ksens
Registered User
- Mar 8, 2006
- 499
- 721
"Very active" ... someone take away his cell phone before he does something stupid.
I believe that, I know Deboer changed his mind on the Sens in 08 after meeting Melnyk I believeI mean, the purse strings were tight when Eugene was still alive around this time.
Some of the big names for coaching positions being bandied about just weren’t realistic.
A lot of the reason we had the coaches we had is because they were cheap. He’ll, that’s why we have Dorion.
Not to mention, I have it on good authority that Claude Julien as a local guy would never coach Ottawa with Eugene as the owner.
Boudreau has a great track record, the Canucks struggles don't fall on himTwo bad coaches in a row? Guy Boucher came in and did exactly what we needed from him. He took us from a non-playoff team to one shot away from the cup finals. He's not a coach you want for a rebuild. DJ also did a great job throughout the rebuild. All coaches have a shelf life, some shorter than others.
Besides, Boudreau is about to be fired for the second time since we hired Boucher. You're telling me you want that guy???
"Very active" ... someone take away his cell phone before he does something stupid.
The Nuclear Winter of Pierre.Jesus christ the worst news possible.
Has to be time right?
30 percent of this roster aren't NHL players.
Prospect pipeline dry af.
Defence still a mess.
Prodigious waste of money as a budget team.
You’re assuming those calibre D-Men were available… the only ones available were Chychrun and Weegar who was a pending UFA. You spending the 7OA on one of those guys?
I wondered the same thing.I also have to truly wonder if Dorion understands systems etc well enough to identify if a coach is good or bad at implementing them. He never played so he never would have actually had to learn them and execute them. Which might be part of why he is supporting the coach.
He played till he was 19 and gave up after a failed tryout for the jr Senators, I guess you can argue he never got to a high enough level but he did playI also have to truly wonder if Dorion understands systems etc well enough to identify if a coach is good or bad at implementing them. He never played so he never would have actually had to learn them and execute them. Which might be part of why he is supporting the coach.
...and I'm done with supporting the team now until the entire management is cleaned out!
He wasnt playing these types of systems if he never played Jr A especially back then. He never even played Jr B who definitely dont have relatable systems. He wouldnt know unless he was actively coached. I wonder how he even got the GM job of the Jr sens.He played till he was 19 and gave up after a failed tryout for the jr Senators, I guess you can argue he never got to a high enough level but he did play
Nick Paul 6G, 5A, +9
Exactly what the Sens need - hard player to find
Such a bad trade, especially when you factor in the contracts subsequently signed. Big head scratcher there..
Such a bad trade, especially when you factor in the contracts subsequently signed. Big head scratcher there..
Not a head scratcher when you factor in that Paul was a UFA and could (and did) decide his own fate.
I'm confused. Elaborate please.
Yes he did lol. All they had to do was put a 3 in front of it. Dorion wouldn't do it. Was willing to sign for 4 years too.Paul did not want to stay in Ottawa.
Paul did not want to stay in Ottawa.
Yes he did lol. All they had to do was put a 3 in front of it. Dorion wouldn't do it. Was willing to sign for 4 years too.
I have not read anything indicating that. He wanted to get paid what he felt he deserved. Garrioch is on record stating Ottawa offfered 2.5 and Paul wanted 3.0. Ottawa wouldn't budge so he was traded to Tampa and they gave that deal after the playoffs. Ottawa then gave that 3.0 to Joseph instead, hence the head scratch.
It was actually more a dispute about the term as opposed to the salary.
Paul signed a 7 year deal.
After the playoff run when he raised his stock. He was ready to sign 3 million for 4 years.It was actually more a dispute about the term as opposed to the salary.
Paul signed a 7 year deal.