ChaosAgent
Registered User
- May 8, 2018
- 18,561
- 12,606
Looking at that graph closer, I think that graph just says that Pickett is just cluttered in a pack of good backups/poor starters, which I think is what most people would say about him at this point.
The Y-axis isn't scaled the same as the X-axis, the variation in QBs for "off-target throws" is much smaller than the variation in QBs for "highly accurate throws". Pickett's 52% highly accurate and 24% off-target isn't all that dissimilar to say Mayfield's 50% highly accurate and 21% off-target. That's not saying Pickett is similar to Mayfield, especially after the terrific season Mayfield just had, but rather those results just paint Pickett as being the poor starter/good backup that most reasonable fans would describe him as.
The more damning thing to take from that graph would be how bad Watson and Fields are and how uninspiring Lawrence is. But with Pickett, I think it just paints the same picture that most people already know.
I think Fields' potential is tied to his superior ability as a runner. Throwing the ball he is flawed at best.
I agree that Watson looks outright terrible. It is a testament to the Browns that they have still put together a very good team despite Watson being one of the worst trades & contracts in league history.