News and Blog Report: Training camp & Preseason News & Notes

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
16,429
18,083
Vancouver
I mean they signed him to a 3 year deal and he brings something to the table that we sorely lack especially with Kane out of the lineup. I doubt that he's much of a downgrade from Vinny.
Oil have pre-purchased their trade deadline depth d-men with Brown and Stetcher. Giving them x3 and x2 terms protects against waiver claim action and their differing styles gives 3rd pair and 7th D versatility. Emberson's age, possible latent ability, and ufa status likely gets him first shot at 2RD until trade deadline upgrade.

All trade chips at deadline can focus on 2RD upgrade and retention/double retention potential with maybe a cheap get at another position.
 

Broberg Speed

Registered User
Oct 23, 2020
7,998
5,377
He's no worse than Desharnais.
I believe those are realistic expectations... that's the bar. I wonder what Desharnais stat line would have looked like last season in Arizona as a stay at home defensive defenseman? Brown is s a good interview.


This is from yesterday, I love how Bouchard credits Barrie on helping him develop his power play game.


I hope Pickard gets 30 regular season game so Skinner is fresh for the postseason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryanbryoil

onetweasy

"That's just like, your opinion, man"
Oct 16, 2005
2,362
2,700
Bowling Alley
Let's keep the discussion here to training camp. Anything that doesn't fit into other threads can go in the OT thread.

Well f***.

I came into this training camp thread looking exclusively for ways to solve countless complex City planning issues and now you’ve gone and ended that…..
 

On The Prowl

Registered User
Mar 13, 2024
163
320
Hes probably just the #7. Probably will come in for certain matchups. We will see. I know nothing about him. I wasn’t too enthusiastic to watch Coyotes games personally.
Pretty sure I saw him destroy somebody in a fight the one and only time I remember watching him.
 

Dazed and Confused

Ludicrous speed, GO!
Aug 10, 2007
6,331
2,868
Berlin, Germany
He hasn’t really played on a good team yet. Let’s just see what he can do, I’m not writing anyone off yet

I think this is the only point where I'm not going to completely write him off. He didn't get into many games with them, but Boston fans seemed to like what he brought back in 2022 after getting traded there at the TDL.

Still, I have him on the outside looking in. But considering history says Stecher and Dermott are made of glass, and Emberson struggled to stay healthy last year (though he was fine in college and the AHL), I wouldn't be surprised to see Brown or Kemp pushed into service.
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
50,412
42,152
Only by analytics that ignore all context.
The analytics that compare him to his teammates show the same too. He got easy minutes and still did bad. Mostly saw bottom comp and did bad.
We are taking a#6/7 d from the worst defence in the league and throwing them on our third pairing. He’s not good. He and Dermott are similar level players. Dudes 30 he isn’t some young dude with potential.

I think this is the only point where I'm not going to completely write him off. He didn't get into many games with them, but Boston fans seemed to like what he brought back in 2022 after getting traded there at the TDL.

Still, I have him on the outside looking in. But considering history says Stecher and Dermott are made of glass, and Emberson struggled to stay healthy last year (though he was fine in college and the AHL), I wouldn't be surprised to see Brown or Kemp pushed into service.
If we are playing games with both Brown and Kemp in the lineup, Ekholm and Bouchard are going to be over worked lol
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
50,412
42,152
Only by analytics that ignore all context.
Relative Corsi -8, worst on the team
Relative Fenwick -7.1, second worse, Dermott worse
xGF Relarive -6, second worst on team, Dermott worse

This is a player while seeing the easiest minutes against the easiest comps did worse than Arizonas out of their element top4 d against much better competition.

He is a bad player, full stop.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,357
32,089
Ontario
Relative Corsi -8, worst on the team
Relative Fenwick -7.1, second worse, Dermott worse
xGF Relarive -6, second worst on team, Dermott worse

This is a player while seeing the easiest minutes against the easiest comps did worse than Arizonas out of their element top4 d against much better competition.

He is a bad player, full stop.
These are the exact analytics I'm talking about that lack any context.

Player A plays with Durzi while getting a big offensive zone push then plays with Brown with a big defensive zone push. Player A is obviously going to have better numbers with Durzi in the offensive zone, but relative stats tell you that none of that matters and it's all Brown's fault.

Relative stats are completely useless when comparing players with different usages and it's the reason why every one number model by Twitter analytics "experts" that's based entirely on those numbers are laughed at by actual analytics people.
 

Dazed and Confused

Ludicrous speed, GO!
Aug 10, 2007
6,331
2,868
Berlin, Germany
The analytics that compare him to his teammates show the same too. He got easy minutes and still did bad. Mostly saw bottom comp and did bad.
We are taking a#6/7 d from the worst defence in the league and throwing them on our third pairing. He’s not good. He and Dermott are similar level players. Dudes 30 he isn’t some young dude with potential.


If we are playing games with both Brown and Kemp in the lineup, Ekholm and Bouchard are going to be over worked lol

Both in the lineup? Yeah, the team's probably in a bad spot. But any team that has three+ injuries on defence (As that would need all of Stecher, Emberson, and Dermott unavailable) is going to struggle.

But one of them next to Kulak? That's more or less identical to Kulak-Vinny.

Kulak's been the guy that has successfully stirred the drink on the 3rd pairing for the last few seasons, regardless if they're running a declining Barrie, a rookie Vinny, or Broberg on his offside next to him. So long as he's there, I'm not concerned.


Plus I think Brown is just going to be a situational play vs. physical teams, and that's a role he's fine in. If the team wants to add some consistent size to the backend to replace Vinny/Ceci, I think it'll be Kemp that gets the longest look. (who is also my dark horse for camp).
 
