Salary Cap: Pens Summer Salary Thread: We Hayes Dubas's offseason moves so far
- Thread starter Zirakzigil
- Start date
- Status
Gurglesons
Registered User
Freeptop
Registered User
I'm not judging the hire either way, but I continue to be confused by the idea that hiring people you already know and trust is somehow just "cronyism and nepotism".
It's far better to hire someone you already know can work with you and get the job done (as you see it, mind you), than hiring someone you don't know on the off chance they might be better.
If I could grab a select set of my former coworkers to join me at my current place of employment, I, too, would do it every time.
Yes, it's a problem if the person is bringing along unqualified people. That tends to happen if the person making the decisions is unqualified. Maybe that's the case here. But Clark seems to actually be qualified for what he is being brought in to do? Maybe it's a case of the blind squirrel finding the nut, but it's kind of weird how some people just jump to the conclusion that it must be a had hire because he worked with Dubas previously.
It's far better to hire someone you already know can work with you and get the job done (as you see it, mind you), than hiring someone you don't know on the off chance they might be better.
If I could grab a select set of my former coworkers to join me at my current place of employment, I, too, would do it every time.
Yes, it's a problem if the person is bringing along unqualified people. That tends to happen if the person making the decisions is unqualified. Maybe that's the case here. But Clark seems to actually be qualified for what he is being brought in to do? Maybe it's a case of the blind squirrel finding the nut, but it's kind of weird how some people just jump to the conclusion that it must be a had hire because he worked with Dubas previously.
Tom Hanks
Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
- Nov 10, 2017
- 31,480
- 34,057
CheckingLineCenter
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2018
- 9,446
- 10,295
Gurglesons
Registered User
Not sure I get the juxtaposition.
Tom Hanks
Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
- Nov 10, 2017
- 31,480
- 34,057
Lots of that’s what she said in the replies 
- Jun 13, 2010
- 42,901
- 21,793
Can't for his spin on this one.
This is worse than any political campaign bomb we've seen in recent history. I think it speaks heavily to his vendetta against the organization for firing Hextall. As I've said...Ron Hextall...what an incredibly odd hill to choose to not only die on but to dig your grave 50ft under while doing it. Just absolutely bizarre.
66-30-33
Registered User
Ugene Magic
EVIL LAUGH
Ryder71
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2017
- 24,601
- 11,716
He's not a serious person. It's all show and no go!Can't for his spin on this one.
This is worse than any political campaign bomb we've seen in recent history. I think it speaks heavily to his vendetta against the organization for firing Hextall. As I've said...Ron Hextall...what an incredibly odd hill to choose to not only die on but to dig your grave 50ft under while doing it. Just absolutely bizarre.
CheckingLineCenter
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2018
- 9,446
- 10,295
all in good fun
Dawg this is bizarreCan't for his spin on this one.
This is worse than any political campaign bomb we've seen in recent history. I think it speaks heavily to his vendetta against the organization for firing Hextall. As I've said...Ron Hextall...what an incredibly odd hill to choose to not only die on but to dig your grave 50ft under while doing it. Just absolutely bizarre.
FYI - I believe I liked the Hextall hire, so I have some bad posts too.
Ryder71
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2017
- 24,601
- 11,716
Carolina is pretty good also. But Clark is quite capable. Most leaf fans on the message board are livid. lol
Empoleon8771
Registered User
Honestly, I'm more inclined to agree with Gurgs' take regarding the Karlsson trade. At the time, I was all for the trade and saw no downsides in it. And even now, I don't think there is a ton of downside because I bet they get a 1st back for Karlsson in the future. But I think this team showed last year that it's no longer a team you spend a 1st round pick to make better.
I don't mind the trade at this point because I think you get a 1st back for Karlsson in the future. But I think there's an extremely easy argument to make that they were better off not doing that deal and just eating the remaining years/money on Petry, Rutta and Granlund.
I don't mind the trade at this point because I think you get a 1st back for Karlsson in the future. But I think there's an extremely easy argument to make that they were better off not doing that deal and just eating the remaining years/money on Petry, Rutta and Granlund.
CheckingLineCenter
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2018
- 9,446
- 10,295
Truly don’t care if they get anything back in a trade for Karlsson. EK could retire here and trading him was the right move. I will defend it until the end of time. You absolutely had to pull the trigger that deal.
Dubas f***ed up badly with Jarry and Graves. Acciari getting a 3rd year is painful. But I’d still make the EK deal with hindsight, even if it wasn’t a home run.
Also, not that anyone cares anymore but he was legit good on the ice last year.
Dubas f***ed up badly with Jarry and Graves. Acciari getting a 3rd year is painful. But I’d still make the EK deal with hindsight, even if it wasn’t a home run.
Also, not that anyone cares anymore but he was legit good on the ice last year.
Ugene Magic
EVIL LAUGH
Plus, to get a 1st in any Karlsson trade requires probably max retention, extending the negative return to 4 to 6 years term.
Empoleon8771
Registered User
They're not going to be moving Karlsson until 2026 or 2027, where they'll retain half of his deal and get a 1st back for him probably.
Jag68Sid87
Sullivan gots to go!
I would have preferred Wendel Clark, circa 1988, but Wes Clark is fine.
As for Karlsson, it was a good trade then, and it is a good trade now.
As for Karlsson, it was a good trade then, and it is a good trade now.
Because none of them are best buds with Dubas or Sully.
66-30-33
Registered User
Tom Hanks
Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
- Nov 10, 2017
- 31,480
- 34,057
Yeah it wasn’t the Karlsson trade it was other/lack of other roster moves. We should have made playoffs last year but didn’t.
Obviously coaching is part of it but the roster just didn’t have great depth which is a must have these days.
Ryder71
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2017
- 24,601
- 11,716
He's just fortifying his power here. We're already getting a good number of prospects from Europe, you're likely to see an uptick in that now.
Considering our lack of depth and our core aging out why should we have made the playoffs last year?
Last edited:
CheckingLineCenter
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2018
- 9,446
- 10,295
Yeah maybe a couple players in the range of the 1st will be really good and we can sit here and one day say with hindsight that Dubas should have started this kind of soft rebuild a year earlier. But at least we know that they weren’t so close to contending that effing EK couldn’t push them over the top, much less the playoffs.
Also- Can you imagine if Dubas didn’t try to win last summer and Sid had that year? KD’s head would be on a spike outside PPG.
Also we moved out a bunch of absolute trash and a mid first. It wasn’t horrible like the Duchene or original EK deal were where you lost a top 5 pick.
Turin
Erik Karlsson is good
- Feb 27, 2018
- 24,141
- 28,608
Graves yes, probably. Jarry, even though I despise him at this point, that's too early to say imo. Biggest mistake was sitting on his hands while the powerplay sunk the team - Pens shouldn't have been in a " lets see what we have here" mode last year.
But yea, 100%.. Karlsson was the most "you make that deal every time" trade the Pens have done in a long time. Fix the powerplay and he has 70 points and the Pens make the playoffs.
- Status
