cpsman
Registered User
- Aug 18, 2010
- 2,101
- 640
There is accountability just not to the fans or media. For example look at who gets to ref the playoffs...generally the refs who have the fewest screw ups.
Your idea wouldn't work because of the fact that the law of averages dictates that both teams will have an equal chance of being on the short end with referee interference. This is a neutral party to both teams.
A too many men penalty is there to stop teams from taking advantage of having more players then the other team at any point in the game. This benefits one party and is why it is penalized.
Your explanation makes sense, and I can see why my idea hasn't been implemented previously. But at the same time the law of averages could also dictate that if you blew the whistle every time the official touched the puck, the advantage or disadvantage for the stoppage in play would even out between each team as well.
Anyway, its just a thought.
Also, I disagree with your accountability argument. They still get to ref a full season of hockey. Playoffs are a bonus, and they still get to ref the first couple of rounds. I don't think "not being able to ref game 7 of the cup finals" is a punishment. Only 2 refs get to do that, and its obvious that the best refs will be given that duty.
Thats the reality of life. If you do your job you get rewarded.
But the opposite of that does not exist in NHL officiating. There are no fines, or suspensions or any sort of repercussions of making consistent, or blatant errors. Like I said previously, if I mess up in my job there can be huge consequences. Its not just "oh hey, you made a glaring error. I guess you won't get that promotion you wanted."