The deal has shades of Demar for Kawhi. Florida gets the better all around player who is a slightly worse scorer. The big difference is Weegar is Danny Green in this situation and he went the opposite direction.Flames did A+ job keeping their team competitive after two best players ditched them. But I still rather be the team getting 24 year old Tkachuk. Both teams win. I wouldn't even need to think about it if you gave me option to choose between tkachuk or huberdeau+weegar.
Again, go back and look.Bad defense, loaded forward group, good goalie.
2018-2019: Toronto Maple Leafs 2018-19 roster and scoring statistics at hockeydb.comAgain, go back and look.
FYI the only forwards among the group he wasn't involved in were Matthews and Nylander.
Sorry. Mostly a dig at some Leafs fans who seem to always hugely overvalue or hugely undervalue their own players.If true, it seems to be having the opposite effect.
The missed opportunity to get Weegar is a huge pet peeve, particularly when considering how little we ended up getting for Dermott and Johnsson.Its ok.. i barely know how to use it
Not like i am a huge fan of weegar but man.. i never understood the fascination with dermott. Its like people got mesmermized be of how much he made his arms move
What is he now around 3 or 3.5 yeah that would have been workable to keep. It would have probably stimulated trading muzzin or brodie this season to recapture any value they have left with 2 yrs remaining and prepare to have money to re sign weegarThe missed opportunity to get Weegar is a huge pet peeve, particularly when considering how little we ended up getting for Dermott and Johnsson.
We could have gotten Rielly's RHD partner for years to come and our D corps would be set:
Rielly-Weegar
Muzzin-Brodie
Gio-Liljegren
Sandin
I'm still holding out hope that Calgary doesn't resign Weegar and we can offer a package to get him. It would finally be a long term solution, and our D corp really could be set with Topi waiting to come in when we move on from Brodie, and Sandin ready to fill either Gio's or Muzzin's roster spot.......
You didn't miscast them as a "good offensive team", you miscast them as being "built to win".2018-2019: Toronto Maple Leafs 2018-19 roster and scoring statistics at hockeydb.com
I apologize if I miscast the team with 7 20 goal scorers, and Kadri/Marleau/Nylander/Brown didn't even hit 20, as a good offensive team.
As I said - the defense wasn't good.
As I said - the goaltending was good. Would have been even better had Dubas kept McElhinney over Sparks. Andersen was 2nd in the league in 2018-19 in GSAx, McElhinney was 24th.
They were built to compete. Far better team than the 2014-15 Avalanche.You didn't miscast them as a "good offensive team", you miscast them as being "built to win".
You may also want to re-visit McElhinney's results outside his aberration year. Please don't tell me about cups he won without playing a single minute.
Tkachuk also came in cheaper for Florida, which is critical for them. They just couldn’t afford to resign both Huberdeau and Weegar anyway. Calgary can be a winner here too. One of this rare trades where both teams can be a winner from it.
Tavares is a few years older and looks to be slowing down while Huberdeau seems to be peaking.I find the largely positive reaction to the Huberdeau contract here interesting given how much constant angst there is over Tavares.
Tavares signed his deal when he was 27 years old.Tavares is a few years older and looks to be slowing down while Huberdeau seems to be peaking.
Probably better to judge in 3 or 4 years .
I thought they meant how Tavares deal is seen today not when it was signed.Tavares signed his deal when he was 27 years old.
So more like 2-3 years?