Ryder71
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2017
- 25,236
- 12,046
What about C, CB and OL?You guys need to come to grips with the fact that we're going to take a WR earlier than everyone wants.
What about C, CB and OL?You guys need to come to grips with the fact that we're going to take a WR earlier than everyone wants.
He is our starting Lt why would they trade him. They can’t fill all the holes in the draftSpeaking of trades, you wonder what kind of value Dan Moore has around the league?
Cb they just got cb2 and rush and trice will be considered draft picks.What about C, CB and OL?
That's where I'm at. We don't wanna create more holes. As it stands they'll probably flip the OT's to opposite sides.He is our starting Lt why would they trade him. They can’t fill all the holes in the draft
Cb they just got cb2 and rush and trice will be considered draft picks.
We already have two 4ths. I think we should go hard for a center in round 1. Not sure if Jackson is the best answer at CB.He is our starting Lt why would they trade him. They can’t fill all the holes in the draft
Cb they just got cb2 and rush and trice will be considered draft picks.
Hopefully they trade down from 20 and and get more picks. Trade down in the 4th get your 5th back
What are you suggesting exactly? Trade Pickett and draft a QB?Sam Howell to Seattle to serve as their backup, I was expecting them to take Penix to backup Smith but Howell also makes a ton of sense.
The compensation for him was basically the equivalent of a late 3rd/early 4th. I think that's pretty spot on for what I figure they'd get back for Pickett if they moved him.
Speaking of trades, you wonder what kind of value Dan Moore has around the league?
Sam Howell to Seattle to serve as their backup, I was expecting them to take Penix to backup Smith but Howell also makes a ton of sense.
The compensation for him was basically the equivalent of a late 3rd/early 4th. I think that's pretty spot on for what I figure they'd get back for Pickett if they moved him.
What about C, CB and OL?
They absolutely need to take a center early. If they take a WR in r 3 that's ok I guess, but the 1st two picks must be committed for other areas of need. That of course is prefaced by getting a quality WR in FA.Probably the same as Dotson. But I doubt they're interested.
The real question to me here is are people preferring Howell and Ridder over Fields, or are Chicago stubborn that he should have more value, or what?
In any case, yeah, I'd happily take for Pickett, but it seems like the org aren't moving him so *le shrugs*. If anything, a number of analysts are insisting they're still serious about him. I feel like that's probably not worth talking about until camp, but it's there for what it is.
They're gonna take C early.
They'll probably view Moore as an acceptable answer at OT and Jackson as an acceptable answer as CB2. They'll grab some veteran depth to play slot. I don't think either position is off the table but they'll punt them for a year if needs be.
I also wouldn't be surprised if WR slid to the 3rd round though.
Okay, sharing that with some people
The perfect draft for me would be to go, without reaching, T, C, and then best available between WR and CB.They absolutely need to take a center early. If they take a WR in r 3 that's ok I guess, but the 1st two picks must be committed for other areas of need. That of course is prefaced by getting a quality WR in FA.
I don't think any of JPJ, Barton or Frazier will be there at 51.The perfect draft for me would be to go, without reaching, T, C, and then best available between WR and CB.
The perfect draft for me would be to go, without reaching, T, C, and then best available between WR and CB.
I don't think any of JPJ, Barton or Frazier will be there at 51.
I've wondered how they feel about Herbig at C or Daniels at C Herbig at G. It's not ideal for Daniels, I know, but he's done it. And Herbig can't be worse at C/G than Moore at LT, right?.....Right?!Feels like if they want one of JPJ, Barton, or Frazier the only options are:
1.) Take one in round 1
2.) Trade down into late round 1/early round 2
3.) Pretty sizable trade up in round 2
Dunno. JPJ at 20 would be fine but I hate that their hands seem kind of tied at the center position unless they want to risk starting one of the second tier rookies (which tbh I would be fine with)
Good? Wasn't he rated as one of the worst T in the league?IF we get a WR in FA you go with Center in round 1. At least with Tackle, Moore is good not great. But we have a gaping hole at C. You can't aptly chicken wire it as is.
Bradley Bozeman Fromer raven c and panther C
Brian Allen Best 3 availableConnor Williams | NFL Contracts & Salaries | Spotrac.com
Connor Williams contract and salary cap details, full contract breakdowns, salaries, signing bonus, roster bonus, dead money, and valuations.www.spotrac.com
I don't think we're in the position to risk that.I think there's a chance Frazier could be there at 51. I know mock drafts aren't very solid evidence, but he's not in the top 50 on this aggregating site I've posted a bunch in this thread. They have JPJ at an expected draft position of 20.6 (our pick, shocker) and Barton at 28.7.
Just looking at FA: TEN, WAS, MIA, and JAC got their starters. But now DAL, DEN, and BUF probably need C replacements (not sure what their in house options are).
It's going to depend on just how many Tackles and WR go in the first 50 picks. Should be a ton.
I didn't see that. I thought he was good. I'm sure they'll move him to RT anyhow. But if I have to address C or OT it's center.I've wondered how they feel about Herbig at C or Daniels at C Herbig at G. It's not ideal for Daniels, I know, but he's done it. And Herbig can't be worse at C/G than Moore at LT, right?.....Right?!
It wouldn't be my plan A, of course, but if they took a risk and it backfired, maybe it's a better fall back option than Moore.
Then again, I don't know why they would let Cole struggle like he did last year if they had any faith in Herbig.
Good? Wasn't he rated as one of the worst T in the league?
I don't think we're in the position to risk that.
Somebody said he can't play RT.I didn't see that. I thought he was good. I'm sure they'll move him to RT anyhow. But if I have to address C or OT it's center.
CB's and WR's are far deeper in rounds two and three. I just don't wanna try to get cute with a position like that when there's a guy or two available who can be a mainstay for over a decade.Maybe not, but you can absolutely get quality centers in the 2nd round. Pick ~50 really is the sweet spot for them.
I thought the plan was to move Jones to LT. Heard it repeatedly, from Steeler ''insiders''. Kaboly, DulacSomebody said he can't play RT.
I think there's a chance Frazier could be there at 51. I know mock drafts aren't very solid evidence, but he's not in the top 50 on this aggregating site I've posted a bunch in this thread. They have JPJ at an expected draft position of 20.6 (our pick, shocker) and Barton at 28.7.
Just looking at FA: TEN, WAS, MIA, and JAC got their starters. But now DAL, DEN, and BUF probably need C replacements (not sure what their in house options are).
It's going to depend on just how many Tackles and WR go in the first 50 picks. Should be a ton.
I didn't see that. I thought he was good. I'm sure they'll move him to RT anyhow. But if I have to address C or OT it's center.