Salsa Shark
Registered User
We had a good goal differential on the strength of two Flyer blowouts last year and were not a good teamits an indicator of winning close games, and getting the occasional lopsided loss. Thats it
We had a good goal differential on the strength of two Flyer blowouts last year and were not a good teamits an indicator of winning close games, and getting the occasional lopsided loss. Thats it
I'll take the record we have with the goal differential that is there. Every team gets blown out at times.
It does tell me that we win close games....I would think that should tell us all something, no?
I'd take Reilly Smith any day on this team but you've got to be kidding if you think Gallant is only going to give him 3rd line minutes and certainly not ahead of Kravtsov.
Georgiev is the biggest lockeroom cancer in the NHL and Kinkaid is beloved is my point. Kinkaid was no worse than Georgiev tonight, while being 100x the teammate. Kinkaid is a Brendan Smith like character. Watch the video of the team and Kinkaid at the end of this game and then contrast it with the team and Georgiev after his wins.
Maybe so....but good teams DO lose to lesser teams (lets compare our record against Chicago to Washington's record against Chicago).We aren't really on the level of other teams with similar records. There are a number of indicators of that at this point and goal differential is one of them. Should be fairly obvious at this point.
Really hope this gets Zibs going.
He needs to be leading the way in goal scoring. Saw positive signs last night... Faceoffs was a nice plus as well.
It's a decent indicator of something.
The Golden Knights (Who a half dozen posters here think we shouldn't even bother to suit up against) are +13. Its a crazy talking point IMO. If we are Detroit who is in WC contention with a -27 yea that would be something worth mentioning.its +10 lol
Seriously lol, I know it’s not amazing but some of the talk you’d think it was -30.its +10 lol
Maybe so....but good teams DO lose to lesser teams (lets compare our record against Chicago to Washington's record against Chicago).
Tell me why goal differential means anything.
Not for nothing I see teams going thru Covid issues. No one ever felt sorry for us. We didn’t have it hit all at once but
trouba
Kakko
Chytil
Mika
Fox
Mckegg
Rooney
Strome
Kinkaid
that we know of. I believe I read Lindgren too
all had it already. And again that’s the ones we know of. Between vaccinations and the fact we had so many guys have it already you’d hope knock on wood the worst is behind us here while other teams go thru it
We’re a point out of first place in the whole league. Do people not watch other teams play? Everyone has tough nights. Everyone gets tired everyone has injuries. No one is running out there 30 games in playing 60 mins of great hockey. If they were they’d be 10 points clear of us FFS. We just went thru a ridiculous stretch and gutted out a win that no one will care about in a week. It’s 2 pts shut up
Agree with everything you are saying but they haven't played too many games this year where the ice wasn't tilted against them. We have been hanging on by kreider's start as well as Shesterkin. We need more scoring from guys that should be scoring
The Golden Knights are plus 11 in December as 3 of their best players including their best have come back in the lineup .The Golden Knights (Who a half dozen posters here think we shouldn't even bother to suit up against) are +13. Its a crazy talking point IMO. If we are Detroit who is in WC contention with a -27 yea that would be something worth mentioning.
Thank you...and I appreciate your explanation here (refreshing to have a mature discussion).It's suggestive of the quality of your wins and losses.
If we have 19 wins but only a +10 that means we aren't in general performing as well as a team that has 19 wins but a +27 goal differential.
It's not conclusive but it's suggestive. Combined with other advanced stats and you will see that this team is struggling big time in some areas. That record of ours is a partial mirage, and by that I mean it's either going to be a historical exception (which we shouldn't bank on) or it's not sustainable.
It's not to say we suck. I've long been saying we are a playoff team this year come hell or high water - we have too many good players not to make the playoffs.
But I'm not fooling myself to think this team is going to win multiple 7 game series' against the league's elite. Not happening. A team this bad at 5-on-5 doesn't go on those type of runs.
I reserve the right to amend this conclusion if they DO actually start playing well at 5-on-5, which, with so many young kids having the ability to make leaps, and Zibanejad playing so poorly right now with room to improve, is a possibility.
I’ve been with a few players and staff members. Georgiev is by far the least liked on the team. His attitude and body language continues to reinforce that.Impressive that you know so much about the Rangers' lockerroom dynamics despite never spending time with any of them, but not nearly as impressive as knowing about all the other teams' lockerrom dynamics despite never spending any time with any of them. Kudos sir!
We need more offensive pressure and possession. Shesterkin's start carried us and then Kreider's constant deflection goals also buoyed us, as well as the constant god-mode performance from one of the best players in the world in Panarin.
More than that will be needed to win in 7 games series' in the playoffs.
How do you know* this?
*Apart from your own fantasy, which is arguably bigger than the entire Disney filmography.
Actually its not, considering many teams have made deep runs on the backs of star goalies, a few elite skaters and timely goal scoring.
I'd rather the pizza boy build an elite young team than a second round playoff exit 30 year old team.
Which ones won Cups? That's what I want to emulate. The one that won multiple Cups.
I know the 2012-16 Rangers won multiple series' on the back of a star goalie and timely scoring from, basically, exclusively role players on offense. Not interested in that because again, I know how that ends. Without a ring.
Rangers are the third youngest team in the league, and going to the 2nd round of the playoffs would a succes this year. What the f*** are you talking about?