LaPlante94
Registered User
- Apr 12, 2011
- 7,228
- 3,602
People really believe that JT's contract had no effect on Matthews' contract? Do you really think Matthew's would've been ok with making less than a player who he is better than that was brought in as a free agent to a team that was supposed to be Matthews' team?
Why would anyone want to trade Nylander to keep JT? The vast majority of forwards in the NHL have already started to decline by the time they hit 30, and if JT hasn't already lost a step there's a good chance it's going to happen soon. Starting this year or next year we could paying JT 11 mil to put up 70 points.
1) JT was a UFA and Matthews was a RFA. Tavares had leverage while Matthews did not.
2) Tavares earned his contract after playing on terrible teams for 9 seasons and still producing at a PPG. Matthews highest point total was 63 points in 62 games and then he had his highest point total season the year Tavares signed here and after he already signed his extension.
3) Once again, point is proven if Matthews puts himself over the team by thinking he deserves more because he had 63 points in 62 games.
4) Tavares has shown he can drive his linemates to be better and has done it his entire career by making bottom 6 players look like 1st line wingers. Marner doesn't do that as well as Tavares, even though he's younger. So I agree, I wouldn't trade Nylander, I would trade Marner over the other 3 mainly because having 2 elite Centers is much better for the team and Nylander can also play C so that's also be valuable.