I get the losing record and I agree he has some direct responsibility for the losses. But he is not 100% the reason. Just as Kenny is not anywhere near 100% the reason that the Steelers win games.
Re this in particular -
In a lot of ways I believe its bull to pay attention to individuals' W-L stat in team sports. There's so many other factors involved.
Yet there is one aspect in which it very much interests me, at least in some sports, and that's the notion that many games end close, giving the key players a huge say in how it goes down.
We know that Pickett has been good in these situations - aberrantly good given the rest of his stats.
Here's some of Fields 4th quarter stats
92 attempts, 51.1 completion percentage, 3 TDs, 6 Ints, 27% 1D percentage, 90 yards lost to sacks.
Those stats get worse if it's within 7. Justin Fields didn't throw a single TD last season with the Bears within 7.
While last year was really bad for him, he was bad at it the year before too. 61 passer rating dropping to 51 when within 7 in his second year, It was only in his first year he saw some success at it with a 69 pass rating in general, rising to 106 in his 18 attempts when within 7. Small sample that got figured out from the looks of it.
Fields has 3 4th quarter comeback/game winning drives (2 from his first year). I think 10 games lost they've been within a score on?
I can't help but think that Fields probably deserves about as much of the blame as is possible to give to a QB for not winning a tight game.
I get being bored rigid by the Steelers' offensive play and wanting to see a more entertaining guy. I dunno if enabling an entertaining young guy is something Tomlin is willing to do right now, but I get looking at a guy who's played aggressive football and yearning for him. But in terms of actually winning games? Fields would have to radically improve.
And if he didn't, then he's just another way of getting really frustrated and wishing that bum would clear out already.