Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,308
- 13,624
The guy the skates away from scrums, ya sure.There is a lot more to physicality than hits. Matthews is a powerforward with the frame
The guy the skates away from scrums, ya sure.There is a lot more to physicality than hits. Matthews is a powerforward with the frame
The guy the skates away from scrums, ya sure.
I mean Matthews hits but doesn't fight, but that is irrelevant. More he is elite around the net and along the boards and at protecting the puck. A modern power forward.
Then in his next 3 seasons he becamse the best scorer in the NHL.After three seasons, Matthews put up 73 points in 68 games for a 1.07 PPG. That was his best season to date.
After three seasons, Stutzle just put up 90 points in8278 games for a1.101.15 PPG. That was also his best season to date.
Yes, scoring has gone up, and Matthews went on to put up one spectacular season in 2021-2022.
All I'm saying is, you're comparing the career of a guy with more than twice as much time in the NHL and assuming that Stutzle is close to peaking when Matthews hadn't come close to peaking at the same stage of his career.
It seems unlikely but I guess we'll see what happens.
Matthews is average defensively, an excellent goal scorer and a below average playmaker. Stutzle is average defensively, a great goal scorer and a great playmaker.are you serious?
how can you come to the conclusion stutzle is a better all around player.
Marner is more of a power forward than Matthews is.There is a lot more to physicality than hits. Matthews is a powerforward with the frame
Quit while you're behind.Matthews is average defensively, an excellent goal scorer and a below average playmaker. Stutzle is average defensively, a great goal scorer and a great playmaker.
Stutzle doesn't dissapear on the ice like Matthews does if he's not scoring goals. I'll take him, thanks.
My biggest takeaway from threads like these is that most of the people who post here are only capable of analyzing players using box scores
for now. i think mcdavid will go down as the best goal scorer of his generation.The guy who won the Hart, back to back rockets and has been leading the league in goal scoring since coming in as a rookie.
Stutzle is a stud too though, good contract younger player. I'll take the more established guy that is his generations best goal scorer and also has a great 2 way game.
So none then, cap hit doesn't make one player better than anotherProbably 5 million in cap room
So none then, cap hit doesn't make one player better than another
But the question isn’t who is the better player - it’s who would you take. I consider Matthews the better player, but that $5M goes a long way to retaining other talent or signing UFAs for positions of need. For the current Canucks, I’d pick Stutzle and apply the difference to bolster the Defense.So none then, cap hit doesn't make one player better than another
Sure this sounds good but the 5 million extra was spent on Tarasenko who is at best maybe an average top 6 RW right now?
Take the better scorer and overall player in AM but he is a Leaf so many will take the non Leaf.
Better poll would be Stutzle versus Mack or someone like that.
I doubt that to be honest as he is 12 goals behind and has played in 43 more games during the overlap of their time in the league.for now. i think mcdavid will go down as the best goal scorer of his generation.
mcdavid is 4 goals ahead so far. 303 vs 299.I doubt that to be honest as he is 12 goals behind and has played in 43 more games during the overlap of their time in the league.
Not to mention top 10 finishes are like this,
Matthews 1,1,2,3
McDavid 1,2,6,6,7,10
So the Leafs only have to overpay the top players? Doesn't that cost more?I’ll take the better player. When you have to add ‘contracts included’, the square peg you’re trying to shove into a round hole, is still a square peg.
Unlike smaller and less desirable teams/ cities (like Edmonton), the leafs get to offset his cap hit by having depth players actually wanting to play in their city and taking discounts and ‘prove it’ contracts to do that and fill out depth positions. For this reason, the leafs have been able to put up 110+ point seasons without having to play their stars for 28 minutes a night and full 2 minute powerplays because behind them, their depth is trash.
Pweople here can read but frankly alot of people wouldn't take Stutzle and that one year of Taresneko over Matthews.Stutzle started the year as a 20 y/o and paced for 95 pts.
EVEN if he doesn't progress, the 5 M$ difference makes this poll pretty easy to answer
How is this poll still open?
Considering there's always going to be a few homers, that's a LOT of people who don't even read... contracts included!
Tarasenko only paced for 59 pts last season but 90 the year prior. Hard to say where he'll land this season but still just 31 y/o... And if he plays with Tkachuk-Stutzle, it's looking good for him as long as he stays healthy
That being said, who in their right mind wouldn't take Tim Stutzle and Vladimir Tarasenko over Auston Matthews and Dylan Gambrell?
Nah I don’t at all. Every word was accurate.So the Leafs only have to overpay the top players? Doesn't that cost more?
Also I was under the impression that the Leafs were pretty aggressive in trying to sign Connor Brown? He structured his contract so he could fit the Oillers cap and signed with them. Why didnt he sign with the Leafs? Unless they are willing to overpay for skill players the top guys seem to hold out when negotiating with the Leafs. McDavid, Nuge, Kane, Mcleod all took discounts to sign with the Oil. You may want to rethink your take. It blows
Lol. You go with that.Nah I don’t at all. Every word was accurate.
You missed the part where I said over lap but even taking their full careers this is how they shake out goal scoring ratewise.mcdavid is 4 goals ahead so far. 303 vs 299.
mcdavid intentionally changed his game last season to focus more on goalscoring. considering he smoked the league last season i dont think he goes back. barring injury i think he wins another rocket.
Now do points.You missed the part where I said over lap but even taking their full careers this is how they shake out goal scoring ratewise.
Per 82 games
AM 51 goals
McDavid 44 goals
doesnt make sense to only look at the years they overlap when comparing the generation. you look at their entire careers.You missed the part where I said over lap but even taking their full careers this is how they shake out goal scoring ratewise.
Per 82 games
AM 51 goals
McDavid 44 goals