Kurtz
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2005
- 10,525
- 7,761
Am I the only one who thinks Hall would be a terrible fit on the Leafs first line with Matthews-Marner?
Why?
Am I the only one who thinks Hall would be a terrible fit on the Leafs first line with Matthews-Marner?
Am I the only one who thinks Hall would be a terrible fit on the Leafs first line with Matthews-Marner? Could only see him playing with JT-Willie or a 3rd line of his own; likely no defensive line if that's the case.
I'd have him on the 2nd line to load it up as much as possible and try to convince teams to take their best d off of Matthews.I’m not a fan of acquiring Hall, but if we did, I’d play him on the third line.
The idea of the shut-down third line is dead isn’t it? Use Hyman-Matthews-Marner to just overpower opposing tip lines.
Primarily Marner but Matthews as well drives play on that line where the puck is almost always on their stick, part of the reason why a Zach Hyman type player works so well on that line, he compliments them with his play in the dirty areas, forechecking & play off the puck; that's not Taylor Hall, his strength is driving play himself with the puck on his stick, he's not great off the puck so you just wouldn't get nearly as much out of him, or you may just get less out of Marner and/or Matthews. As Babcock would say "there's not enough puck to go around"; this is an extremely prominent concept if you watch basketball, but it very much exists in hockey as well.Why?
I’m not a fan of acquiring Hall, but if we did, I’d play him on the third line.
The idea of the shut-down third line is dead isn’t it? Use Hyman-Matthews-Marner to just overpower opposing tip lines.
I wouldn't say so somebody has to play against opposing teams top lines and take responsibility for D-zone draws, even if it's split between multiple lines. That HEM line is great if they can find a way to keep Hyman on that third line as his primary line.I’m not a fan of acquiring Hall, but if we did, I’d play him on the third line.
The idea of the shut-down third line is dead isn’t it? Use Hyman-Matthews-Marner to just overpower opposing tip lines.
Simmonds - Matthews - MarnerHyman - Matthews - Marner
Galchenyuk - Tavares - Nylander
Hall - Engvall/Kerfoot - Mikheyev
Simmonds/Thornton - Kerfoot/Engvall/Spezza. - Spezza/Simmonds
Not bad
Palmieri feels like a very Boston or Islanders type pick up
I think the HEM line will be a playoff line similar to Sami Pahlsson's line when Anaheim won the cup especially if there is a particular player or line that is really dangerous.Simmonds - Matthews - Marner
Galchenyuk - Tavares - Nylander
Hall - Kerfoot - Spezza
Mikheyev - Engvall - Hyman
Or even this, have Hall take a lot of shifts off Galchenyuk & Hyman takes a lot of shifts off Simmonds.
Keeps the HEM line to take on a lot of defensive responsibility/assignments & D-zone draws, with the top line taking some d-zone draws and matchups (mostly with Hyman) & the third line even taking the odd d-zone draw as Spezza is a faceoff specialist & Hall even has the ability to burn guys up the ice.
I like yours too but I prefer this personally not ideal, it has its flaws (obviously with Simmonds up there) but so will any combination here
Thornton I'd hope
Hall Matthews Marner
Gally Tavares Nylander
Mikheyev Engvall Hyman
Simmonds Kerfoot Spezza
Honestly can't say I'm all the familiar of that line.I think the HEM line will be a playoff line similar to Sami Pahlsson's line when Anaheim won the cup especially if there is a particular player or line that is really dangerous.
I don’t hate the idea of Tanner Pearson.
The Pahlsson line was a shutdown line that Carlyle used and at one point can't remember which game, they actually had more TOI than the first line, I don't think the HEM line will be leading TOI but I think they can be used anywhere, which is why I believe is the main reason the are looking at a Forward at trade DeadlineHonestly can't say I'm all the familiar of that line.
But I do think the HEM line is designed quite well to shutdown fast & dangerous lines especially because they can skate with them & have good reach & sticks & Hyman just brings everything you'd need & want; would be better if Engvall were more engaged physically & better on draws, hopefully that will come.
I think it's important that Engvall in particular is given a more specific assignment/focus/emphasis in trying to shutdown opposing lines/players; he isn't a natural like Mikheyev or Hyman yet in this particular role but does have the ability.
I wouldn't say so somebody has to play against opposing teams top lines and take responsibility for D-zone draws, even if it's split between multiple lines. That HEM line is great if they can find a way to keep Hyman on that third line as his primary line.
I don’t hate the idea of Tanner Pearson.
Very true but I'd ideally I hope they could at least split a good chunk of that with another line so that they could get some easier matchups themselves.Bergeron, Kopitar, and Toews did the checking for those elite teams. No reason Matthews can't do that. Flanked with Hyman and Marner, that's a pretty good defensive line.
If you're using just this year sure, he's faced what 80 shots total?
But for their NHL careers Gibson has averaged about 4 HD shots against per 60 mins. Stolarz is over 10.5 HD SA/60 and for his career is still over .800 in terms of SV%. It's important to look at volume vs average workload when looking at these numbers.
Also I'm not saying trade for Stolarz to be an elite goalie. I'm saying to add depth. Stolarz behind this defense is likely better than Hutch.