All yours, Detroit. Thanks for the 1sts. Balanced teams at all positions are what win the cup these days. 13 million for a centre who isn't even top 10 in the league is ludicrous.
Off topic now but you got me thinking. Of course depth and balance is a key, but that has not been the main approach of cup winning teams. I think this is a bit of a myth. Securing the depth is something you try to do as good as possible after securing a star core.
21 - Tampa: Kucherov, Hedman, Point, Stamkos, Vasi
20 - Same
19 - Blues: ROR, Pietriangelo, Tarasenko Binnington (they are as close to an exception as you get here, with star but not superstar level contracts, and Binner on cheap first deal when they won)
18 - Caps: Ovy, Bäckström, Kuznetsov, Carlson
17 - Pens: Sid, Geno, Letang
16 - Same
Before that LA (Kopitar, Doughty, Quick) and Hawks (Towes, Kane, Seabrook, Keith, Crawford).
Of course they managed their depth well, but I think the majority of cup winners had star players with high percentage cap hits at the time. We have not seen the Montreal or Islanders-formula with one single cup winner in recent history? (STL being borderline)
This is why I don't bash Toronto as much as some. They will contend for many years. With their roster they can win. It's just damn hard.