Leaftors
Registered User
Ahh got itYeah Keefe said they want them available for the Marlies game tomorrow
Ahh got itYeah Keefe said they want them available for the Marlies game tomorrow
not sure if this was posted here yet but...
not sure if this was posted here yet but...
May not be but CJ has connected us, and people close to Ekholm say we might be a front runner. We'll see.I don’t think we’re in on Ekholm
Really eh. I’d love to get him, just didn’t think we had as good of pieces as they’d get elsewhereMay not be but CJ has connected us, and people close to Ekholm say we might be a front runner. We'll see.
We have the prospects and picks to get a deal done. A Granlund Ekholm package would be nice if it comes at a reasonable cost.Really eh. I’d love to get him, just didn’t think we had as good of pieces as they’d get elsewhere
What do you thinks reasonable?We have the prospects and picks to get a deal done. A Granlund Ekholm package would be nice if it comes at a reasonable cost.
not sure if this was posted here yet but...
Either everyone called immediately and they realized it was too little or they’re capitalizing on Ekholm being the trade deadline headline (I think it’s the latter)why would the price go up?
why would the price go up?
Jarnkrok makes a lot of sense, versatile player. C/W, PKs, good two way player, best in a 3rd line role but enough smarts and skill to play up in the lineup if needed. Also just 2 mill on the cap with one more year after this one.Its an interesting trade deadline. There are very few “sellers” at this point with those teams being the most engaged sound like they are the obvious:
Sens
Sharks
Ducks (Deslauriers, Rakell, Hakanpaa)
Sabres (Staal)
Devils
Red Wings (B. Ryan, Glend, Namest)
Nashville is in discussions purely due to the pieces they’ve got allegedly available, and their playoff hopes. My money is on Jankrok here, not mentioned but we will see.
Columbus is another, but I think you see Torts go before they make any significant changes.
Then there are very few “buyers” due to cap constraints and internal budgets.
Do I think the Leafs can make a move of significance?
I do, but they’ll likely need to continue to find a 3rd party to retain salary for some targets.
Lots of moving parts with several issues to overcome.
You are looking at a 1st, and and one of our top 4 prospects plus other pieces.What do you thinks reasonable?
why would the price go up?
not sure if this was posted here yet but...
We have the prospects and picks to get a deal done. A Granlund Ekholm package would be nice if it comes at a reasonable cost.
What do you thinks reasonable?
Cap works; brought Boyd back @50% because if Kerfoot is out we need bottom 6 centre depth (Granlund will play wing but very capable top 6 or bottom 6 centre depth), he's familiar to Leafs system, doesn't need to quarantine, cheap, & @50% of his cap hit he's easiest option to fit.If there's a deal to be made for both Ekholm and Granlund, you do it regardless of the cost. Anyone is available minus our core 4 and Rielly, Muzzin, Brodie for defenseman. Adding a top 6 winger plus a top 3 defenseman puts this team is serious cup contention.
Cap works; brought Boyd back @50% because if Kerfoot is out we need bottom 6 centre depth (Granlund will play wing but very capable top 6 or bottom 6 centre depth), he's familiar to Leafs system, doesn't need to quarantine, cheap, & @50% of his cap hit he's easiest option to fit.
Granlund Ekholm Boyd - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Nashville:
1st round pick 2021 (TOR)
LW Rodion Amirov
Alex Kerfoot
Filip Hallander
* Conditional 3rd round pick 2021 (TOR) * becomes 2nd if Leafs make Stanley Cup Finals.
Toronto:
LHD Ekholm (7% retained by NSH)
W/C Granlund (50% retained by NSH)
C/RW Travis Boyd (50% retained by TOR) * could have be as low as 46%
Vancouver:
LHD Filip Kral
Edit: Boyd is on COVID protocol list but still works. Team is at a 21-man roster here. If Dermott+ were instead move for say Nick Paul a 20-man roster opposed to a 21-man roster, where that Centre could be a higher cap hit.
Ekholm Granlund Paul - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
He was waived for cap reasons the Leafs could have gotten a late pick for him; they were obviously hoping to keep him. Maybe Boyd @50% is worth a 6th or 7th. Kral is a late 5th round pick (maybe his stock has risen a little since), fits a Vancouver prospect pool need, maybe they send us back a late round pick or just just send us a late round pick without Kral included. I doubt he ever plays a game for the Leafs and odds are Dubas can flip another late round pick for something good. That's the minor part of the 3-way trade it's just to get it done, Nashville will want to retain as little as possible on Ekholm which is the big picture of the deals & there are not many great centre options at 700k with retention. Don't care if Leafs overpay something so small to make it happen, it's insignificant compared to what else is going on; that can't be a roadblock.We are not giving up anything of value for Travis Boyd. He's a waiver fodder player for a reason, and worse than a lot of the depth guys we have right now.
Meanwhile Filip Kral is a legit prospect with serious upside.
I feel like the Marlies got robbed a little this season. Hallander, Kral, Der-Arguchintsev, and Malgin would all probably be playing for the Marlies right now, that would definitely give him a pretty big boost.We are not giving up anything of value for Travis Boyd. He's a waiver fodder player for a reason, and worse than a lot of the depth guys we have right now.
Meanwhile Filip Kral is a legit prospect with serious upside.