Broberg Speed
Registered User
- Oct 23, 2020
- 7,592
- 5,158
Trading them McLeod to knock Krebs out their lineup and picking him up for cheap would be pretty hilarious.take a flyer on Peyton Krebs
do the right things to win a cup while adding inexpensive young assets with high pedigreeTrading them McLeod to knock Krebs out their lineup and picking him up for cheap would be pretty hilarious.
When has ever, in his career, been able to move the puck out with his feet? He has never, ever been able to break the puck out. Even in juniors he couldn’t. He can join rushes- but he isn’t any sort of puck transporter at all
Many Sabres fans were thrilled with the McLeod deal simply to not have Krebs as the 3C anymore. Would he be a decent 4C on the cheap? Is he a UFA?
utilize him as a wingerMany Sabres fans were thrilled with the McLeod deal simply to not have Krebs as the 3C anymore. Would he be a decent 4C on the cheap? Is he a UFA?
Probably because the best agents who could have success on the other side of the table likely don’t want to. They’re making bank repping players.
NHL GM job security doesn't work like that. You get fired, you got a job lining up right away with more payYep. Jackson signed like 400 million worth of contracts. 5% puts him basically in line with an NHL GM salary without having the headache of fan criticism. Not to mention the fact that if a player fires you, you lose a portion of your income. If a team fires you, you lose all your income. Seems like kind of a no brainer to me
Would have been on offer in the McLeod trade discussions. One year from restricted free agency and pay raise versus higher end, no cap and beginning entry level option the Oil took.
Ask to talk to Kreb's agent before a trade and see if he'll agree to 2 or 3 years at 1M. He wouldn't start in the top six during the first year but would get McDrai shifts, all the wingers get McDrai shifts, then battle for second unit pp and pk minutes. Then he could move up next year if he earns it. That's a real incentive for young players to take less.Would have been on offer in the McLeod trade discussions. One year from restricted free agency and pay raise versus higher end, no cap and beginning entry level option the Oil took.
I liked Krebs as a junior. But not a fit on a Cup running team.
EDIT: Sam O'Reilly is also the slow cook, mid-range, bottom 6 centre option in their system. Short-term guys are Philp and Grubbe.
Don’t GM’s have guaranteed contracts like players? X mill/year for x years?Yep. Jackson signed like 400 million worth of contracts. 5% puts him basically in line with an NHL GM salary without having the headache of fan criticism. Not to mention the fact that if a player fires you, you lose a portion of your income. If a team fires you, you lose all your income. Seems like kind of a no brainer to me
I think Krebs is a bottom six player on a Cup team. I can see Savoie moving into the Skinner top 6 spot in two years. Rest are established veterans. Henrique has 3C likely this season and next. So really only looks like a bottom six utility guy. Krebs is likely at a stage where he wants more certainty with ice-time and opportunity and the requisite Qwan that follows it.Ask to talk to Kreb's agent before a trade and see if he'll agree to 2 or 3 years at 1M. He wouldn't start in the top six in the first year but would get McDrai shifts this year and battle for second unit pp and pk minutes. All the wingers get McDrai shifts. Then he could move up next year if he earns it. That's a real incentive for young players to take less.
Krebs would be a nice add. People are forgetting Jeff Skinner is only signed to 1 year and might be using us to pump his value. Beyond 2 years we will need cheap value players.
I think that with Arvidsson's injury history we likely see him play 65 or less games as well so there could potentially be a chance for an audition for someone like Savoie or Lavoie if this happens.I think Krebs is a bottom six player on a Cup team. I can see Savoie moving into the Skinner top 6 spot in two years. Rest are established veterans. Henrique has 3C likely this season and next. So really only looks like a bottom six utility guy. Krebs is likely at a stage where he wants more certainty with ice-time and opportunity and the requisite Qwan that follows it.
My hope is that Skinner really likes it here like Barrie did and extends for 2-3 years at a reasonable cap hit but a definite raise on his current deal.Krebs would be a nice add. People are forgetting Jeff Skinner is only signed to 1 year and might be using us to pump his value. Beyond 2 years we will need cheap value players.
Am I missing something? As of now wasn't it just an idea floated by Broberg Speed?I'm really like Buffalo redundancy. Skinner, Savoie and soon to be Krebs
NHL GM job security doesn't work like that. You get fired, you got a job lining up right away with more pay
Reading the Sabres forums after the Savoie trade, sounds like Krebs is spinning his wheels in the bottom six over there. Might shake loose in the next while if he doesn't get more of a push by the coaching staff over the next year.Am I missing something? As of now wasn't it just an idea floated by Broberg Speed?
Kane's in the mix too. But I think it's fair to think Savoie and Lavoie get NHL games this season. Course that's if Lavoie isn't waiver claimed or dealt.I think that with Arvidsson's injury history we likely see him play 65 or less games as well so there could potentially be a chance for an audition for someone like Savoie or Lavoie if this happens.
Sprong is entirely one dimensional, even more so than your typical forwards who get accused of that like J. Skinner or Eberle and he apparently has attitude issues, I don't think we have the cover to run multiple guys who either skew or are one dimensional its already going to create challenges just having Skinner and Kane on the same team.Krebs is interesting, but Daniel Sprong is still a UFA, if you're going to take a flyer on a guy, he might be the one.
Kubalik is also just sitting out there.
I'd still like to see a physical winger to round out our bottom 6. If Kane is hurt and J. Brown is in the PB this is a fairly non physical team.Sprong is entirely one dimensional, even more so than your typical forwards who get accused of that like J. Skinner or Eberle and he apparently has attitude issues, I don't think we have the cover to run multiple guys who either skew or are one dimensional its already going to create challenges just having Skinner and Kane on the same team.
I think the focus on forwards should be on filling out the rest of Janmarks 4th line, I think we could use an additional PK forward preferably someone who can take RH draws and a forward who is solid on the forecheck and can toss out the odd punishing body check would be nice.
I'm not sure on how to feel about Krebs, I've been an unapologetic Krebs hater, but it's cause I never saw the upside in him to justify getting drafted in the 1st round, but now that he is on the Marty Reasoner career trajectory, I can kind of see it, he definitely worked hard, but my preference would be someone more experienced for the role.
Don’t GM’s have guaranteed contracts like players? X mill/year for x years?
Edit: wrote coaches but meant GM’s. But I think coaches are similar?
To be fair, an agent working for an agency isn’t taking home all of the ~5% of a players salary. No clue what the breakdown would be, but for example, Wasserman has 3200+ employees according to their website. Paying those salaries needs to come from somewhere. A GMs earnings are their own.Yes, but as soon as that runs out you still have to find another job. Look at a guy like Benning. Would you rather make 2 million a year for 3 years as a GM, or 1.5 million a year for 20+ years as an agent?