Contracts included should be in the title.
updated
Contracts included should be in the title.
I will take the guy with 2 rockets, a hart trophy, a Ted Lindsay trophy, the rookie of the year, ans has played playoff games.
Over the guy that's done none of those things.
There is no legitimate argument here.
Matthews is a great goal scorer. But the first year McDavid decided to focus more on goalsI doubt that to be honest as he is 12 goals behind and has played in 43 more games during the overlap of their time in the league.
Not to mention top 10 finishes are like this,
Matthews 1,1,2,3
McDavid 1,2,6,6,7,10
His one outlier year some experts were saying that. Never before or again. You are living in the past off Matthews one year that was his career year. And it was a great year to be sure.Trust the science! Experts are telling us Matthews is 1B to McDavid's 1A (some years). Stutzle is not even close.
You're pretty clearly ignoring contracts, age, health, and last year's performances if you legitamately can't see an argument for Stutzle here.
Or did you not see the (contracts included) part? If that's the case, then I see where you're coming from.
Stutzle has a better 20 year old season then Matthews. But that's Stu peak apparently. Yet noone can give me an example of a 20 year old whose peaked. Yet here we are, leaf fans saying Stu has peaked and Matthews hasn't.
One year for Stutzle was a 56 game season, but I’m sure you knew that,
Stutzle joined the League a year younger at 18 as well because Matthews missed being drafted a year earlier by a day or 2, and started at 19.
That’s nice and all, why quote me, if you don’t address any of the points.Matthews is the better player
Ever heard of a rebuild?Exactly.
Matthews has helped his team get into the playoffs at least.
What has Stutzle accomplished in his first three seasons to better Matthews? Where are his trophies?
Matthews as the player still comsiderably ahead
Contracts included its closer
Expecting Matthews to be around 55 goals and 105 pts
Stutzle similar year to this season.
Contracts included would take Stutzle though Matthews is still on 11.634M for this year
Matthews is a 100ish pt player and 55 goal scorer with last year being the down year (44 goal and ~94 pt pace)Why is Matthews going to improve by 15 goals and 20 points over last season, while Stutzle stagnates?
I was more wondering why you think Stutzle has peaked at age 21. He had 90 points last year, but you think he's staying at 90 points this year.Matthews is a 100ish pt player and 55 goal scorer with last year being the down year (44 goal and ~94 pt pace)
The improvement is 11 goals and 11 pts which is what he was averaging the past three years before this one
252 pts in 195 games from 2020 to 2022 (106 pt per 82 games).
Stutzle needs to show he is really able to produce at a higher level then this to get expectation he can be a 100-105 pt player like Matthews has been over the past three years
That’s essentially a whose pecker is smaller comparison. Not exactly compelling or impressive either way.Stutzles only been in the league for 3 seasons compared to Matthews’ 7. Even if we go back just 7 seasons, Ottawa still has more series wins than toronto. Ottawa within Stutzles 7th season will have more series wins than toronto.
Roughly an 88 point player***I was more wondering why you think Stutzle has peaked at age 21. He had 90 points last year, but you think he's staying at 90 points this year.
At the same age, Matthews had 73 points in 68 games, so roughly a 85 point player. Over the next season and a bit he blossomed closer into what he is now.
So I was curious why you don't think Stutzle will make a similar improvement and instead has topped out at age 21.
Majority of players dont reach Matthews Peak level.I was more wondering why you think Stutzle has peaked at age 21. He had 90 points last year, but you think he's staying at 90 points this year.
At the same age, Matthews had 73 points in 68 games, so roughly a 85 point player. Over the next season and a bit he blossomed closer into what he is now.
So I was curious why you don't think Stutzle will make a similar improvement and instead has topped out at age 21.
Matthews is better but you take Stutzle everytime considering contracts.
When you float around in the playoffs and have no impact that is what happens
First time I have seen this
People compare D+1, D+2, D+ 3 years if they align
I get Marner spent an extra year in OHL so the comparison isnt straight for him and Stutzle but Matthews and Stutzle both played their ELCs out right away so a direct comparison is there
Ya when comparing peckers is such a compelling argument.That’s essentially a whose pecker is smaller comparison. Not exactly compelling or impressive either way.
But he wasn’t so played at 19 instead of 18.What site can I find Stutzles playoff stats on? Google didn't turn up anything.
Its stupid reasoning anyways.
Matthews was born after the draft cutoff so somehow hes at fault here? He would've been in the NHL at 18 had he been born a few days earlier. Heck, at 18 he was playing in the Swiss league and had a fantastic year playing against men.
Really splitting hairs today I see.But he wasn’t so played at 19 instead of 18.
Heck, Stutzle played in the DEL at 17.
Really splitting hairs today I see.
Ya a lot of that going on, especially since your comparing peckers,Really splitting hairs today I see.
There are some very creative arguments in this thread.
Oh I don’t compare peckers personally. I always lose. No comparison to be hadYa a lot of that going on, especially since your comparing peckers,
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Oh I don’t compare peckers personally. I always lose. No comparison to be had