To sum up my thoughts: I’m not upset about signing Krug, I do think he is a good addition to our d-core. Just not as a backup plan to losing Pietrangelo.
I am upset in how we lost Petro. As it seems mismanagement with other prior moves, and an unwillingness to meet some (in my opinion) relatively easy concessions is what lost us an elite defenseman. See the tweet below for example:
In the worse case scenario that Pietrangelo’s game absolutely fell off a cliff and hit rock bottom, the last few years of the contract even without a no movement clause would boil down to the “farewell before retirement” tour anyway. So an NMC and some signing bonuses which from Armstrong’s other quotes sounds like ownership was on board to pay seem like very easy concessions to make to sign an elite d-man of Pietrangelo’s caliber. Especially since from other reports it seems like they did agree on the actual dollar amount and 7 or 8 years wasn’t a difference maker for Petro.
we definitely didn’t lose him because of something we absolutely couldn’t give/afford or because some team came in and blew us out of the water with an outrageous offer we couldn’t match. Armstrong mismanaged the whole situation starting about a year back, and then chose to dig his heels in for the wrong negotiation.
Edit: based on the linked tweet even though Armstrong offered a partial NMC, I think it was offered after much damage had been done in the negotiations, and it’s still not the full NMC Petro was/is looking for. While I do agree you don’t want to hand those out along with huge money contracts to everyone, a player of Pietrangelo’s caliber I believe is the exception to the rule.
Heard on Sirius XM earlier in the day that we were interested in Corey Perry...
Of all the forwards available, I hope to god we don’t sign him!