which was the worse pick.
Virtanen @ 6
or
Juolevi @ 5
Juolevi.
Virtanen, at the time, was drafted around where he was ranked. He was viewed as a swing for the fences type pick, and there were a lot of scouts who felt he was a potential home run pick. Hindsight has been ugly on this one, but I don’t fault the logic for the pick at the time.
Juolevi was clearly a case of drafting for position, BPA be damned. They reached, left better players on the table, and it certainly seems bleak right now. I was and am still confident he will be an NHL player, and I don’t loathe the pick as some do, but compared with the logic for the Virtanen pick, this was poor strategy and execution. IMO.