FoxysExpensiveNYDigs
Boo Nieves Truther
Who they are about to extend. Its fun to dream i guess.Literally every offseason hypothetical here involves the acquisition of Gavrikov.
Who they are about to extend. Its fun to dream i guess.Literally every offseason hypothetical here involves the acquisition of Gavrikov.
Lets break this down.
For the sake of the argument I will read your 2+ statement as 3 seasons.
22/23 - 39 goals, 91 points
23/24 - 26 goals, 72 points
24/25 - 20 goals, 62 points (since jan 1st, 41 points in 46 games)
Nobody in their right mind would call his 22/23 season trash. I will give you 23/24 even though I see it more as a down season. That leaves us with the 1st half of 24/25 where he truly was trash and a second half where he was productive.
A more fair assessment would be to say he have had 2 dissapointing seasons including an awful 1st half this season.
wow, this is really badThe two moves id be trying to make this offseason would be
1) Kandre and othmann for sam girard and jack drury
2) kreider for zadorov, boston may be in a very quick re-tool that could take 1-2 years and probably prefer the 2 years left on kreider rather than the 5 left on zadorov
Blue line re-made over night
girard-fox
Zadorov-borgen
Jones/vaak-schneider
Perhaps you should follow that intuition and not post your shitty take about him having a loving family.I know I’ll catch some heat for this take, and that’s fine. But here it is: Zibanejad’s wife and daughter attend every home game, and honestly, it’s kind of annoying
A good Zone Scheme mitigates that, even if you have to say "A couple of guys are allowed to play jazz, but you're not," to most of the roster.
He showed it last season, including stepping up further in the playoffs, AND the first quarter of this season. It’s chicken or the egg impossible to prove either way but I see the total collapse of this team affecting him more than I think his decline in play caused all of the veteran players to tank… He’s 23. I agree it doesn’t matter how many years he’s been in the NHL, players aren’t finished products at 23. They aren’t even done physically or mentally developing.I judge the cusp of having a fully formed frontal cortex at 24/25 as more of "he is what he is."
I'm not saying "It's been five seasons" is disingenuous. Just that most players "flash" something at 22/23, and then "pop" a year or two later. Regardless of what age they started in the NHL. Laf really showed something last season and then turned back into a lump of clay.
This should be the most important off-season of his career, and my fear is that getting a pay day already will leave him less motivated. He "can" top 30G & 30A. We just paid him to do that consistently for a bunch of years even though he only "almost" did both once.
So I'm not even saying you're wrong. There's a real chance that for the next two seasons, he pulls the same "Almost 25G, almost 25A, not quite 50P" schtick.
I'm more comfortable saying a 25yo "is what he is" regardless of how many NHL seasons of service (or even draft position). Those guys that pop off at 27 for the first time always feel weird anyway.
Although, if you have the heart of Brodzinski, you can become more than your 25yo self at like 30! Just don't overpay those guys.
don't disagree with your diagnosis of mediocre offense here - especially as manifested in lack of puck carrying and lack of footspeedI have friends who are more casual followers or just not fans of the Rangers that are still in awe that this vaunted roster isn't good.
There are a lot of reasons for this phenomenon but a big one that I would like to address as we build is that our more middling forwards -the guys that aren't star scorers- aren't good all-around forwards and do nothing but score 45 points.
Lafreniere is good at finishing and finding an incisive pass. He sucks at everything else. He doesn't carry the puck well. He doesn't forecheck or cycle well. He's one of the worst defensive players in the NHL. Suggesting we put him on PP1 to get more scoring, assuming that holds, doesn't really solve the problem.
Cuylle is a terrible at defense and while he hits a lot, his impact on forechecking and cycling is limited for a player with that many hits. Granted, he doesn't play with anybody who's good at that. He's also not a pick carrier but again, who is? Panarin, that's it. We traded our only other decent one to Vancouver (and yes, I know he's made out of glass). I like Cuylle and I think he has the most potential with the right pieces around him but his limitations are things we're already bad at as a team.
BTW I'm counting Panarin and JT Miller as top tier scorers. That's probably generous to Miller but he scored a lot after the trade and I don't feel like rehashing it. Let's just say he's one of our scorers.
