GAGLine
Registered User
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2007
- Messages
- 24,729
- Likes
- 22,320
And making trades won't hurt our depth? Moving someone like Chytil or Lindgren rather than buying out Goodrow would be better for the team, short and long term? I mean, if we can move Goodrow without adding assets to him, sure, go for it. But then a buyout isn't necessary.Making trades or keeping the player longer. The cap difficulty the dead space creates outweighs the moves made with that money. It causes a weaker bottom 6 and bottom pair, and those things are critical to playoff success.
Buyouts are a tool to be used. Are they perfect? No. But there aren't always perfect solutions. Sometimes is about choosing the option that is the least bad. And keep in mind, GMs don't last forever. Will Drury be more concerned with saving cap space 3+ years into the future, or with keeping players he doesn't have replacements for?