Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,308
- 13,624
Ya no idea why the poster would bring those up, best to ask the90Man, this place...
Ya no idea why the poster would bring those up, best to ask the90Man, this place...
But he wasn’t so played at 19 instead of 18.
Heck, Stutzle played in the DEL at 17.
It’s just a fact, some start playing at 18 some at 19, luck of the birthdate.Why is that being held against him ? You can't exactly choose your birthdate...
Only one less than Matthews.How many series wins during Stutzle's time in the league?
Ever heard of a rebuild?
Yep after rebuilding for 14 years of not making the playoffs, making it once in a 48 game season. Matthew’s was their 5th pick in the top 7 overall. Sens have a ways to go before matching the 14 years.Matthews joined the worst team in the league and immediately took them the playoffs ....
ok wtf this site has lost all credibility
Why, because the majority prefer Stutzle and $5 million in cap room.?ok wtf this site has lost all credibility
Stutzle is a mid-January birthday, there was only a four month gap in their relative ages in their first season after being drafted.It’s just a fact, some start playing at 18 some at 19, luck of the birthdate.
Right, so about 1/2 season of games, but one season of development.Stutzle is a mid-January birthday, there was only a four month gap in their relative ages in their first season after being drafted.
I did see that but It doesn't make a difference to me.
Cap hit doesn't make one player better than another, I also don't think 1 year of Stuzle putting up only slightly better offensive totals than Matthews makes him the better player.
Not when Matthews crushed him offensively the previous 2 years,
and continues to crush him defensively considering he's already been top 10 in Selke voting, and now that he's on the PK I expect that to improve.
1 year of slightly better offensive totals isn't enough
You're such a homer. lol
I get picking Matthews, but to suggest you can't fathom why someone would pick Stutzle is such a homer take. Especially when the majority of neutral fans are picking him. Some Leafs fans are just so out to lunch it's quite amusing.
If you are on this site you have some form of outside perspective other than stats and analytics/eye test/ideology for pretty much every single player.The majority of neutral fans aren't neutral
The majority of neutral fans aren't neutral
no because stutzle has almost no chance of ever being as good as peak matthews and im sure matthews hasn't peaked yetWhy, because the majority prefer Stutzle and $5 million in cap room.
ok wtf this site has lost all credibility
Oh I don’t compare peckers personally. I always lose. No comparison to be had
Including or excluding Stutzle?I wouldn't take any of those guys and Stutzle over Matthews... there are definitely some players, Tuch comes to mind immediately, but not those ones. There are only a few.
How many elite 1C are there?
Feeling like y'all have some history.Probably the most truthful and factual thing you've said on this site.
no because stutzle has almost no chance of ever being as good as peak matthews and im sure matthews hasn't peaked yet
With contracts in the equation, maybe Stutzle, but that's the only way it's him afaic. This thread came up some time last year and I had some Sens fans trying to laugh me out of the building for not thinking Stutzle was/would be the better player. Matthews is literally one season removed from a Hart and 2nd Richard trophy in a row. Last year he was 20 points worse than '22 bc of injuries and still had the same ppg as Stutzle. Even if Stutzle continues to improve, it's not even remotely certain that he does anything as good as Matthews did in 2022.
Lol matthews has a hart lindsay and 2 Rockets the other guy?