Nobody else justified their existence by scoring alone. Whatever Mika and Kreider did besides scoring kind of disappeared this year, especially Kreider who definitely used to be a good all-around player. Trocheck has the vibes of being a hustle guy but tbh he was always more offense-first than he gets pegged for.
For, again, a variety of reasons, they have some sexier than average names, which leads to certain expectations, but it's just not a very well put together group of forwards when you look at how their individual abilities fit together.
We have 12 forwards and 10 of them suck at carrying the puck (Panarin, and again, I'll give you Miller). ZERO of them have back-off speed. ZERO of them are great defensively. Only one of them tries to shoot for the volume and he's not even in the regular 12.
You could also say zero of them tend to live in the slot, but you know, teams try to take away the slot. It might be open more if we did anything well.
You think we’d be getting the poor end of those deals?wow, this is really bad
drury, is that you?
a complete anchor in zadorov for five years and a tiny little guy i could fit in my pocket playing next to an already small guy on the top pair? that defense looks like the worst defense in the league lmaoYou think we’d be getting the poor end of those deals?
it doesnt sound dumb it is dumbso woodcraft is the front runner?
I know it sounds dumb but I want someone in shape. That’s my metric just like drafting players with “strong” names lol
I like muse. PK was strong and he has a history with developing. I’d honestly give him a chance. I just want a fresh look.
Should have gotten Montgomery.
Zadorov-foxa complete anchor in zadorov for five years and a tiny little guy i could fit in my pocket playing next to an already small guy on the top pair? that defense looks like the worst defense in the league lmao
Roobroeck had a heckuva first year in the AHL. Would be nice if we can have a long term inexpensive 4th line of
Edstrom-roobroeck-rempe
Bunch of heavy dudes who arent bad hockey players. Makes filling the rest of the lineup easier
with zadorov on the top pair we may as well have kept lindgrenZadorov-fox
Girard-borgen
Alot better than what we have now
I get what you’re saying but country club meme comes from the org treating players like Saudi royalty. It’s as first class as it gets. The paid players lose their edge. You need to play with an edge.My problem with the whole country club thing is that sometimes I feel we've convinced ourselves we have the only good team in the league that just doesn't try.
I don't hear it said about anybody else. Like, it's kind of a Rangers meme, tbh.
And I'm not saying this to discount effort, but if you're capable of playing right, you play right.
Granted, there's some ebb and flow. Players learn and adjust. There's some distance between your C game and your A game.
But how long has it been? How many coaches has it been? And even if we do tap into something, Florida took the best version of this group and still bent it up like a pretzel.
@chosen has been beating the drum for years, and he's right. It's personnel at the end of the day.
He plays pretty damn well when the games mean most.with zadorov on the top pair we may as well have kept lindgren
he sucks
we aint gonna be playing games that mean shit if he’s averaging 22 minutesHe plays pretty damn well when the games mean most.
This is my biggest gripe, from AV and through Lavy we never had a coach who adjusts. They all think their game plan is the best and refuses to make changes based on the players on the roster or the opponent. The players obv could not handle the man to man system in the d zone. Opposing players always found holes to get free. When Fl was crushing nyr in the playoffs, and if it wasn’t for Igor and a couple of lucky bounces they would’ve been out in 4, hell they wouldn’t have made it passed Carolina. This is why you need a coach who can actually formulate a plan and not be so stubborn to think their system works no matter what.
This opinion will go over like a lead balloon but I would hire back Steve Smith.Tom Renney was a good coach. He was just never going to be a Cup winning coach.
Torts and AV were good coaches. Warts and all. Either "could've" done it.
Quinn was an outside the box hire, but was worse than a wish dot com Renney. Happens.
GG was a decent choice. Unironically similar to Ruff and sorta letting the team play pond hockey. Short shelf life.
Lavi would've gone down in history as a good choice for us if he soured in year 3 instead of year 2.
Knoblach is looking like a "better Renney" which stings.
I have no idea who I'd want as the next coach. I just don't want this defensive scheme. I'd give an "outside the box" hire a chance, but there unfortunately wouldn't be much leash.