ULF_55
Moderator
Close, but he was 2nd. pairing in Vancouver last year, a minute more than Bear.OEL is actually in a 3rd pair...much easier than playing on top pair against toughest matchup like he did in Vancouver
Close, but he was 2nd. pairing in Vancouver last year, a minute more than Bear.OEL is actually in a 3rd pair...much easier than playing on top pair against toughest matchup like he did in Vancouver
People have had that conversations. There was a large group that wanted to trade him last year.Matthews is right there with him but nobody's ready for that conversation
Matthews is right there with him but nobody's ready for that conversation
""
As a #8 guy... sure... at league minimum... but not in any other role.
You move Marner, in hopes that whatever Shanahan and Tre are seeing as deficiencies in his game, can be fixed by bringing in new bodies to fix the team.
You move Matthews, and you are rebuilding. There is no fixing the team, and you are starting from scratch... you are just hoping that with some changes, he figures it out.
That's the difference in the conversation..
the issue as I see it has been that our Defense offers no threat to the defending team, and they can ignore them almost completely, and focus down low and in front of the net on our forwards, and contain them that much easier as a result.1C is basically a prerequisite to do anything in this league.
You want a cup? You need an amazing top 4 or a bonafide stud #1 D
We haven't figured out the defense and the depth up front has been so-so.
the issue as I see it has been that our Defense offers no threat to the defending team, and they can ignore them almost completely, and focus down low and in front of the net on our forwards, and contain them that much easier as a result.
With no real threat from the defense, other teams have no reason to worry about stopping them, as all they do is pass to the side boards.
he has (had) a decent wrister, and used it well for 1 season, and 1 season only... I've never understood why he stopped shooting the puck. We really need a PP slap shot threat though, heck, I'm desperate enough to let Robertson try the point, as he may have the best slapper on the team (and that is pretty sad when a 5'9" guy has the hardest slap shot on the team)That's definitely on Tree to fix, Florida doesn't have the true stud # but their top 4 is strong, especially the top 3 of Ekblad, Forsling and Montour. Montour offers the most offense of the 3 but the other 2 aren't useless there either.
Rielly's got a muffin of a shot and after that our group back on defense doesn't offer much.
GO BIG or GO HOME
Leaf need Cliff Fletcher back who brought us Dougie Gilmour and Mats Sundin in blockbuster trades.
My trade proposal ... Leafs and NYI's ..
TO NYI:
Mitch Marner ($10,903,000) + Morgan Rielly ($7,500,000) + Joseph Woll ($766,667) + Timothy Liljegren (RFA past $1,400,000) = $20.56 mil total AAV
TO TORONTO:
Matty Barzal ($9,150,000) + Noah Dobson ($4,000,000) + Ilya Sorokin ($8,250,000) + Scott Mayfield ($3,500,000) = $24.9 mil total AAV
Conclusion:
Leafs address all their needs in 1 shot ... Barzal becomes Leafs #2C replacing an aging JT .. Sorokin gives Leafs their proven #1G and Dobson and Mayfield are both RHD filling out the right side.
NYI gain a little Cap space to re-sign Marner long-term and Woll and Liljegren are young and were both drafted by Lou Lam when he was Leafs GM.
Who is with me on this?
So your now saying nylander is 2.5 million overpaid because he isn’t better than anyone you compared marner toHere is the current list of NHL forwards making between $9 mil and less then $10 mil AAV.
Players like Kucherov, Aho, Tkachuk, Rantanen, Point, Stone, Barzal & Kaprizov etc. This is the group Marner should be grouped in with contract wise.
View attachment 885191
Marner's next contract should be 8 years @ $9.5 mil AAV which = a pay-cut of nearly $1.5 mil per year to bring him in-line with his comparable group of forwards.
he has (had) a decent wrister, and used it well for 1 season, and 1 season only... I've never understood why he stopped shooting the puck. We really need a PP slap shot threat though, heck, I'm desperate enough to let Robertson try the point, as he may have the best slapper on the team (and that is pretty sad when a 5'9" guy has the hardest slap shot on the team)
The original post was about playing kids, there being more kids to play now, and the worse ways we've surrounded them.
You haven't really responded to anything. You've largely just dumped on our kids, pretended that having more internal depth is bad, and praised Treliving for his failures.
Yes, I am certainly glad that we didn't screw up pretty obvious 1st and 8th overall picks. And glad Dubas re-signed them.
Not true, and already more than Treliving had.
NYI IMO loses this and won't do it unless Leafs sweeten the pot with a few picks
just based on the players listed
Barzal (center) > Marner (winger) -> given cap hit and position
Doboson >Rielly (IMO)
Mayfield > Liljegren (at least based on NHL experience)
Sorokin > Woll (based on NHL experience)
That's definitely on Tree to fix, Florida doesn't have the true stud # but their top 4 is strong, especially the top 3 of Ekblad, Forsling and Montour. Montour offers the most offense of the 3 but the other 2 aren't useless there either.