Last edited:

alphahelix

Registered User
Feb 15, 2007
7,229
3,060
These are the exact analytics I'm talking about that lack any context.

Player A plays with Durzi while getting a big offensive zone push then plays with Brown with a big defensive zone push. Player A is obviously going to have better numbers with Durzi in the offensive zone, but relative stats tell you that none of that matters and it's all Brown's fault.

Relative stats are completely useless when comparing players with different usages and it's the reason why every one number model by Twitter analytics "experts" that's based entirely on those numbers are laughed at by actual analytics people.

Desharnais got exclusively tough defensive minutes and PK minutes, until he was injured in the playoffs. Before we had Desharnais on the big team, we were literally losing constantly and had no effective PK, and were about to slip out of playoff contention. Woodcroft brought him up and it stabilized our entire team defence.

He gets injured in the playoffs and loses his slot for a few games and suddenly hes chopped liver. You can’t buy what Desharnais brings Defensively with a RHD. It doesn’t exist on the market, and Josh Brown, for less than half the money, is way less than half the player. He cannot be trusted against elites - Desharnais often was in a pinch. Good luck out there with your fantasy roster mister.

P.S. this isn’t to say im rooting against Josh Brown or anything, I’m deeply invested in him playing the best hockey of his career because our season kind of depends on it at this point. When it comes to right-side defenders to put out against elites.. we have nothing much. Elite teams will take advantage of every hole. If Josh Brown can take a step forward somehow at his advanced age, it would be a miracle for us. Let’s go Josh Brown. (But as another poster pointed out he was analytically the worst d-man in the NHL so it seems kinda stupid to assume he can help- this signing is likely more like the Corey Perry signing. A warm body being paid more than league min. that ultimately costs ‘Dylan Holloway types’ Their slots- we needed to pinch every penny)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneSweep

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
50,412
42,152
I forget. Who did he play for?
He was a bottom pairing limited use defender on a bad team and looked bad.
These are the exact analytics I'm talking about that lack any context.

Player A plays with Durzi while getting a big offensive zone push then plays with Brown with a big defensive zone push. Player A is obviously going to have better numbers with Durzi in the offensive zone, but relative stats tell you that none of that matters and it's all Brown's fault.

Relative stats are completely useless when comparing players with different usages and it's the reason why every one number model by Twitter analytics "experts" that's based entirely on those numbers are laughed at by actual analytics people.
Brown is a limited use bottom pairing defender who played against bottom competition and did bad at it.
Relative stats basically show who is doing their role well and who is not. Brown was doing bad at playing as a bottom pairing defender. That’s what it shows. He was a worse bottom pairing defender than a guy like Kesselring or Stetcher was a second pair guy. You can say I’m ignoring context but where is l it really any context that shows he isn’t a bad player outside of your feelings? I haven’t seen a single person who has actually watched him play in any real sample size not say he sucks.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,357
32,089
Ontario
Desharnais got exclusively tough defensive minutes and PK minutes, until he was injured in the playoffs. Before we had Desharnais on the big team, we were literally losing constantly and had no effective PK, and were about to slip out of playoff contention. Woodcroft brought him up and it stabilized our entire team defence.

He gets injured in the playoffs and loses his slot for a few games and suddenly hes chopped liver. You can’t buy what Desharnais brings Defensively with a RHD. It doesn’t exist on the market, and Josh Brown, for less than half the money, is way less than half the player. He cannot be trusted against elites - Desharnais often was in a pinch. Good luck out there with your fantasy roster mister.

P.S. this isn’t to say im rooting against Josh Brown or anything, I’m deeply invested in him playing the best hockey of his career because our season kind of depends on it at this point. When it comes to right-side defenders to put out against elites.. we have nothing much. Elite teams will take advantage of every hole. If Josh Brown can take a step forward somehow at his advanced age, it would be a miracle for us. Let’s go Josh Brown. (But as another poster pointed out he was analytically the worst d-man in the NHL so it seems kinda stupid to assume he can help- this signing is likely more like the Corey Perry signing. A warm body being paid more than league min. that ultimately costs ‘Dylan Holloway types’ Their slots- we needed to pinch every penny)
Desharnais played 4% more of his ice time vs elites than Brown did last year according to PuckIQ numbers.

Vinny is a likeable guy, but he really isn't something that's hard to replace. Most successful teams have a revolving door of #6D type guys because they're dime a dozen players.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,357
32,089
Ontario
He was a bottom pairing limited use defender on a bad team and looked bad.

Brown is a limited use bottom pairing defender who played against bottom competition and did bad at it.
Relative stats basically show who is doing their role well and who is not. Brown was doing bad at playing as a bottom pairing defender. That’s what it shows. He was a worse bottom pairing defender than a guy like Kesselring or Stetcher was a second pair guy. You can say I’m ignoring context but where is l it really any context that shows he isn’t a bad player outside of your feelings? I haven’t seen a single person who has actually watched him play in any real sample size not say he sucks.
That's not what relative stats do at all.

A player in a defensive role is almost always going to have worse team metrics than guys playing in offensive situations with more talented players. One number that ignores all context of usage isn't going to tell you which player is doing a better job at their role.
 

LTIR

Registered User
Nov 8, 2013
27,330
14,580
Relative Corsi -8, worst on the team
Relative Fenwick -7.1, second worse, Dermott worse
xGF Relarive -6, second worst on team, Dermott worse

This is a player while seeing the easiest minutes against the easiest comps did worse than Arizonas out of their element top4 d against much better competition.

He is a bad player, full stop.
Bad player by your standards*

Anyone who makes it to the NHL gets there for a reason. Oilers think of him as an upgrade over Desharnais and targeted him early in free agency locking him up for 3 yrs. He may not be more than a #7 at NHL level but he is far from a 'bad player' by my standards
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad