Confirmed with Link: Rangers sign Artemi Panarin (7 years, $11.64M AAV)

Status
Not open for further replies.

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,304
8,981
You missed the point there. The fact that we landed a top 2 pick accelerated the “rebuild” , and allowed the Panarin conversation to be had. Im not sure we are talking Panarin today if we had drafted 3rd overall or worse. There is a big curb in talent after Hughes and Kakko.

The difference between drafting Kakko and any other forward that came in after? Leaving the talent to the side it accelerated the rebuild at least by a year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

mas0764

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 16, 2005
14,470
12,296
That just makes our team more expensive and doesn't solve the problem that we have one good center.

The idea is to add to Zibanejad.

The idea is the get better.

I personally believe Aho is a legit #1 center whereas I see Zibby as a Lower end #1 or a higher end #2. Aho is also younger.

IMO if you get Aho, the need for a top scoring second young center becomes way less. Aho will do more of the heavy lifting. You need a long term solution there at 2C, but I’m no longer pining for Byfield. Conversely, right now, I’m 1C hunting.
 

jfc64

Registered User
Jul 2, 2006
4,461
392
It's easy. You take one part of Panarin, a little Trouba and finally some Kakkoa. Just add ice.
 

Jaromir Jagr

Registered User
Apr 4, 2015
5,428
4,897
Long Island, NY
I'll just say something for those of us that didn't want Panarin here.

Us not wanting him had nothing to do with the player. It also had nothing to do with our hope that the Rangers succeed or fail in the coming years. Despite what many say, none of us want to tank for draft picks forever.

However, many of us have waited 15+ years for a true rebuild. We have watched big name stars come and go, whether through FA or trade. Often overpaid. Almost always under-performing. Of course, the true hitch being that not one could bring us a cup. We've seen countless incarnations of teams built around marquee players and our one homegrown star, Hank.

1+ year ago, we finally thought we'd seen a new route being taken. We saw the franchise, with the potential to cling to playoff contention, sell many of its stars. It was unlike what many of us had ever seen from this team before. Then we followed it up with a strong draft and another season of dumping and gathering. Bringing in Fox, Kakko and a young Trouba - filling a position that has seemingly been impossible to fill for those 15+ years - was icing on the cake. One more season of developing and asset gathering was what we'd hoped for.

Now, the rebuild is undoubtedly complete. We are entering compete mode. We are seeking to add, rather than subtract. We are investing big money, in a late 20's winger, something we have witnessed various instances of over the years - Gaborik, Nash, St. Louis. And are still lacking dearly in the center department - again, a common issue that has remained throughout the years.

While I'm sure none of us will stop rooting for them based on this signing, it stinks of same old Rangers. The path that was laid out was not seen through. We didn't add to a place of need, because we never discovered what areas we needed in the first place. Very clearly, we seemed to put the cart before the horse.

This type of operation has always been mired in mediocrity or reached peaks that are just not quite good enough. Which is where our fears will remain until we're proven wrong. I hope I'm wrong, but I have a hard time seeing how this will be any different from those times before.

I know many will find points to disagree with in this post and it's not what it was written for. It was to try and give insight as to what some of us may be thinking in the anti-Panarin camp.
 

Thordic

StraightOuttaConklin
Jul 12, 2006
3,013
722
Serious question: Who are the frontrunners for Kreider? I had thought that Gorton was working deals on the side simultaneously with getting Panarin. But we're mid-afternoon now on the East Coast, and there are no announcements and nothing seems to be brewing.

Gonna be tough to make a substantial trade on free agent day. Until the dust settles the market won't be clear.

For example, Montreal and the Islanders are chasing Lee. If he stays on the island, Montreal would likely be a prime candidate for Kreider. If Lee goes to Montreal, NYI have no offense and you could bend them over the barrel if you wanted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: will1066

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,326
11,122
Charlotte, NC
I'll just say something for those of us that didn't want Panarin here.

Us not wanting him had nothing to do with the player. It also had nothing to do with our hope that the Rangers succeed or fail in the coming years. Despite what many say, none of us want to tank for draft picks forever.

However, many of us have waited 15+ years for a true rebuild. We have watched big name stars come and go, whether through FA or trade. Often overpaid. Almost always under-performing. Of course, the true hitch being that not one could bring us a cup. We've seen countless incarnations of teams built around marquee players and our one homegrown star, Hank.

1+ year ago, we finally thought we'd seen a new route being taken. We saw the franchise, with the potential to cling to playoff contention, sell many of its stars. It was unlike what many of us had ever seen from this team before. Then we followed it up with a strong draft and another season of dumping and gathering. Bringing in Fox, Kakko and a young Trouba - filling a position that has seemingly been impossible to fill for those 15+ years - was icing on the cake. One more season of developing and asset gathering was what we'd hoped for.

Now, the rebuild is undoubtedly complete. We are entering compete mode. We are seeking to add, rather than subtract. We are investing big money, in a late 20's winger, something we have witnessed various instances of over the years - Gaborik, Nash, St. Louis. And are still lacking dearly in the center department - again, a common issue that has remained throughout the years.

While I'm sure none of us will stop rooting for them based on this signing, it stinks of same old Rangers. The path that was laid out was not seen through. We didn't add to a place of need, because we never discovered what areas we needed in the first place. Very clearly, we seemed to put the cart before the horse.

This type of operation has always been mired in mediocrity or reached peaks that are just not quite good enough. Which is where our fears will remain until we're proven wrong. I hope I'm wrong, but I have a hard time seeing how this will be any different from those times before.

I know many will find points to disagree with in this post and it's not what it was written for. It was to try and give insight as to what some of us may be thinking in the anti-Panarin camp.

All of this is basically "I didn't understand the path that was laid out."

There were anti-Panarin reasons that was much more understandable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

Bleed Ranger Blue

Registered User
Jul 18, 2006
19,799
1,811
He would and does. That said, I prefer this contract for the player than I do for the Duchene and Bobrovsky deals.

Agreed. I also am not so sure I'd support this without the Kakko pick and Trouba trade, but the stars aligned quickly and the Rangers pounced. Can't blame them for that.
 

Kovalev27

BEST IN THE WORLD
Jun 22, 2004
21,609
26,074
NYC
Montreal just sent him an offer sheet, 5 years, 42 million, 8.4 per.

Call Carolina and tell them they can have Zibanejad if they’ll trade him to us instead.

What a lousy offer sheet. I’m surprised he even signed it. Montreal did them a favor
 

ReggieDunlop68

hey hanrahan!
Oct 4, 2008
14,441
4,434
It’s a rebuild.
You missed the point there. The fact that we landed a top 2 pick accelerated the “rebuild” , and allowed the Panarin conversation to be had. Im not sure we are talking Panarin today if we had drafted 3rd overall or worse. There is a big curb in talent after Hughes and Kakko.

We were talking Panarin when the dumb ass fans were hoping we'd made a loser point playoff push cuz we ain't tanking.
 

will1066

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
47,873
66,807
giphy-downsized.gif


Kid needs to dump her NOW.
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,326
11,122
Charlotte, NC
Nice response.

It's true. If you thought the path that was laid out included "not signing elite-level UFAs" you were wrong from the very beginning. The goal of the team in starting down this path was to add as much top-end talent through whatever methods were possible at any moment. The most effective way to get multiples of those pieces is through the draft, and the most effective way to draft them is by stripping the team for parts and getting as many picks as possible as high as possible.

But it never, EVER precluded signing a guy like this in free agency. You didn't understand that.
 

HockeyBasedNYC

Feeling it
Aug 2, 2005
20,113
12,185
Here
Faceless-

Richards and St. Louis and Nash were UFA signings and if the Rangers PP had more luck and a couple of posts turned into goals, who knows - we could've had a Cup in 2014.

I've been through all the FA signings as well. Been a fan since 89'. The difference is they never made this type of signing with a Kappo or a Kravstov on the team. The didn't have a stockpile of youth in all positions waiting to crack the roster over the next 3 years either.

I understand and agree with a lot of what you say there, but in the end it's about winning and only winning. I dont think Gorts and JD wouldve made this move if they didnt believe it truly enhances the rebuild they committed to.

Its hard for me to stomach that cap hit too but this summer has been absolutely tremendous. If you think about where this team was at the start of last season and today its pretty mind blowing
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad