Vladys Gumption
Colt55
You're up, Blanick!
7-1 ain't so bad. Blanick has his work cut out for him.
You're up, Blanick!
I hate how much room we give up sometimes
Team played **** in front of him but Els played his worst game of the season tonight. Let in a couple iffy goals
Some of you are over reacting big time. We weren't gonna win every single game. Yeah we looked pretty bad and yet we still lost by only 1 against one of the other hottest teams in the league and a great goalie.
It's one game. One. Let's start another streak Tuesday vs. Buffalo.
Team played **** in front of him but Els played his worst game of the season tonight. Let in a couple iffy goals
It has to be a coaching decision right? It seems like all of our defensemen do it.
nobody is over reacting. that was a piss poor effort and there was no excuse for a poor outing like that. this team expects the tarasenko line to bail them out every night and they got outworked for 60 minutes on home ice, that is unacceptable.
If we lose this game by one goal, the lack of finish on that shift is going to haunt us.
This.It's literally a problem of hockey philosophy. The only time you should be surrendering to being purely positional, aka no-man's land, is when you are the last line of defense between 2 opposing players.
Even on a 1 on 1, you should be constantly harassing the puck carrier until the situation becomes a 2 on 1 in or out of your favor.
I really don't understand how professionals don't understand the concept. If you don't close the gap, you're not playing defense. Period.
Whatever it is, we've got to change it. I'm with Carvin. I want them to be aggressive and pressure puck carriers. If we pressure and they make a good move to get around the D, so be it. I'm just tired of giving prime chances up.I guess but that doesn't make any sense given the spiel about quick recovery and transitions. Maybe they don't want our boys being hit on the dump and chase?
It's literally a problem of hockey philosophy. The only time you should be surrendering to being purely positional, aka no-man's land, is when you are the last line of defense between 2 opposing players.
Even on a 1 on 1, you should be constantly harassing the puck carrier until the situation becomes a 2 on 1 in or out of your favor.
I really don't understand how professionals don't understand the concept. If you don't close the gap, you're not playing defense. Period.
“We just have to stay aggressive, that’s the way we play,” defenseman Kevin Shattenkirk said. “That’s our penalty kill, it’s all based off of pressure.Our team is passive on the PK, only makes sense for them to be the same even strength.
Whatever it is, we've got to change it. I'm with Carvin. I want them to be aggressive and pressure puck carriers. If we pressure and they make a good move to get around the D, so be it. I'm just tired of giving prime chances up.
I just want to see the other team's players have to dump it in besides when they're going for a change.
I heard Gordie Howe once talk about how hockey has changed the most, and he said that it was that we are so quick to give teams our blue lines nowadays. I completely agree with him. If the defender gives the opposition an easy entry, half of the battle is already won.