nuck
Schrodingers Cat
- Aug 18, 2005
- 11,607
- 2,650
This is what I don't get.
Shanahan, knew enough to grab respected, experienced guys like Lou and Babs to turn this franchise around, and I don't think any rational person would disagree that they did just that.
Of course there were some mistakes made, but holistically at the end of 3 years the team was much better off. Now maybe at this point it was time for a change, and it's been debated to death, so let's agree for a moment that it was time to move on from both guys,
So why does Shanahan move away from the formula that he just successfully used and hand the keys over to a couple of guys with zero NHL experience? I mean it's not some budget team like the Yotes that have to take these kinds of chances because it's all they can afford
I'll even go as far as conceding Dubas, but if you are going to go with a rookie GM, why would you let him hire a rookie coach as well?
The agents have their way with the inexperienced GM, and it seems the players may be having their way with an inexperienced coach.
Just seems like a flawed strategy to me.
Yeah a bit of a gamble for sure. I am not sure what the wunderkind success rate is for GMs winning but there is always a first time I guess. I feel early non there was a big knowledge gap for Shanny and Dubas in high level decision making that did not help either of them, and they both did their training on the job. Now I also think those growing pains are mostly behind them as Dubas put together what looked like a playoff ready lineup on a shoestring budget and the misses in Simmonds and JT would have been less impactful if used differently, or just less. We don't know the Foligno was damaged goods (do we?) or what he may have accomplished in subsequent series.
Now comes the final test for both these guys- you have built a team of your people but you are failing. Can you divest yourself of the attachment to "your guys" and make some immediate adjustments before the big 4 and Rielly burn deeper through their contracts? The biggest problem I had with the presser was they were acting like they weren't on a clock, either to finally do some damage in the playoffs or to win something before their stars are all UFAs. "We need to do better" rings hollow when it is every year but what they should have been saying is "we need to do better now!"
I don't think today means no big changes because that is not something they would advertise this early after the loss, there's no point. They need to consider their options and probably meet with the MLSE Board to explain why they should be given more time. I don't get the sense that Dubas is in trouble, at least with Shanny, as he wouldn't need Board approval to remove him but I am pretty certain given the brief timeline there has not been a vote of confidence from above yet either. I don't think today signals stay or go for Keefe but I would be stunned if there isn't a veteran head coach brought in.