yourself during games "what a defensive stalwart this dude is"? Was he one of the guys that had to be on the ice at the end of the game? Was his defensive game so good that he was an anchor on the PK?Since you are so fed up with people misinterpreting what those JFresh player cards are saying, can you in your own words explain what information that Trent Frederic player card is trying to convey?
And that's a fair take. I personally would have thought the reverse should have happened but it is what it is.Swayman got a few hundred thousand less than I expected and Freddy got a few more.
Evens out.
I will let Trent respond to that himself.When has he really ever taken on a heavyweight though? He typically picks non-fighters and middleweights to go with. Pretty much a spot picker.
I will let Trent respond to that himself.