Michel Beauchamp
Canadiens' fan since 1958
Does Kessel at the equivalent of $9.9M work better for you ?So we're using one offs now? Matthews better be signing for less than Crosby than.
Or Kane at the equivalent of $12.1M ?
Does Kessel at the equivalent of $9.9M work better for you ?So we're using one offs now? Matthews better be signing for less than Crosby than.
A back-to-back 30-goal centreman who is effective at both ends of the ice and making $4.5 million through 2022 is a prime candidate to be traded?
Um, no. Kadri isn't going anywhere, unless someone massively overpays.
Yep.
It happened a lot of times for sure.
But funnily enough I can't find any examples of this...
Philadelphia is still waiting breathlessly for a counter-strike from Nashville.
Not really as like before, still a one off.Does Kessel at the equivalent of $9.9M work better for you ?
Would love to see Nylander sign a one year deal in SHL or an offersheet to put the "no leverage" talk to bed. He's got the ability to sign with any other NHL team willing offersheet him, or play in a different league, of course he has leverage.
Where did I ever claim that ???Are you seriously comparing Alex Ovechkin to Mitch Marner? In his first two season Ovi had 198 points 98 of which were goals. Marner has 130 points 41 of which are goals. Of course Ovi got paid as a winger he completely tore up the league, Marner isn't even the best player on his team.
Or a two off ?Not really as like before, still a one off.
Or a two off ?
Ans as I added, Kane at the equivalent of $12.1M ?
That's a lot of "off" !
Here's a link to offer sheets in the NHL:Because there are sooooo many examples of teams offer sheeting players too. So glad you used Weber's from what 6 years ago.
Yes. The best way to ease cap struggles is to get rid of the best deals.We're in a thread speaking of Toronto's cap problem. You're arguing Kadri shouldn't be dealt because he's good.
You're missing the point. If he's traded, it's to get rid of the salary.
Unless you'd rather deal Matthews away?
I think you are missing the point. Kadri would be so far down the list of players traded to save on salary that it is stupid to even bring it up.We're in a thread speaking of Toronto's cap problem. You're arguing Kadri shouldn't be dealt because he's good.
You're missing the point. If he's traded, it's to get rid of the salary.
Unless you'd rather deal Matthews away?
Here's a link to offer sheets in the NHL:
History of offer sheets in the NHL - Bing
Find a retaliatory offer sheet.
We're in a thread speaking of Toronto's cap problem. You're arguing Kadri shouldn't be dealt because he's good.
You're missing the point. If he's traded, it's to get rid of the salary.
Unless you'd rather deal Matthews away?
I did add Benn at an equivalent of $10.3M.The comparisons are Kane, Kessel and Ovechkin? Nice company for Marner there. 3 cup winners. I'd rather use more recent comparables but you do you I guess.
Is the document incomplete or erroneous ???I don't know what's worse, using a document that shows a total of 36 offer sheets since 1986 as proof it will happen or you searching this using Bing.
Respectfully, you are missing the point.I know the thread I am in, and I am well aware of the Leafs cap situation moving forward, so I hope they don't give $8 million to a 60-point player.
If want to shed salary, you don't trade a guys coming off back-t0-back 32 goal seasons, who plays a strong defensive game and is one of the best deals in the league to "get rid" of $4.5 million. You're either getting draft picks or a player that makes a hell of a lot more in return, so how does that help Toronto?
If the Leafs are looking to shed salary, it won't be Kadri they are looking at moving.
So, no, I'm not missing the point.
Just give me a minute. I'm trying to pull up the stats that show how many RFA's sign with the team that drafted them but there must be more than 36 since 1986 as it's taking me a while to compile the list.....Is the document incomplete or erroneous ???
Non-core pieces seems like the pretty obvious answer here. It is the equivalent of saying the Leafs will have to trade Rielly to save on salary. Rielly and Kadri are two of the Leafs most valuable assets right now.Respectfully, you are missing the point.
What salary would they shed ?
Edmonton screwed themselves ,other teams are learning ,I bet most GM'S wont pay nylander more than larkin ,he is dreaming ,likely wants out ,good player on a bad team .5 years is not a good term, as he would be an UFA at the end of his contract.
Offer him 4 years at the same AAV.
kadri IMO is more valuable than marner ,I think he.s no 3 on some list of leafs forwardsNon-core pieces seems like the pretty obvious answer here. It is the equivalent of saying the Leafs will have to trade Rielly to save on salary. Rielly and Kadri are two of the Leafs most valuable assets right now.
Respectfully, you are missing the point.
What salary would they shed ?
bing it or it didnt happenJust give me a minute. I'm trying to pull up the stats that show how many RFA's sign with the team that drafted them but there must be more than 36 since 1986 as it's taking me a while to compile the list.....
Oh hey, turns out it's the overwhelming majority. Well there you go. Learn something new everyday.
Oh, I see.Just give me a minute. I'm trying to pull up the stats that show how many RFA's sign with the team that drafted them but there must be more than 36 since 1986 as it's taking me a while to compile the list.....
Oh hey, turns out it's the overwhelming majority. Well there you go. Learn something new everyday.
I don't really buy that. Marner would be higher on my list based on skill and potential alone. Either way moving Kadri to help cover other contracts is most likely counter productive. You'd be better off moving Hyman and Brown before moving Kadri as the difference is basically $400,000.kadri IMO is more valuable than marner ,I think he.s no 3 on some list of leafs forwards