Rielly's got a muffin of a shot and after that our group back on defense doesn't offer much.
Actually, what I said in a small portion of my post is that he was "much better at replenishing the pool" than Lou, which is true. And then you pretended that all of our young players and prospects were bad. And then you brought up Domi and Bertuzzi, so I corrected your statements about them and countered your praise of Treliving's failures.It started with your false claim that Dubas provided us with a great pool of young depth. That somehow turned into you pretending Bertuzzi and Domi were bad signings.
Covering your eyes doesn't make something stop existing.I'm not questioning our internal depth. I'm denying it's existence.
Unless Hudson Malinoski has a time machine, that will be pretty hard.Treliving's 1st pick likely beats all of your imaginary Dubas depth onto this roster.
He hasn’t even played 200 games yet. Let the kid play. Some defencemen take longer to develop.how many chances do you give a guy? Time to move on, and IF he turns into the next Stralman, well he couldn't do it here..................
He hasn’t even played 200 games yet. Let the kid play. Some defencemen take longer to develop.
What was their cap percentage when they all signed?Here is the current list of NHL forwards making between $9 mil and less then $10 mil AAV.
Players like Kucherov, Aho, Tkachuk, Rantanen, Point, Stone, Barzal & Kaprizov etc. This is the group Marner should be grouped in with contract wise.
View attachment 885191
Marner's next contract should be 8 years @ $9.5 mil AAV which = a pay-cut of nearly $1.5 mil per year to bring him in-line with his comparable group of forwards.
10.9m in cap space is not nearly the prize that some pretend it is, especially when it would most likely get wasted or bring back lesser overall impact, and not go towards those other superstars. The only real way that Marner loses is a career-ending injury. There are many, many ways that Toronto loses in this. The risk for Marner is much smaller.
There is a cost to waiting for a defenceman to break out who has been stagnant for years - paying for an RD every tdl to jam into the lineup down the final stretch so Lily can sit in the press box come playoff time.He hasn’t even played 200 games yet. Let the kid play. Some defencemen take longer to develop.
As much as I like him to be a Leafs, he is a bit pricey.Colorado’s Ross Colton joins Trade Targets as NHL trade market heats up
After two big trades earlier this week, more dominoes may soon fall.www.dailyfaceoff.com
8. Ross Colton
Center, Colorado Avalanche
Age: 27
Stats: 80 GP, 17 G, 23 A, 40 Pts
Contract: 3 years remaining, $4 million AAV
Scoop: It was less than one calendar year ago, June 28, that the Avs acquired Colton as a cap casualty from the Tampa Bay Lightning. Now, one year later, Colton could be the same for the Avalanche. Colton is coming off a career-best 40-point season, too. It’s just that Colorado has so many hurdles to clear on the cap this summer that Colton may be the odd man out. They have to clear space for Gabriel Landeskog to be activated at some point next season. They aren’t sure about the status of Valeri Nichushkin, who is in Stage 3 of the Player Assistance program after a drug-related issue during the playoffs for the second year in a row. And they’ve also prioritized the re-signing of Jonathan Drouin. The arrival of Casey Mittelstadt at center, who also needs a new deal, makes it easier to move Colton, who should have plenty of trade equity – but the Avs will have to act fast because Colton’s full ‘no-trade’ clause kicks in on July 1. He has no trade protection until then.
But if both the player and the team is doing well. It is hard to complain.It's like this every year after Marner lays an egg. People forget the emotional gut punch of his little playoff meltdowns and no shows and things return to normal and we start hyping up the boyband again. It's time to take the poster off bedroom walls, donate the jersey to Value Village. Move on.
As much as I like him to be a Leafs, he is a bit pricey.
It doesn't have to bring in a player to replace Marners production. It has to bring in players to help out our top 6 produce offence in the playoffs. McDavid played a Game 5 of the Cup finals with Hyman and Foegle for crying out loud. Could you imagine the crying on here if Matthews or Marner ever had to do that. Hell, people cried when Matthews and Marner had to play with Hyman. Matthews is gonna produce no matter what and he showed that playing with 2 guys who made less than Marner combined. Makes the team much harder to match up against and possibly gives Matthews and Nylander easier matchups at times for other teams to adjust, especially if you can get a good 2nd line C in return for Marner and move Tavares to the 3rd line.10.9m in cap space is not nearly the prize that some pretend it is, especially when it would most likely get wasted or bring back lesser overall impact, and not go towards those other superstars. The only real way that Marner loses is a career-ending injury. There are many, many ways that Toronto loses in this. The risk for Marner is much smaller.