DAChampion
Registered User
- May 28, 2011
- 30,641
- 22,305
Mailloux does have negligible value, but that's because he hasn't played in two years.Carolina took on Deangelo. Not all markets are as media centric as Montreal
Mailloux does have negligible value, but that's because he hasn't played in two years.Carolina took on Deangelo. Not all markets are as media centric as Montreal
Well that's good because we will be happy we kept him 3 years from now. He's gonna be a stud and by then his history will be way behind him.Mailloux has zero value and people need to understand this. He's a pr nightmare people won't take on
Agreed
Fast , young, big
Needs some proper development, and teach him how to take faceoffs better, way better
Allen is necessary to start the year. He's gone at the deadline, or before, depending on Price's health.Allen has to worth something.
But habs need him as well, for now
LOL at Dubois age 24 being considered too old for the rebuild. Suzuki is only one year younger and taking up so much cap space - get rid of him!!...trading for Dubois makes no sense for Montreal atm...we are in no way, shape, or form ready to start trading away futures for "The Now"; that was one of Bargain Bin's biggest failings...if he wants to come "home" on a good contract in two years, fine...
If that was the potential of Fantili and Dvorsky… they wouldn’t be in the discussion for top 5… everybody citing 2003 draft and all… maybe not right off the start at D+1 but we gotta be talking about #1 center potential there, to push Suzuki down at #1B spot. Then we can think about becoming real contender.Dach is already good enough to be considered a 3rd C of the future. The trade would never be a complete flop.
He needs to learn how to use his size too gain access to the O-zone rather than try to go around opposing Ds continually. he also needs to work on his shot and make a conscientious effort to use it more in order not to be a predictable one-trick pony.
Face-offs? He really needs to improve in that department because, so far, he hasn't completely wowed everyone with his other skills to make that less of a concern.
If Montreal manages to pick up Fantilli or Dvorsky at the 2023 draft, each will end up being a big-bodied, shutdown 3rd line C with offensive upside who could potentially step up to the 2nd line in case of injuries.
Allen is necessary to start the year. He's gone at the deadline, or before, depending on Price's health.
Montreal will likely place Byron on the LTIR to start the year and might start with a smaller lineup than the 23-player, maximum roster size.
I suspect 7 D and 12 forwards, plus two Gs.
DeAngelo was a proven 50 pts producerCarolina took on Deangelo. Not all markets are as media centric as Montreal
Well that isn't reality but actually conjecture on your part.
We have no clue who would be inquiring nor what they would be willing to part with.
Teams don’t want to lose their cap space for player with terms like armia/hoffman. And if Armia/Hoffman would be UFA this summer. Not sure they would find a team/or . Their salary (aav) would be lower.
What???If Montreal manages to pick up Fantilli or Dvorsky at the 2023 draft, each will end up being a big-bodied, shutdown 3rd line C with offensive upside who could potentially step up to the 2nd line in case of injuries.
Please no more players on a descent. It's enough we have Gallagher, Hoffman and Savard.hoping some of our rentals have great seasons so we can move them for 1sts or 2nds ( then move up ) this draft keeps looking better every day
put Dadonov with Suzuki with PP1 on a contract year im sure he will play hes ass off
hopefully Drouin and Byron can stay healthy and have a descent season also
Have you seen him play during that shortened sample? The kid has a lot of offensive potential. That may or may not translate to the NHL but he’s big, skates well around people and has a great shot. Teams will trade for the potential he has even with the baggage. That being said, better to keep him around and translate that potential to the AHL first and see what’s up.DeAngelo was a proven 50 pts producer
Mailloux have played something like 15-20 games in the past 2 years. The problem with Mailloux is not only the legal affaire, but the game he lost in his development
last year of Allen’s contract. He’s more than likely going to get traded at one point during this season to make sure we get something for him.
hoping some of our rentals have great seasons so we can move them for 1sts or 2nds ( then move up ) this draft keeps looking better every day
put Dadonov with Suzuki with PP1 on a contract year im sure he will play hes ass off
hopefully Drouin and Byron can stay healthy and have a descent season also
...trading for Dubois makes no sense for Montreal atm...we are in no way, shape, or form ready to start trading away futures for "The Now"; that was one of Bargain Bin's biggest failings...if he wants to come "home" on a good contract in two years, fine...
Well that's good because we will be happy we kept him 3 years from now. He's gonna be a stud and by then his history will be way behind him.
...trading for Dubois makes no sense for Montreal atm...we are in no way, shape, or form ready to start trading away futures for "The Now"; that was one of Bargain Bin's biggest failings...if he wants to come "home" on a good contract in two years, fine...
It's a win now and win in the futureI can't believe that we still have posters pretending acquiring 24-year olds is a win now move. Unbelievable.
It's a win now and win in the future
It's a win now and win in the future
It's win now cuz it pushed the habs forward when the main goal should be to secure Bedard, mychkov or fantilli.
Short term pain for long term gains. I see nothing wrong with that approach.
Then who knows maybe we can compete after the 2023 draft or need just one more top 5 pick to get the ball rolling, which coincides well with Dubois and his Ufa status
agreed if PLD can be had a good GM explores , even more when the player wants to put the CH onAnybody who thinks a team should avoid acquiring a young, bonafide top-6 center who wants to play for your team to minimally increase your minimal chances at getting Bedard or whoever should not be taken seriously when talking about how hockey teams should be built.
So why not get him for free in 2 years ? Why waste big assets for him when he's hellbent to come here. Why would we ever wanna waste assets when we won't compete anyways.Anybody who thinks a team should avoid acquiring a young, bonafide top-6 center who wants to play for your team to minimally increase your minimal chances at getting Bedard or whoever should not be taken seriously when talking about how hockey teams should be built.
Could be the case, if the deal is to rich. Kent will wait I suspectSo why not get him for free in 2 years ? Why waste big assets for him when he's hellbent to come here. Why would we ever wanna waste assets when we won't compete anyways.
So why not get him for free in 2 years ? Why waste big assets for him when he's hellbent to come here. Why would we ever wanna waste assets when we won't compete anyways.