BobMarleyNYR
Rangers future on D
both. i'm bored/haven't been well-versed in prospects in 13 years...team wise or prospect wise?
both. i'm bored/haven't been well-versed in prospects in 13 years...team wise or prospect wise?
How professional would it be to be like, "we're trading him to bomb next year."
The optics of saying "Yeah we really wanna be bad enough to get a top 3 pick" aren't exactly great.
i think kreider is worth more then hayes, my guess would be a pick in the teens plus a teams top 3 prospect
Why worry about optics?
colorados second first rounder without a doubt and maybe kaut or timmonsboth. i'm bored/haven't been well-versed in prospects in 13 years...
Once again youre coming after me and clearly being selective in what you want to pull apart from a quote or in your interpretation.Not for nothing, but he was VERY non-committal about Kreider's future when being interviewed post TDL.
It's really easy to come out and defuse a situation by saying something along the lines of "Chris has been a great Ranger and we hope to get something done in the near future" but he didn't.
Once again, RIP @RGY
I've long said that his approach was kind of "organic tanking." Strip it down slowly instead of blowing it up right away so you don't have to basically live at the bottom forever.
Next year should be the bottoming out point with an upward trajectory after that.
Why create a bit of a PR mess when you don't need to?
Remember, not everyone is as dialed into the team as the people here are. There are a ton of casuals who don't know Staal from Karlsson. Announcing that you intend to be terrible risks alienating a pretty substantial portion of the fan base.
It's the same reason why Gorton and Co. were all optimistic about this team and their chances at making the playoffs before the season started, we all knew that there was next to no chance that this would happen (so did they), but most of our fans don't know any better.
Not to mention I can't imagine it would play well with the players actually on the team. I mean its no secret what he's trying to do here, but its another thing to come out and say it.
Signing a guy to a max or near max deal that doesn't coincide time wise with other talent on the roster does absolutely show a lack of a plan.
That's not to say that you can't add any players in free agency. There has to be a middle ground between signing a guy to a max deal and "tanking for 1oa or it's a failure."
I feel as if a majority of people in the Panarin boat are saying that you either buy the Ferrari or you'll be stuck driving a 1986 Carolla forever. I have to believe that we have a middle ground here.
Once again youre coming after me and clearly being selective in what you want to pull apart from a quote or in your interpretation.
“We’re studying all these teams. We’re trying to get as many assets as we can without necessarily going to the bottom. If you look through, you’ll find many teams that had at least a first or a third overall pick, that got lucky and turned it around with a player of that caliber.”
Literally says we are not necessarily looking to go straight to the bottom. They are studying all teams. Evaluating all paths. If they get the 1st-3rd pick then great. But as in the other quote it sounds as though they are open to multiple avenues, including adding talent to all the assets they have accumulated.
And again I guess I have to remind you that I will not be upset if they dont sign Panarin. I, like Gorton, is looking into every avenue to start considering the transition from all of these assets/picks into the next phase.
We get it. You dont want Panarin. Thats your view. Dont bother coming at me because I see a different way. I know crazy. Everyone should all feel the same way. We should all put our eggs i to one basket and pray.
The optics of saying "Yeah we really wanna be bad enough to get a top 3 pick" aren't exactly great.
so lets say #16 from colorado and kaut....you think that isnt market value? because i think it is regardless how i feel about kreiderDoubtful. He gets a mid-first if and only if the team trading for him thinks they can re-sign him. I'm sure they will talk turkey if they were going to pull the trigger.
The top 3 prospect? No. In the last 3 years, it's only happened once where a team traded a top end prospect, and that was Brannstrom for Stone who re-signed. There was no first going the other way.
To ask fans to detach the emotional attachment they have to their favorite player is not a reasonable ask. But every precedent in recent years have shown what you can expect for Kreider.
So who is going to show the young players how to be successful? Jimmy Vesey? Brendan Smith?
They need to sign veteran role models. That’s how a locker room works. Have you ever been in a locker room?
If you come out and say it, you're going to force your players to answer questions about it for the foreseeable future. No need for that, even if they know it's probably where they're going to go. Also an easy way to kill their motivation for what ever amount of games left. Yes good for the tank, but I wouldn't want to go that route either.
When was the last time you saw a GM in any sport basically come out and admit that he was gunning for a top draft pick?
Apparently @RGY does need him to come out and say it directly though.
Adam Fox won't sign with Carolina and will play out his senior year at Harvard. Let's GO!!!
so lets say #16 from colorado and kaut....you think that isnt market value? because i think it is regardless how i feel about kreider
Adam Fox won't sign with Carolina and will play out his senior year at Harvard. Let's GO!!!
Adam Fox won't sign with Carolina and will play out his senior year at Harvard. Let's GO!!!