I still like our odds of keeping Edwin. We can pay the man the 20 million or whatever he is asking for no problem.
So what's better, to wait for Sanchez to fatigue and take him out completely or to just move him to the bullpen before he's actually fatigued and continue to get him to contribute late in the season? Seems like an obvious answer.
"Youth pitchers’ tissues have been shown to adapt to joint loading during pitching (6,7). Continued tissue adaptation, up until skeletal maturity, to repetitive mechanical loading can be a logical reason to limit consecutive season (year-to-year) increases in cumulative workload for a young pitcher. The theory being, young pitchers’ tissues have not had sufficient time to fully adapt to the cumulative workload experienced during a full MLB season. Following this theory, this may result in young pitchers’ tissues accumulating a greater level of cumulative damage during a single season, when compared to older pitchers with suitable tissue adaptation. Since the accumulated damage is in theory of a greater level in young pitchers, the offseason may not be a sufficient period of time for the required
healing/tissue adaptation to occur for the young pitcher to be able to pitch a greater number of innings the following season without an increased risk of injury."
https://www.researchgate.net/public...lely_by_restricting_number_of_innings_pitched
The article concludes that inning limits do not work BECAUSE they are not an accurate (at all) predictor of actual effort, however it does also conclude (or rather, assumes) that increasing said effort is a bad idea.
what if he feelss fine and wants to continue pitching? aren't you also treating him like an asset with this logic?
Or one could say "Chris Sale" who went form 71 innings as a 22 year old to 192 innings the year after to no ill effect.
or let's go further
Kershaw:
20 y/o - 107 innings
21 y/o - 171 innings (30 starts)
Scherzer:
23 y/o - 56 innings
24 y/o - 170 (30 starts)
Bumgarner
20 y/o - 111 innings
21 y/o - 204 innings
Tillman
24 - 86 innings
25 - 206 innings
It seems you can go through all the best pitchers the league and it's the same deal. Kyle Hendricks went from 80 innings to 180. Jose Fernandez pitched 4 innings as an 18 year old in the minors, 134 the next, and pulled 172 as a rookie 20 year old.
The conversation with EE starts when you add 7 or 8 million to that total.
There are hardly any top hitters in the free agent market. Bautista's performance/injuries have hurt his value, EE's value has only gone up. He is going to get a massive, giant deal from somebody.
Toss him out there till his arm falls off then send him to the glue factory.
Texas is the favourite to win the A.L. Jeff Blair was talking about this earlier today.
Thank you, good article. As you've pointed out, the article states that inning limits do not work.
He's a DH. Teams aren't going to pay a DH 27-28 million.
Well if Jeff Blair said it!
Texas has a +9 run differential. They've been mediocre with a lot of luck. Their additions likely mean that they won't fall quite as far back as it looked like they might, but they're not a clear favourite.
So you will continue to believe the Jays, despite their increased reliance on science via the enhancement of the analytics department and the creation of the high performance department, don't have evidence to support their decision, until such time as they choose to make the science public?
Yes, explaining the science behind inning limits as an industry secret is a conspiracy. Besides, research would be far more fine tuned than an arbitrary number.
Texas definitely improved themselves but that rotation is still complete dog ****.
I still don't think there is a favorite in the AL. It's really a toss up at this point.
The Boston Redsox will. And the year he is having, he is worth that money.
Texas has poor SP depth, but it certainly looks like they'll make the playoffs. In the playoff series they can do the following:
Start Darvish/Hamels in 4 games of a 5 game series.
Start Darvish/Hamels 5 times in a 7 game series.
That is, unfortunately, superior to what the Jays can present (without Sanchez).
That's if Darvish arm holds up....a lot of faith to put in a guy coming off TJS.
Will you continue to believe that priests, despite their cumulative millions of years practicing the art of religion, are able to communicate with God better than I can?
I find your deferral to authority on this subject quite surprising given that up until now your posts have always relied on hard proof and hard data.
Keep in mind that the Jays high performance department was put in place largely to prepare players for the rigors of the season, both mentally and physically. They seem to have done so with Sanchez in particular, who's put on 15 lbs of muscle for the purpose of durability. Having been on the job for but a few months, it is unlikely that they have any more vital data on pitcher durability than what is publically available. This is further supported by the fact that there is absolutely no precedent (as far as I can tell) of a sp preforming as well as Sanchez has been, being placed in the bullpen. How can you have research on something that's never been done before?
He's a DH. Teams aren't going to pay a DH 27-28 million.
Even Boston has a budget and I highly doubt they would want to commit 30 million to a DH.
He is not worth that money. Josh Donaldson is worth that kind of money.
That's if Darvish arm holds up....a lot of faith to put in a guy coming off TJS.
I'm not sure what religion has to do with this topic at all. Baseball people know what they are doing. This is done by every single team in the Majors. This has always been the plan from day 1. Regardless of performance.
David Ortiz is done after this year. They are paying him that kind of money, and he is a DH. Edwin is the perfect replacement for him for around the same money.